Writ petition challenging appointment of respondent as VRO and seeking enquiry into representation; petitioner sought leave to withdraw and the writ petition was dismissed as withdrawn without costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
132521
HIGH COURT FOR THE ST TE OF TELANGANA AT HYDER BAD (Special Original urisdiction)
MONDAY,THE NINT DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AN TWENry FIVE
PRESE T
THE HONOURABLE MRS JUS ICE SUREPALLI NANDA
WRIT PETITION NO 6112 0F 2020
Between:
Smt. Althuri Lachamma, Wo. Late El uri Bhumaiah, Aged about 70 years, Occ. Agriculture, R/o. Sirsanagandla illage of Kondapaka Mandal, Siddipet District.
...PETITIONER
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Co stitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, Order, or Directio ,more particularlyone in natureof Writ of MANDAMUS declaring the inactio of the Respondent No. 2 to 5 in considering the Representation dated 1B 01-2020 filed by the Petitioner to conduct an enquiry on the matter of ille ally given the Post of VRA to the Respondent No.6 as illegal, arbitrary, unc nstitutional and violation of Articles 14,15 and 2'1 of the constitution of lndia
IA NO: 1 OF 2020
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondent No 2 to 5 to consider the Representation dated 18-0 1- 2O2O filed by the Petitioner to conduct an enquiry on the matter of illegally given the Post of VRA to the Respondent No.6 in pending disposal of the main Writ Petition
lA NO:'t OF 2022
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to permit the petitioner herein as Legal Heir of Deceased writ petitioner by name Althuri Lachamma @ Lachavva in the W.P.No. 6112 of 2020 as well as lAs
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRl. RAPOLU BHASKAR
Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 1,2,4&5: GP FOR REVENUE
Counsel for the Respondent No.3: GP FOR HOME
Counsel for the Respondent No.6:-
The Court made the following: ORDER
HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE S REPALLI NANDA
w TP IT N t2 20
ORDER:
Sri Rapolu Bhaskar, learn counsel appeaflng on behalf of the petitioner seeks eave of this Court for withdrawal of the present writ peti on.
costs.
,{s a sequel, the miscellan ous petitions, if an'/.
pending in the Writ petition shall als stand closed.
I
SD/.N. SRIHARI DEPUry REGISTRAR //TRUE CO To, SECTION OFFICER z. I 9n" 99te sE1 RApoLUBHASKAR vocate PUCI .I ,woCCsto GP FoR REVENUE. ,Iiki h ourt forth Hyderabad IOUTT e State of Telangana at 3 I*g CCs to'cp FoR HorME, High co Hyderabad IOUTI urt or the State of Telangana, at 4. Two CD Coiies' BM BS
l t
HIGH COURT
DATED:0910612025
ORDER
1 t\E STr,i €
{
v
J 13N8ffi o
t
\1
oEspar''',
WP.No.6112of 2020
DISMISSINGTHE WRIT PETITION AS WITHDRAWN WTTHOUT COSTS
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Smt. Althuri Lachamma @ Lachavva
The State of Telangana
The District Collector, Siddipet (Old Medak) District
The Commissioner of Police, Siddipet (Old Medak) District
The RDO, Gajwel Division Siddipet
The Tahsildhar, Jagadevpur Mandal, Siddipet District
Surepalli Nanda
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
