Dismissed

M/s. Shri Ram Chlorochem Private Limited v. The Deputy/Assistant Commissioner (St)

Telangana HC3 Apr 2025WP/7438/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Writ petition challenging a GST order and related extension notifications was permitted by counsel to be withdrawn with liberty to file afresh if occasion arises. The High Court dismissed the petition as withdrawn without costs and closed pending interlocutory applications. Decides no question of law.

What did the court decide?

Petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file afresh; interlocutory applications closed.

M/s. Shri Ram Chlorochem Private Limited Vs The… — GST and Indirect Tax | Telangana HC (2025)

¶1

[^3446]

¶2

t i l

¶3

HrGHcouRr',Jl'5,?l6T,tn'fl 5l:iIsfii$ATHYDERABAD

¶4

JXfr^J l"BifJ^ff"??'H '{HE

¶5

PRESENT "'#t

¶6

THE^{HONOURABLE THE ACTINGCHTEF JUSTICE SUJOY PAUL} rHE HoNouRA"t'^{t#i"rlcEREN,KAYARA}

¶7

wRlTPE^TITI ON NO: 74380F²⁰²⁴

¶8

Between:

¶9

""-"mfi4;iliiftkg-T3.,+''s5iffi ig,h1Eiii'etsih''ff +ii

500050,^Telangana

...PETITIONER

AND

I [i.?""J,:g{}il',1's:f ",{Ixii:'s:s:+:I"H'#TS33JJ'Municipar"':*: 2 tlnion of lndia,^{Ministryof Finance' Represented by its Secretary' North Block'} New Delhi-1^{10 001 '}

¶14

3 gi$l."S"trusfl?fu ,.],11,#'-'itBt1"::?8:ru"f'Government'Revenue 4 Central rep by^{its Board commissroner of lndirect Taxes and Customs'GST Policy Wing'NewDelhi}

¶15

...RESPoNDENTS

¶16

Petition^{under Article226 of lhe Constitutionof lndia praying that in the} circumstances^{stated in the affidavit filedtherewith ' the High Courtmay be} pleased to issue

¶17

(i) awrit,order,ordirectionmoreparticularlyoneinthenatureofaWritof Mandamus^{declaring impugned order vide ReferenceNo'} 2I)361223071452N^{datecl 30 12'2023 by the Respondent No' 1 under}

¶18

tf,.^{proui"ion. of CGSTAcl' 2017 as beingvoid' arbitrary' illegal'} without^{jurisdiction, violativeof the principlesof natural iustice apart}

¶19

lY':._7

¶20

from beirg violative of Articres 14, 1g(1)(g)and 26s cf the constitution of lnrlia, and to consequen,y set aside the .rru ,nO oass such further or otlrer order(s) as this I court mav deem fit and proper in ( ii) the ci-currstances of the "]:::'o'" a writ order, or direction Ma nd, m,' d ecraringIT:"ffi ,ilil" filr :;ll;I;l: ::LT 31 .03.202i\ issued by Rr ,:,[; ;':flil,ffi:,^{x ;,H":,1.::r,"Ji:::":",;} extended the time limit for passing the orders. are without author ffi ,iL::.^,; TriH ;Hiirii::::,",* ;l?

¶21

IANo:10F 2024

¶22

petition un ier lier 15'l cPC praying that in the circumr;tances stated in the affidavit riteo i. su stay the operat c ",, ;::: lli:" ;:,::::"'"_:"HHi [.lf ::1"; 30.12.2023 passerl by the Respondent No..l .

¶23

Counsel for the petitioner: SRI M.NAGA DEEPAK

¶24

c o u ns e r f o r th e R e s po n d e n t N o. 1 ,,, * LrHjFBo 3 rX+, iH,

¶25

Counsel for the Res;pondent No.4: SRI DOMINIC FERNANDES, Sr. SC FOR CBIC

¶26

The Court made the follrryy;1g. ORDER

-1 I I II \ I

t ,

i 1 1 l ,]

t I

1 I I I

I I

THE HON'BLE^{THE ACTINGCHIEF'JUSTICESU'IOY ?AIJL T} AND THE HON,BLE^{SMT. JUSTICE RENUKA YARA --} WRIT PET^{ITTON No.7438 of 2o24 ..}

¶34

ORDER^{(Perthe Hon'bte the Acting ChiefJusticeSujoYPauU:}

¶35

Sri M.^{Naga Deepak' learned counsel for the} petitioner;^{Sri Swaroop Oorilla, learned Special Government} Pleader^{for State Tax, for respond'entNos'1 and 3; Sri B'} Mukherjee,^{learned counsel representing Sri Gadi Praveen} Kumar,^{learned Deputy Solicitor General of India' for} respondent^{No'2 and Sri Dominic Ferrnandes' learned} Senior Standing^{Counsel for CBIC'for respondentNo'4'}

¶36

2.Learnedcounselforthepetitionerseekspermission of this^{courtto withdraw the writ petitionwith libelty to the} petitioner^{to file afresh, if occasion arises'}

¶37

The other^{side has no objection'}

¶38

Accordingly,^{this Writ Petition isdismissed as} withdrawn^{with the liberty prayed for' No costs'}

¶39

¶40

Interl,rcutory applications, if any pending, shall also

stand clos:d

To,

//TRUE COPY//

SD/.L.T-AKSHMI BABU DEPTTITY REGISTRAR l

¶45

'r SE(lTlON OFFICER

¶46

One CC kr SRt M.NAGA DEEPAK, Advocate tOpUCl

¶47

One CC kr SRt DOM|N|C FERNANDES, Sr. SC FOR CB|C [OPUC]

¶48

3 Q1q c-c t, SFrr GAD| PRAVFfN KUMAR, DEpury solrcrroR GENERTAL oF tNDtA Hish Court for the Siate oi ferrhg;;-ai nvo"=nrolop-UEi- ''^-

¶49

Two CCs to St,L Gp FOR STATE TAX, High Court for the St,te of Telangana at Hyderatrad [OUT]

¶50

Two CD Crpie,; BSR LS (+

-l

HIGH COUFIT

DATED:03 tO4\Z.O2S

ORDER

WP.No.7438 rrf ZO24

ftlE SItf
7
(,
,(. iztiiry5
t 4
.sPerCrrE 0
4

¶57

DISMISSING^TIHE WRIT PETITION

¶58

AS WITHDRAWN,

¶59

WITHOUT COSTS
tr

¶60

M/s. Shri Ram Chlorochem Private Limited v. The Deputy/Assistant Commissioner (St)

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M/s. Shri Ram Chlorochem Private Limited v. The Deputy/Assistant Commissioner (St)

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M/s.New Maheswari Medical Agencies Vs The Assistant Commissioner (St)

Cemetrix (It) Services Private Limited Vs The Commissioner of Commercial Taxes

M/s. Venkateswara Granites Vs The Assistant Commissioner of Central Tax and GST

Pragathi Fruits Commission Agents Association Vs Mr. M. Raghunandan Rao, IAS

Sai Chaitanya Steel Agencies Vs The Assistant Commissioner (State Tax)

M/s. Sri Durga Bhavani Enterprises Vs Assistant Commissioner (State Tax)