Petitioner sought a mandamus directing HPCL not to supply petroleum products to respondents 5 and 6 for breach of an agreement. Counsel stated the cause of action no longer survived; the writ petition was dismissed as infructuous without costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
132s21
HrGH couRrt?T I+EDSIiIioF TELANGANA
lsPeciiioriginalJurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY,THE TWELFTHDAY OF FEBRUARY "-""rwo iiousAND AND TWENTY FlvE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLEMRSJUSTICE SUREPALLI NANDA
WRITPETlTIO N NO:4634 0F 2017
"""ilor Raiender, S/oNarsimlu'A991i9,I"9',i.1,?i",?HXl";id,IyiH'No'44- 82, BesideVenkates
...PETITIONER
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petitionunder A(icle 226 of the Constitution.,of lndiapraying that in the circumstancesstatedin ,lJ""orir"ii-ntlo tnerewitn. the Hish court maybe oleased toissue ,n ,oorooli]t"-iiioio"lor.direction'more particularly one in the nature ofwrit of MandarJ'l#"1,"sin" ,"tion of the 3rd Respondent in not honouringtheir letter onrei"'i''')ori "saruit'arv'illeoal violative directof Article the 3rd14' 21 and300 A of tn" "i'itln'-uoL"'or-tnoia p'oJ'"tt 'nd toRespondents "on"ttq'"ntly5 and 6 Respondentnot to supply tilililile;
l.A. NO: 1()F 2 017(WP MP. NO: 5605 0F 20 171
Petition urrrJer Section.lsl cpc praying that in the t:ircurrstances stated in jl'ealfigalt fite(l in support or tne.petiti#,1'rr"'Hjgi'iorn nray t,e pteased to direct the 3rd Rr-'srrc r crent to stop *i" srpiry-oi'"th"" putro eurr products to the Responden,i ,:r, rvhich is run by n"rponULni. s i o, Ouring pendency of writ petition' otherw se'the petitioneiwin u. prii" ,ir"-pJ"ot" to.. and injury.
Counsel for the Pr-'titioner: SRl. G MADHUSUDHAN REDDy
Counsel for the *espondent Nos.1 to 4: SRt THOOM SRlNlvAli; SC FOR H'CL
Counsel for ttre Fbspondent No.S TO 7: SRI C HARI PREETH
The Court marje the following: ORDER
) )
HON'BLEMRS JUSTICESUREPALLI NANDA
w P I N o 4 1
ORD E R:
Heard SriG.Madhusudan Reddy' learned counsel appearingon behalf of the petitioner'Sri Thoom Srinivas' learned StandingCounse! forH'ndustanPetroleum CorporationLimited, appearing onbehalf ofthe respondentNos.1to4and Sri C.HariPreeth,learned counsel appearingon behalf of the respondent Nos'S to 7'
1
2 e ti n ra ro h e rt r
as under:
"...to issue an appropriatewrit' order or direction' moreparticularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaringthe action of the 3'd Respondentin not honouringtheir letter dated 24'12'2014 as arbitrary' illegal, violativeof ArticleL4, 2land 300 A of the constitutionof India and consequentlydirect the 3'd Respondentnot to supply the petroleum products to Respondents5 & 6 and pass such otherorder or orders as thisHon'bleCou rt may deem fit and properin the circumstancesof the case "'
r
2
l\s ar sequel, the miscellaneous p€ titions, if any, pr:nrliro in the Writ petition shall also stand ctos€,d
SI)/-MOHD. ISMAIL AgSlrSTr\NT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY//
To,
, S[:CTION OFFICER
1 one c;c to s;Rt. G MADHUSUDHAN REDDv nou,,.Il" lopuc] .2 One C:C to liRl. C HAR| PREETH Advocate tOpUCl 3 One CC to tlRl. THOOM SRINTVAS Advocate [OplJC] 4 Two CD Co I es KI(S
GJP %
HIGH COIJIRT
)
DATED: 1?JA21Z02S
.,1 t r' r: f.i i.5
a,l
,.;
l-r fl,r JUN 20?5
<br>.',5
t" . d+
t r.-
ORDER
WP.No.4t51l,4 of 2017
DISMISSIIN(; THE WRIT PETITTON AS INFRLIC]'['UOUS WITHOUT'COSTS
v
\6+
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the 3rd respondent's failure to honour its letter dated 24.12.2014 was arbitrary and violative of Articles 14, 21 and 300-A.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Raiender, S/o Narsimlu
Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited, Rep. by its Regional Manager
The General Manager, Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited
The Chief Regional Manager (Retail), Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited
Respondent No.4
Respondents Nos.5 to 7
Surepalli Nanda
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
