filed w'p Nr ''tg45 0f 2003,seekingpatta s for'l 64ar.res in Kandrakunta Regadi lll rim orders were granted on 0g.122004, ailowing agricultu-:r I I,erations. The writ petition, along wr th !,{p. No. 13504 of 2003,WI'. N r 10860 of 2004,and W.A. No. 1236 of 2008, was disposed of on (t5.011. lrt0g, direct.ng the authorities to granting rrl rs under rhe Schedule, ,ilr:.:Hr:: ;.ffi:; Forest Dra,t,,ll :rs fRecognition of Forest Rights] Ac1, ,,.006. Learned counsel fu'1 h I I contends that, in pursuance of the co u rt,.; directions, the District Colle, ron Mahabubnagal conducted an enqurry and submitted a report or 11 '3'2011 confirming that2gout orgB applicants were in possessi.r'r 'f 'rqriculturar rands in padra and Janganr l,leddy vi,ages, Amrabad IVI:'n r al' It is also contended that the petirion.rs are erigible for paftas :n,,:r the Forest Rights Act,2006,as conlirmed by the respondenti i; their counters, the Gram panchayaf i.esolution dated 22.09.2009, irr:l the panchanama dated 22.08.2008. Learned counsel would the ref<r r r r:ontend that the writ petition ma-v be a,o,,ved directing the responden : to grant pattas to the petitioners u,d,tr the Forest Righrs Acr, 200 ,
