Disposed

Yellaboina Lingaswamy v. The State of Telangana

Telangana HC7 Jul 2025WP/6026/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioners sought mandamus over respondent No.2's failure to register their appeal and stay application regarding land possession. The appeal has since been numbered C.M.A.No.18 of 2025. The court disposed of the writ petition directing disposal of that appeal within three months after notice and hearing, continuing the earlier interim order till then.

What did the court decide?

Respondent No.2 directed to decide C.M.A.No.18 of 2025 within three months after hearing all parties; earlier interim order extended till disposal.

Yellaboina Lingaswamy Vs The State of Telangana — Property and Title | Telangana HC (2025)

¶1

.[3301]

¶2

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶3

MONDAY, THE SEVENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE PULLA KARTHIK

¶6

WRIT PETITION NO: 6026 OF 2025

¶7

Between:

¶8

Yellaboina Lingaswamy, S/o Bixamaiah, Age. 42 years, Occ- Agriculture, Fl/o. H.No. 5-17, Gollagudem, Sarvaram Village, Sujatha Nagar Mandal, Bhadradri Kothagudem District

¶9

Yellaboina Lingaiah, S/o Bixamaiah, Age. 59 years, Occ. Agriculture, Fl/o, H.No. 5-17, Gollagudem, Sarvaram Village, Sujatha Nagar [\4andal, Bhadradri Kothagudem District

¶10

Yellaboina Mallaiah, S/o Bixamaiah, Age. 67 years, Occ. Agriculture, Rl/o. H.No. 5-19, Gollagudem, Sarvaram Village, Sujatha Nagar [Mandal, Bhadradri Kothagudem District

¶11

.....PETITIONERS

¶12

AND

¶13

The State of Telangana, Represented by its Principal Secretary, Tribal Welfare Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad.

¶14

The Addl. Agent to Government (PO, ITDA), Bhadrachalann-5O7111, Bhadradri Kothagudem District.

¶15

The Special Deputy Collector (fW), Bhadrachalam-so7111 , Bhadradri Kothagudem District.

¶16

The Tahsildar, Manuguru Mandal, Bhadradri Kothagudem District.

¶17

Smt. Mukthi Papamma, W/o Late Pagadaiah, Age. Unknown, Occ. Unknown, Fl/o. Kistaram Village, Tekulapalli Mandal, Bhadradri Kothagudem District.

¶18

Vemulapalli Bhaskar Rao, S/o. Anjaiah, Age. Uknown, Occ. Unknown, Rl/o. Vidyaar Colony, Chunchupalli (V and M),Bhadradri Kothagudem District.

¶19

.....RESPONDENTS

¶20

Petition Under Article 226 oI the Constitution of lndia^praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue writ or direction preferably writ of mandamus, declaring the in

¶21

action of the 2nd respondent in not registering the appea and the lnterlocutory application therein on 2O11212024 and not disposing of the lnterlocutory application on merits, regarding the grant of stay of our dispossession from the subject property admeasuring an extent of Ac.1-17 Gts in Sy.No. 107lee, situated at Singabhupalem village, Sujathnagar Mandal, Bhadradri l(othagudem District ih order to maintain status quo with regard to our possessicn pending disposal of the statutory appeal, as illegal, arbitrary and violative o' principles of natural justice, violative of article 300 of the constitution of lndia and consequentially direct respondent no.4 and their subordinate staff nr)t to dispossess the petitioners from the possession and enjoyment of the sclredule property stated supra, pending disposal of the appeal on the file of the 2nd respondent.

¶22

l.A.NO:1 OF 2025

¶23

Petition Under Section 151 CPC praying that in the c rcumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Cou rt may be pleased to direct the respondent no. 4 and their subordinate staff rrot to dispossess the petitioners from the possession and enjoyment of :he subject property admeasuring an extent of Ac. 1-17 Gts in Sy.No. 1O7lee, situated at Singabhupalem village, Sujathnagar Mandal, Bhadradri Kothagudem District, pending disposal of the appeal on the file of the 2nd respon,jent.

¶24

Counsel for the Petitioners : SRI M.MURALI KRISHNA, LEARNED COUNSEL, REPRESENTING M/s MANDAPATI LEGAL SERVICES AND ASSOCIATES

¶25

Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 to 3 : GP FOR SOCIAL WELFARE

¶26

Counsel for the Respondent No.4 : GP FOR REVENUE

¶27

Counsel for the Respondent Nos.s & 6 : -

¶28

The Court made the following ORDER

¶29

t {

¶30

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE PULLA KARTHIK

¶31

WRIT PETITION No.6 026 of 2025

¶32

ORDER:

¶33

Aggrieved by the action of respon.dent No.2 in not registering the appeal preferred by the petitioners and the interlocutory application therein, and also in noL disposing of the sard application on me rits, the present writ petition has bccn file d.

¶34

Heard Sri M. Murali Krishna, learned counsel, representing M/s. Mandapati Legal Services ard Associates, lcarnerl counsel for tl'rc petitioners and learned Govcrnment for Sor:ial Welfare appearing on behalf of respondent Nos.1 Lo 4.

¶35

Today, when the matter is takcn up for hearing, on instrucLions, learnecl Governnrcn[ [)]cadcr lor Social Welfarc, submits that the appeal preferred by the pctilioners came to be numbered as C.l\4.A.No.18 of 2025, on the hle of respondent No.2, and thcrefore, seeks considerable period of time to dispose of the appcal in accordance rn ith law.

¶36

Having regard to the above made submissions, the Writ petition is disposed of directing respondcnt No.2 to pass appropriate orders in the appea-l preferred by the pctitioner vide C.M.A.No. l U of 2025, erfter

¶37

:'?r,

¶38

¶39

PK, J 1V.P No.602ai oJ 2A25

¶40

putting all the affected parties on notice and in co rlormrt1, u,ith the principles of natural justice, ciuly providing them utn opportunitl, of hearing, strictl.rr in accordance with law, as expediti,tusly as possible, preferabll. rvithin :r period of three (O3) months iom rhe dale of receipt ol a copy o[ this order, and communicate a clpv thereof to the petitioners. Tiil such time, the interim order earlier granted by this Court on 28.O2 .2025, as is being extended periodically, sl-rall conlinuc

¶41

Misccilaneous zrpplications, if any, pendrng in Lhis rvrit peLition, shall stand closed. No costs.

¶42

SDr- A. SRINIVAS^REDDY ASSISTANT^REgISTRAR //TRUE^COPY//

¶43

^1. secrrflrtb'rrrcen

¶44

To 1. The Principal^{Secretary,Tribal Welfare Department' Secretariat' State of} Telanoana^{at HYderabad'}

¶45

1. ii;ffi?iln?d"i^{to cou"|.n'ntnt (Po' ITDA)' Bhadrachalann -507 1 1 1'} ahadradri Kothagudem^District' The Soecial^{Deputy Collecto'"('fW)' Ah'Ot'chalam-sc711 1 ' Bhadradri} Kothabudem^District.

¶46

?# ;ffi i6;;^{tvtrnrgrt,Mandal, Bhadradri Kothagu'l€mDistrict'} q rwo ccs to Gp FOR^{SocfiL"\iErinne,High colrtto. the state of} 6 +fl383!?"'LE^{ESfi'fE"L"-',]1,Hish courtror the sitate or reransanaat}

¶47

3I1"3t?S J7.''JINDA,A.^{LEGAL .ERVT.ESAND}

¶48

7 ndsoctnf^{es, Advocate[oPUC]}

¶49

B Two CD CoPies

SA a K

I I I I i i i

HIGH COURT

DATED:0710712025

.:-
;.':::.,
\ o \1.
' ....-
:,
:.)
:.)
i;ll 'i. 0 i sEP 205
.1,

ORDER

WP.No.6026 of 2025

DISPOSING OF THE W.P

WITHOUT COSTS.

Yellaboina Lingaswamy v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Yellaboina Lingaswamy v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Smt. Anthargama Chandramma Vs Sri. Akula Venkatesh

Thrinath Sandharaju Vs Sri B. Venkatesh, IAS

Bura Srinivas Vs Sri. E.V. Narasimha Reddy, IAS

Ganiboina Srinivas Vs The State of Telangana

Sri Bhaskar Alloy Castings Vs The State of Telangana

G. Sujatha Vs The Tsrtc