Petitioner challenged illegal transfer of Deputy Director and non-consideration of her promotion representation. Court directed authorities to consider her representation within four weeks and disposed of the petition without merits.
Directed respondent authorities to consider petitioner's representation for promotion within four weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[3304 ]
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY, IHE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OFFEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NAMAVARAPURAJESHWAR RAO
WRIT PETITION NO: 5854 OF 2025
Between:
V. Nagalakshmi, W/o J. Sudheendra, Agedabout 59 years, Deputy Director' Adult Education, Ranga Reddy District IDOC Building,Collectorate Compound,Kongara Kalan, Ranga Reddy District - 501 510.
.....PETITIONER
AND
.....RESPONDENTS
Petition Under Article 226 of the Constitutionof lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavitfiledtherewith,the High Court maybe pleased to issue a Writ, Order or Direction, moreparticularly onein the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the actionof the official Respondents in transferring and posting the unofficial Respondent asDirector of Adult Educationvide Proceedings in Rc.No.25lSe r.ll2o23, dated03-04-2023 issued by the Director of School Education, Telangana andnot consideringthe case of the petitioner for promotion to the post of Director of Adult Educationis wholly illegal,arbitrary, withoutjurisdiction and violative of Articles14,'1 6 and 21 of the constitutionof lndia and consequently declare thatthe unofficial Respondent is not entitledto.be continued as Director ofAdult Educationand that the petitioneris entitledfor
ta
promotion to the post of Director of Adult Education with all consequential benefits.
l.A.NO:1 OF 202s
Petition Under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court nray be pleased to direct the 1st Respondent to consider the case of the petitioner for promotion to the post of Director of Adult Education by disposing of her representation, dated 31-12-2024.
Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI KIRTHI TEJA KONDAVEETI
Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 to 3 : GP FOR SERVICES - I
Counsel for the Respondent No.4 : -
The Court made the following ORDER
./7
THE HON'BLESRI JUSTICE NAMAVARAPU RAJESHWARRAO
WRIT PETITIONNo.5854OF 2025
ORDER
Heard learnedcounsel for petitioner,learned Government PleaderforServices-I,appea-ring for respondentNos. 1 to 3.
proper channel to the Principal Secretar5r to Government, School Education Departrnent, Government of Telangana dated 31.12.2024 to consider her case for promotion to the post of Director of Adult Education.
./.
'l ,
to consider the representation submitted by the petitioner dated 31.12.2024 and pass appropriate orders in accordance with 1aw, as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of four (04) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.
7 With the above direction, the Writ petition is disposed of. No order as to costs.
Pending rniscellaneous applications, if any, shall
stand closed.
SD/-A.V.S.PRASAD ASSISTANTREGISTRAR
//TRUE COPY//
CTION OFFICER
To
SA
GJP
HIGH COURT
DATED:27rc212025
ORDER
WP.No.5854 of 2025
r-lFrr '
i\L lrii €'
(
(
(>2
f 24 r,h; zfls
J
t
ac.-i^oa r
DISPOSING OF THE W.P
WITHOUT COSTS.
q
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the High Court should direct respondent authorities to consider the petitioner's representation for promotion to the post of Director of Adult Education.
3 provisions across 3 enactments
V. Nagalakshmi
State of Telangana
Director of School Education, Telangana
Director of Adult Education, Telangana
Dr. G. Usha Rani
NAMAVARAPU RAJESHWAR RAO
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
