A writ petition challenging the rejection of approval for tax exemption under section 10(23C)(vi) of the Income Tax Act was dismissed as infructuous upon the petitioner's counsel submitting that the matter had become infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[348s ]
IN TI{E HIGH COURTFOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY, THE NINTHDAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND ANDTWENryFIVE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRTJUSTICEP.SAM KOSHY AND
THE HONOURABLE SRIJUSTICE SUDDALA CHALAPATHI RAO
WRIT PETITION NO: 6096 0F2010
Between:
Matrusri EducationSociety, HyderabadD.No. 16-1486,Saidabad, Hy-derabad (A Societu incorporated undei'theAndhraPRadeshTelanganaArea) PublicSocieties Registiation Act,1 350,Fasli(Act-l of 1350F) rep.by its Secretary'
.....PETITIONER
AND
.....RESPONDENTS
Petition Under Article 226 ofthe constitutionof lndiapraying that in the circumstancesstated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High court may be pleased to issue writ of certiorari or anyotherwrit, orderor direction quashingthe order of the respondentNo.1 bearing proceedingsF.No.CC/Tech.U22B(41O)lo9-1O dated 23.2.2O10decliningto approvethe petitionersociety for the purposeof section 10(23C)(vi) of thel.T.Act 1961 as being arbitrary, unreasonableand illegal, and to declare thatthe petitioner is entitledto the approval under section 10(23C) (vi) of thel T,Act 1 96'1.
I.A.NO:1 OF 2010(WPMP. NO: 7848 OF 2010 )
Petition Under section151 CPC praying that in the circumstances statedin the affidavit filedin supportof the petition, the High court maybe pleased to direct the respondents to extendthe benefit of exemption under section10(23C) (vi) of the l.T.Act to thepetitioner in the income tax assessment for the assessment year
t
2009-2010 and onwards and not to take any coercive measur rs for recovery of any income tax demands pending disposal of the above writ peli on.
Counsel for the Petitioner : Ms. SAGARIKA KONERU, FOR SRI Y.RATNAKAR
Counsel for the Respondents : SC FOR INCOME TAX
The Court made the following ORDER
11 r)
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICEP.SAMKOSHY AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUDDALA CHALAPATHIRAO
W.P.No.6096 OF 2010
QBDEB,@er Hon'bleSri.Iustice P.SamKoshy)
Today, when the matter istaken up for hearing, Ms.Sagarika
Koneru, learned counselrepresenting Mr-Y.Ratnakar,leamed counsel for the petitionersubmits that the matter hassince become infructuous.
2 Recording the above madesubmission, this writ petition
stands dismissed as infructuous.There shallbe no order as to costs.
Consequently, miscellaneouspetitions pendrrg, if any,shall
stand closed
\
//TRUE COPY//
D/. L. VIJAYA LAXM STANT REGI
ECTION OFFICER
To
SA LS
q.F
n
HIGH COURT
DATED:09109l,2025
ORDER
::- -
,., - -f--
/ t\r. ',..,. :..
84 [.;t i'u /:
i,,.,i\i
,.'& .d'
*.. i
'\ j1; \ rt';t)
WP.No.6096 of 2010
DISMISSING THE W.P
AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS.
ttr
u
l1^
Matrusri Education Society
Chief Commissioner of Income Tax
Director of Income Tax (Exemptions)
P. Sam Koshy
Suddala Chalapathi Rao
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
