Disposed¶33

Yagnashree Rajendher Rao Kadali v. The State of Telangana

Telangana HC4 Mar 2025WP/6638/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

PG-Medical admission AY 2024-25; Management Quota Category 2 (NRI); NRI quota registration; final stray vacancy/leftover seats counselling; KNRUHS; representation to Registrar; reasoned order before next counselling; Article 226 mandamus; Section 151 CPC application; writ petition disposed without costs; no opinion on merits; Telangana High Court; Sujoy Paul ACJ; Renuka Yara J; Abdul Kabeer; R. Nagarjuna Reddy GP; T. Sharath SC KNRUHS.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner permitted to file a representation along with relevant documents before respondent No.2 (KNRUHS); respondent No.2 to consider and decide the representation in accordance with law by passing a reasoned order before the next counselling; no opinion expressed on merits; no costs; pending interlocutory applications stand closed. ¶33

Yagnashree Rajendher Rao Kadali Vs The State of… — Writ and Judicial Review | Telangana HC (2025)

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

¶33

Issue for consideration

Whether the petitioner, who could not register for the NRI Quota earlier for want of NRI documents, should be considered for registration for admission into the PG-Medical course for academic year 2024-25 under Management Quota Category 2 (NRI) in the final stray vacancy/leftover seats counselling and subsequent phases of counselling.

¶14

Court's answer

The writ petition was disposed of by permitting the petitioner to file a representation along with relevant documents before respondent No.2.

¶33

Ratio / Principle

Respondent No.2 was directed to consider and decide the petitioner's representation in accordance with law by passing a reasoned order before the next counselling.

¶34

Key takeaways

The Court made clear that it had not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case, and directed that there be no costs.obiter¶35
Pending interlocutory applications, if any, were directed to stand closed.ratio¶36

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

Telangana High Court (Special Original Jurisdiction), W.P. No. 6638 of 2025 (Yaonashree Raiendher Rao Kadali v. State of Telangana and Kaloji Narayana Rao University of Health Sciences), decided 04.03.2025 by Sujoy Paul, ACJ, and Renuka Yara, J.: Petitioner, who had registered for Management Quota but could not register for the NRI Quota for want of NRI documents, sought a mandamus directing consideration of his registration for PG-Medical admission for AY 2024-25 under Management Quota Category 2 (NRI) in the final stray vacancy/leftover seats counselling and subsequent phases. Without expressing any opinion on the merits, the Court disposed of the writ petition permitting the petitioner to file a representation with relevant documents before respondent No.2, which was to consider and decide it in accordance with law by passing a reasoned order before the next counselling. No costs. Pending interlocutory applications closed.

¶1

[³⁴⁴⁶¹

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE^{OF TELANGANAAT HYDERABAD} . (Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶3

TUESDAY, THE FOURTH^{DAYOF MARCH} TWO THOUSAND AND^TWENryFIVE

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HONOURABLE^{THEACTING CHIEF JUSTICE SUJOY PAUL} AND THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE^RENUKAYARA

¶6

WRIT PETITION NO: 6638 OF²⁰²⁵

¶7

Between:

¶8

Yaonashree Raiendher Rao^{Kadali, S/o, Ramoji Rao Kadali, Age. 35 y-e-ars, Occ'} stut"ni^{-nio,'a-ilz,aakutthivaripalem, Mbdekurru, Kothapeta,Mandalam,} Modekurru, East Godavari,^AP-533229.

¶9

...PETITIONER

¶10

AND

¶11

The State of Telangana,^{Represented by its Principal Secretary,Mediga]iand} Health Family Welfare Depdrtment,^{SecretariatBuildings' Hyderabad-5ou} 055.

¶12

Kaloji Nararayana Rao^{University of Health Sciences' Represented by its} Registrar, Warangal.

¶13

...RESPONDENTS

¶14

Petition under Article²²⁶ ol^{lhe constitution of lndia prayingthat in the} circumstances stated in the^{affidavitfiled therewith,the High court maybe} pleased to issue an appropriate writ,^{order or direction more particularlyonein} the nature of writ of^{mandamus declaring the action of the respondents} particularly the 2nd respondent in^{not considering the petitioner for registrationfor} admission into PG-Medical^{course for the academic yeal 2024-25 undet} Management Quota category^{2 (NRl) for final stray vacancy/leftoverseats} counselling and subsequent^{phase ofcounselingasillegal, arbitrary,} unconstitutional and^{consequentlydirect the respondents to consider the} petitioner request for registration for^{admissioninto PG-Medicalmanseunder} Management Quota^{Category 2 (NRl) in final stray vacancy/leftover seats} counselling and subsequent^{phases of counsellingfor the academicyear 2O24-} 25.

¶15

lA NO: 1 OF 2025

¶16

Petition under^{lsection 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in} the affidavit filed in support^{of the petition, the High Court maybe pleased to} direct the 2nd respondent^{to consider the petitioner request for registrationfor} admission into PG-Medical^{course under ManagementQuota Category 2 (NRl)} final stray vacancy/left over^{seats counsellingandsubsequentphases of} counselliri! for the academic^{year 2o24-25 pendingdisposalof the writ petition.}

¶17

Counsel for the Petitioner^{: SRIABDUL KABEER}

¶18

Counsel for the Respondent^{No.1 : SRIR.NAGARJUNAREDDY,} GP FOR MEDICAL HEALTH^FW

¶19

Counsel forthe Respondent^No.2: SRI T.SHARATH, SC FOR KNRUHS

¶20

The Court made the following:^ORDER

¶21

[-,

¶22

THE HON,BLE^{THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE SUJOY PAUL}

¶23

AND

¶24

THE HON'BLE^{SMT JUSTICE RENUKA YARA}

¶25

WRIT PETITION^{N.6638 of 2O25}

¶26

ORDER:^{(Per the Hon'ble the Acting' Chief JusticeSujog Paul)}

¶27

Sri Abd.ul Kabeer,^{learned counsel appearingfor the} petitioner, Sri^{R.Nagarjuna Reddy,learned GovernmentPleaderfor} Medical and^{Health, appearing forrespondentNo' 1and} Sri T. Sharath,^{learned Standing Counsel for Kaloji NarayanaRao} University^{of Health Sciences,appearing for respondentNo'2'}

¶28

Heard on admisSion.

¶29

Learned counsel^{for thepetitionersubmitsthat the} petitioner^{got registered himselffor Management Quota but could} not register^{for NRI} Quota^{because he was not in possession of NRI} He submits^{that the} Petitioner documents^{at that} Point^{of time'} will prefer a^{representationbeforerespondentNo'2 tomorrow r'e'} 05.03.2025^{and the said authority may be directedto consider it} and take^{a decisionbeforethe next counselling'}

¶30

, I

¶31

Learned, Standing^{counsel for respondent No'2 has no} objection to this^{innocuous prayer'}

¶32

¶33

Accordingl.7, this Writ Petition is disposed of by permitting the petitioner tc file such representation along with relevalt documents before respondent. No.2. In turn, respondent No.2 shali consi<ler and decide such representation,

¶34

in accordance with law, by passing a reasoned ,:rder before the next counselilg It is made clear that this Court has not

¶35

expressed any op,inion on the merits of the case. No costs.

¶36

Interlocul.ory applications, if arly pending, shal1 also stand

¶37

closed.

¶38

1, To,

¶39

SD/-T.CHANDRA SHEKAR REDDY GISTRAR //TRUE COPYII OFFICER