Dismissed¶26

Smt. P.S.M. Vijaya v. The Director of Medical Education

Telangana HC17 Feb 2025WP/4407/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Telangana High Court writ petition dismissed as withdrawn without costs; no ruling on merits. Keywords: subsistence allowance; order of suspension; Proceedings Rc.No.50016/VC.A/2024 dated 26.09.2024; Director of Medical Education, State of Telangana; Government Medical College Sangareddy; Gandhi Hospital Secunderabad; Nursing Tutor; Principal under suspension; writ of mandamus; Article 226; Articles 14, 16 and 21; Section 151 CPC interim application; IA No.1 of 2025; withdrawal of petition; Justice Namavarapu Rajeshwar Rao; Sri P.V. Krishnaiah; GP for Services-I; decided 17-02-2025.

What did the court decide?

No substantive relief; writ petition dismissed as withdrawn on the prayer of petitioner's counsel, with no order as to costs and pending miscellaneous applications, if any, closed as a sequel. ¶26

Smt. P.S.M. Vijaya Vs The Director of Medical… — Writ and Judicial Review | Telangana HC (2025)

¶1

[³³⁰⁴ ]

¶2

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶3

MONDAY, THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NAMAVARAPU RAJESHWAR RAO

¶6

WRIT PETITION NO:4407 OF 2025

¶7

Between:

¶8

Smt. P.S.M. Vijaya, D/o Sri P.S. Mithra Aged 60 years, Occ. Principal (Under Suspension) Nursing Tutor School of Nursing Gandhi Hospital, Secunderabad

¶9

...PETITIONER AND

¶10

The Director of lVledical Education, State of Telangana, Sultan Bazar Koti, Hyderabad

¶11

The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Secretary lt Government Health, Medical and Family Welfare Ddpartment Secretariat Building, Hyderabad.

¶12

3.^-Dr. N. Vani, Principal, Government tVledical College, Sangareddy, sangareddy District

¶13

...RES'.NDENTS

¶14

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to grant appropriate relief more in the nature of Writ of Mandamus under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia declaring the action of the official respondents not paying subsistence allowance to the petitioner in pursuance of order of suspension issued by the^'lst respondent by Proceedings Rc.No.50016/VC.Al2O24, dated 26.09.2024 as arbitrary, illegal, discriminatory, malaf ide, unco nstitutiona l, violating Articles^'14,'1 6 and 2 1 of the Constitution of lndia, and issue consequential direction directing the Respondents No.'1 and 2 to forthwith pay and release subsistence allowance to the Petitioner in pursuance of suspension of the petitioner by Proceedings Rc.No.50O16IVC.N2024, dated 26.09.2024 and further direct the 2nd respondent to recover the same from the 3rd respondent.

¶15

lA NO: 1 OF 2025

¶16

Petition under section 15'l cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased to direct the 1st and 2nd respondents to forthwith pay the subsistence allowance to the petitioner in pursuance of the order of suspension issued by the 1st respondent by Proceedings Rc.No.50016/ vc.At2o24, dated 26.09.2024 and further direct the 2nd respondent to recover the same from the 3rd respondent. pending disposal of this Writ Petition.

¶17

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI p.V.KRISHNAIAH Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 & 2: Gp FOR SERVICES I Counsel for the Respondent No.3: --

¶18

The Court made the following: ORDER

¶19

=:=---w.4' :', *7
.,,

¶20

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE NAMAVARAPU RAJESHWAR RAO

¶21

WRIT PETITION No.44O7 OF 2025

¶22

ORDER:

¶23

Sri P.V. Krishnaiah, learnect counsel for the^petitioner seeks

¶24

permission of this Court tc withdrarnr the oresent writ petitlon.

¶25

Permission is accord ed

¶26

Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed as urithdrawn.

¶27

There shall be no order as to costs

¶28

As a sequel,. miscellaneous applications^pendhg, if ary, in Lhis

¶29

Writ Petition, shall stand closed

¶30

SD/. P.Ch. NAGABHUSHAMBA SS TANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY//

--:--__

SECTION OFFICER

1 One CC to SRI P.V.KRtSHNA|AH. Advocate tOp 2 Two CCs to Gp FOR SERVTCES_i, Hign Cou;iio r the State of Telangana, at Hyderabad. [OUTI .). Two CD Copies PSK. GJP f*-

HIGH COURT

DATED:1710212025

ORDER

WP.No.4407 of 2025

9F rEq
e 1
tr'
.9
.\ ('
r-:' d\
$'
._)
,t,,.\ I l-l ), c(

¶41

DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS WITHDRAWN WITHOUT COSTS { ra6 3o {

Smt. P.S.M. Vijaya v. The Director of Medical Education

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Smt. P.S.M. Vijaya v. The Director of Medical Education

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Tipparaveni Rajendra Prasad Vs The State of Telangana

B. Manemma Vs The State of Telangana

D. Manohar Vs The State of Telangana

K.Mallikarjuna Vs The State of Telangana

P. Saraswathi Vs The State of Telangana

G.Upender Reddy Vs The State of Telangana