Petitioner sought withdrawal of a writ petition concerning issuance of a new pattadar pass book for agricultural land; court permitted withdrawal with liberty to seek other remedies, dismissing the petition without costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[32e6 ]
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY, THE EIGHTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENry F|VE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRIJUSTICE C.V. BHASKAR REDDY
WRIT PETITION NO: 720 OF 2025
Between:
Smt. Sareena Bai @ Sona Bai, Wo K. Satyanand, Aged about 65 years, Occ Housewife, R/o H.No.12-1 1-85, Goshala Road, Raichur, Karnataka State.
.....PETITIONER
AND
.....RESPONDENTS
Petition Under Article 226 ot the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, Order or Direction, more so, a Writ in the nature of Mandamus, by declaring the inaction of the respondent Nos.2 to 4 in not considering the Application daled 10-12-2O24, for issuance of new pattdar pass book, in respect of the land an extent of Ac.O-58 Cents in Sy.No.256/AA situated at Makthal Shivar, Makthal Mandal, Narayanpet District, as arbitrary, illegal, highhanded and opposed to the principles of natural justice and consequentially, to direct the respondents to issue a new Pattadar Pass book, as per the above said applicatlon pending before the 4th respondent herein.
l.A.NO:'f OF 2025
Petition Under section 151CPC prayingthat in the circumstancesstated in the affidavit filed in support of thepetition,the Highcourt may be pleasedto direct the 4th respondent toissue a newpattadar pass book as per application dated 10-'12-2024, in respect ofthe land an extent of Ac.0-58 Centsin sy.No.256/A4 situated at Makthalshivar,Makthal Mandal, NarayanpetDistrict, during thependency of the abovewrit petition'
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI METTU SHANKAR
Counsel forthe Respondents: AGP FOR REVENUE
The Court made the followingORDER
HOII'BLE SRI JUSTICEC.V.BHASKAR REDDY
WRIT PETITI ON No.72O of2O2S
ORDER:
Learned counsel for thepetitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdrawthe writ petition with a liberty to avail the remedies asavailableunderlaw.
As a sequel thereto,MiscellaneousPetitions, if any,
pending, shall stand closed.
SD/. L.LAKSHMI BABU ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
//TRUE COPYII
SECTION OFFICER
To
HIGH COURT
DATED:0810112025
ORDER
WP.No.720 of 2025
{BF.--
1HE s14
d^
c I
o 2 4 FEB ?O?5
*
DISMISSING THE W.P
AS WITHDRAWN WITHOUT COSTS.
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the court would grant the petitioner's request to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to pursue statutory remedies.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Smt. Sareena Bai @ Sona Bai, Wo K. Satyanand
The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Revenue Department
The District Collector, Narayanpet District
The Revenue Divisional Officer, Narayanpet Revenue Division, Narayanpet District
The Tahsildar, Makthal Mandal, Narayanpet District
The Chief Commissioner of Land Administration, State of Telangana
C.V. Bhaskar Reddy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
