Muthyam Ramesh Vs The State of Telangana — Writ and Judicial Review | Telangana HC (2025)

Muthyam Ramesh Vs The State of Telangana — Writ and Judicial Review | Telangana HC (2025)

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

Liberty to avail appropriate remedy as available under law; writ petition dismissed as withdrawn, without costs.

Issue for consideration

Whether the inaction of the 5th respondent Sub Registrar in not cancelling the registered sale deed documents, Document No. 18024/2024 dated 31.07.2024 and Document No. 15976/2024 dated 18.07.2024, said to have been executed by the petitioner in favour of respondents 2 to 4 without payment of balance sale consideration, was illegal, arbitrary and violative of Articles 14, 19, 21 and 300-4 (as printed) of the Constitution, warranting cancellation of those deeds.

Ratio / Principle

This Court accorded permission to the petitioner to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to avail appropriate remedy as available under law, and accordingly dismissed the writ petition as withdrawn (without costs); no substantive issue on the merits was adjudicated.

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad, Writ Petition No. 5914 of 2025, Honourable Sri Justice N.V. Shravan Kumar, order dated 28.02.2025. Petitioner Muthyam Ramesh (Article 226 petition) sought a writ of mandamus declaring illegal the inaction of the 5th respondent Sub Registrar (Hanumakonda) in not cancelling registered sale deeds Document No. 18024/2024 dated 31.07.2024 and Document No. 15976/2024 dated 18.07.2024, said to have been executed by the petitioner in favour of respondents 2 to 4 (M/s. AMIGOS Developers and Estates; Nayini Shiva Prasad Rao; Gattamaneni Sathish Chandra) without payment of balance sale consideration, invoking Articles 14, 19, 21 and 300-4 (as printed) of the Constitution, and sought consequential directions to the Sub Registrar to cancel the deeds and to respondents 6 to 8 (Station House Officer, KU Police Station; Vice Chairman, KUDA; Commissioner, Greater Warangal Municipal Corporation) to act against respondents 2 to 4. I.A. No. 1 of 2025 (Section 151 CPC) sought the same relief interim. When the matter was taken up, learned counsel for the petitioner sought permission to withdraw with liberty to avail appropriate remedy; the Court accorded permission and dismissed the writ petition as withdrawn, without costs; miscellaneous petitions pending were directed to stand (sentence truncated in source). No merits adjudicated; no precedents cited.

[³²⁵⁵ ]

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

FRIDAY, THE TWENW EIGHTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENry FIVE

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.V,SHRAVAN KUMAR

WRIT PETITION NO: 5914 OF 2025

Between:

Muthyam Ramesh, S/o. Narsaiah, Aged about 42 years, Occ ; Business, Rl/o. H No.5-169, SC Colony, Kamalapur Village, Mangapeta Mandal, Warangal District 506 172.

.....PETITIONER

AND

The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Stamps and Registration Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad.

Mls. AMIGOS Developers and Estates, Rep. by its Managing Partner, Ram Kishore Godumala, S/o. Venkateswarlu, Aged 43 years, Occ. Business, Rl/o. Plot No. 44, Sri Venkaramana Colony, Road No.3, Vanasthalipuram, K.V. Ranga Redddy District.

Nayini Shiva Prasad Rao, S/o. Laxman Rao, Aged 79 years, Occ. Retd. Employee, Rl/o. Plot No.49, Venkataramana Colony, Road No.3, Vanasthalipuram, K.V. Ranga Redddy District.

Gattamaneni Sathish Chandra, S/o. Sagarendrayya alias Saharendrayya, Aged 43 years, Occ. Real Estate Business, Rlo. H No. 1-1-211, Plot No. 304, Lahari Garden Apartment, Meena Vikas Nagar, Opp. Post Office, New Boinpally, Tirumalagiri, Hyderabad.

The Sub Registrar, O/o. Stamps and Registrations, Office at Shivam Road, Waddepally, Hanumakonda.

The Station House Officer, KU Police Station, Kareemnagar Road, Bheemaram, Hanumakonda District 506 009.

The Vice Chairman, Kakatiya Urban Development Authority (KUDA), Hanumakonda, Warangal District.

The Commissioner Greater, Warangal Municipal Corporation, Warangal 506 002.

.....RESPONDENTS

Petition Under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia^praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the inaction of the Sth respondent Sub Registrar in not cancelling the illegal registered sale deed documents i.e., 1802412024 dt 3110712024 and 1597612024, daled 1810712024 executed by the^{petitioner in} favour. of the respondents 2 to 4 without paying balance sale consideration illegal interfering into the property basing on the said documents is highly illegal, arbitrary and against the^principles of natural^justice and also violative of Articles 14, 19,21 and 300-4 of Constitution of lndia and consequently direct the Sth respondent sub Registrar to cancel the registered sale deeds i.e.. 1802412024 dt 3110712024 and 15976/2024, dated 1BlO7l2O24 immediately in the interest of justice.

|.A.NO:1 OF 2025

Petition Under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents particularly Sth respondent to cancel the sale deeds vide document no. 1802412024 dt 311O712024 and 1597612024, dated 1810712024 and also direct the respondents 6 to 8 to take action against the respondents 2 to 4 immediately, pending disposal of the main writ petition.

Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI ARRAM SHIVASHANKAR

Counsel forthe Respondent Nos.1 & 5 : AGP FOR REVENUE

Counsel for the Respondent Nos.2 to 4 : --

Counsel forthe Respondent No.6 : AGP FOR HOME

Counsel for the Respondent No.7 : SRI P.CHANDRA SHEKAR

Counsel for the Respondent No.8 : SRI PASHAM MOHITH

The Court made the following ORDER

l

/

HONOURABLE SRI IUSTICE N.V.SHRAVAN KUMAR

WRIT PETITION No.5914 of 2025

ORDER:

Today when the ma tter has been taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the writ petition with a liberty to avail appropriate remedy as available under law.

In view of the same, permission is accorded to withdraw the writ petition with a liberty to avail appropriate remedy as available under law.

Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this writ petition shall stand

sD/-P. cH. NAGABHUSHAMBA ,/ ISTANT REGISTRAR /

//TRUE COPYII

To

SECTION OFFICER

f . Two Hyderabad.CCs to louGp TJFOR REVENUE High Court for the State of Telangana at

Two CCs to Hyderabad tOUI9P^FORHOME High Court for the State of Telangana at

One CC to SRI ARRAM S HIVASHANKA R, Advocate [OpU cl 4. One CC to SRI P.CHAN DRA SHEKAR ,Advocate (OpUC 6. 5. Two One CCC to SRI PASHA IV MOHITH, Advo cate (OPUC) ) D Copies SA LS ?*

HIGH COURT

DATED:2810212025

ORDER

J 1$E S T,.l I { a,tA
?
0I APn 2ilz5
-i
.a+
*
SPAI <1]

WP.No.5914 ot 2025

DISMISSING THE W.P

AS WITHDRAWN WITHOUT COSTS. t^{A^} J4^x))

l