Petitioners sought recognition as protected tenants and incorporation of their names in revenue records for agricultural land. The writ petition was disposed of granting liberty to approach the competent civil court for declaration of title, without costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[3302 ]
IN THE HIGHCOURTFOR THE STATEOF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (SPecial Original Jurisdiction)
MONDAY, THEFOURTEENTHDAY OF JULY TWO THOUSANDANDTWENTY FIVE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLESRIJUSTICEK. SARATH
WRIT PETITION NO:43037 0F 2017
Between:
(PetitionersOandTrepresentedbytheirGPAholder'PetitionerNo5herein)
AND
....,RESPONOENTS
a .,fa(EE- /
Petition UnderArticle226 of the Constitutionof lndia prayingthat in the circumstancesstated in the affidavit filed therewith,the High Courtmay be pleased to issue a writ ororder or direction, more preferably in the natureof Writ of fVlandamus, declaringthe inaction on the part of the 2nd respondent in not disposing of therepresentationof the petitionerdated 11-10-2017 as illegal' arbitrary andu nconstitutio nal, being violativeof Articles14' 21 and 300-Aof the Constitution oflndia and also violative of Principles of natural justiceand consequentlydirect the respondentsto issue proceedings recognizing the petitioners as ProtectedTenantsandincorporate the names of the petitionersin allrevenuerecords,inrespectofthelandadmeasuringAc'9-14Gts'inSy'Nos' 3,43andl05ofMedipallyVillageandMandal,lrilalkajgiritVedchalDistrict'
|.A.NO:1 OF2017 (WPMP.NO:53362 0F 20171
PetitionUnderSectionl5lCPCprayingthatinthecircumstancesStatedin the affidavitfiled in support of the petition, the High Court maybe pleased to direct the 2nd respondentto dispose of the representationof the petitioners dated 11-10 -2017 withina specified period, preferably in four weeks' pending disposal of the writpetition,in the interest of iustice'
Counsel for thePetitioners: SRI N.PANDAIAH
Counsel for theRespondents: GP FOR REVENUE
The Court made thefollowing ORDER
r.dEFF=iF
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.SARATH
MIT PETITION No.43O37 OF 2017
ORDER:
Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue for the
respondents and perused the entire material on record.
Writ Petition shall stand closed.
SD,-P PONNA KRISHNA idrnurREclsrRAR //TRUECOPY//
SECTTONOFFICER
to ,. ,n" Principal Secretary' .Revenue Department' Secretariat'State of " i"Lnqrnu at HYderahad' 2 rhe DistrictcorrectoJ]firrto"hal- IvlalkajgiriDi:''ji:tat Keesara'
/6tT
...=,rt,-
REVENUE, Hish court for: the State of reransana at Iy.""r"rt:" Slii6 7 ilS 3B to sRr w.-r,nruoAtAH. Advocate [opUC] SA GJP
HIGH COURT
DATED:1410712025
\
(o$ l liL i: .l /..S
e
oa
3 0 JtlL 216 ,)
'ti
* Or JipA f Cl rE\l
ORDER
WP.No.43A37 of 2017
DISPOSING OF THE W.P
WITHOUT COSTS.
w
1 provisions across 1 enactments
P.V.L. Narasimha Rao
P. Radhakishan Rao
Smt. P. Pramedla
P. Pradeep Chandra
P. Ram Mohan Rao
P. Shyam Sundar Rao
K. Sarath
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
