Ambedkar Balaheena Vargala Seva Samithi Vs The State of Telangana

Ambedkar Balaheena Vargala Seva Samithi, (A.P. Regd. No.'1917/96 T.S.) Rep. by its State President, Sri P. Venkataiah, S/o. P. Lachaiah, Age about 50 years, Occ Labour, R/o. H. No.4-47, Dasaigudem Village, Suryapet Mandal and District^- 508213

¶10

...PETITIONER

¶11

AND

¶12

I The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Chief Secretary, Social Welfare, Secretariat Buildings, Saifabad, Hyderabad

¶13

2 The State of Telangana, Department of Social Welfare, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Secretariat Buildings, Saifabad, Hyderabad

¶14

3 Telangana Scheduled Castes Co-Operative Development Corporation Ltd., sth Floor, Damodaram Sanjeevaiah Samkshema Bhavan, lt/asab Tank, Hyderabad - 500 028. Rep. by its lVlanaging Director

¶15

4 District Scheduled Castes Service Co-Operative Development Society Ltd., Suryapet, lntegrated Collectorate Complex, Suryapet

¶16

5 District Scheduled Castes Service Co-Operative Development Society Ltd, ., Nalgonda,Samkshema Bhavan, Collectorate Complex Back side, Miryalguda Road, Nalgonda.

¶17

6 The District Collector, Suryapet Disrtict, Telangana State.

¶18

7 The District Collector, Nalgonda Disrtict, Telangana State.

¶19

...RESPONDENTS

¶20

Petition under Article 226 of lhe Constitution of lndia^praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction, more in the nature of Mandamus, declaring the inaction of the 3rd respondent in not considering the representation dated 09.01.2025 and the 1st respondent in not considering the representation dated 10.01 .2025 made by the^petitioner as illegal, arbitrary and

¶21

I

¶22

contrary to Article 14, and 21 of the Constitution of lndia and consequently to direct the 3rd respondent to consider the representation dated 09.01.2025 and the 1st respondent to consider the representation dated 10.01 .2025 made by the petitioner and to release funds under Telangana Dalit Bandhu Scheme to the members of the petrtioner society.

¶23

lA NO: 1 OF 2025

¶24

Petition under Section^'151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High eourt may be pleased to drrect the 3rd respondent to consider the iepresentation dated 09:01.2025 and the 1st respondent to consider the representation dated 10.01 .2025 made by the petitioner, pending disposal of the main writ petition.

¶25

Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI SANNIDHIRAJA MALLESWARA RAO

¶26

Counsel for the Respondents No.1&2 : GP FOR SOCIAL WELFARE

¶27

Counsel for the Respondents No.3to5 : SRI SRINIVAS NAIK, SC FOR TSCCDCL Counsel for the Respondents No.6to7 : GP FOR REVENUE

¶28

The Court made the following: ORDER

¶29

I

¶30

E

¶31

HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE SUREPALLI NANDA

¶32

WRIT PETITION 0.4284 0F 2025

¶33

ORDER:

¶34

Heard Sri S.Malleswara Rao, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, learned Government Pleader for Social Welfare appearing on behalf of the respondent Nos.1 and 2, Sri Srinivas Naik, learned Standing Counsel for Telangana Scheduled Castes CoOperative Development Corporation Ltd., appearing on behalf of the respondent Nos.3 to 5 and the learned Government Pleader for Revenue appearing on behalf of the respondent Nos.6 and 7.

¶35

2. The^petitioner approached the Court seekinq^prayer

¶36

as under:

¶37

"...to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction, more in the nature of Mandamus, declaring the inaction of the 3'd respondent in not considering the representation dated 09.01.2025 and the 1't respondent in not considering the representation dated 10.01.2025 made by the petitioner as illegal, arbitrary and contrary to Article 14, and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently to direct the 3'd respondent to consider the representation dated 09.01.2025 and the 1't respondent to consider the representation dated

I
<br>

2

*p 42s4 tuj

10.01.2025 made by the petitioner and to release funds under Telangana Dalit Bandhu Scheme to the members of the petitioner society and pass such other order or orders In the interest. of justice.,,

¶42

The case of the petitioner, in brief, is that the members of the petitioner society, who are economically weaker, have applied seeking financial assistance under the^..Telangana Dalit Bandhu Scheme", however, no financial assistance had been granted to them as on date. The petitioner submitted a written representation dated 09.01.2025 to the respondent No.3 and another representation dated 10.01.2025 to the respondent No.1 requesting to release funds under Telangana Dalit Bandhu Scheme to the petitioner's society members, however, no action had been taken on the said reprebentations by the respondent Nos.1 and 3 as on date. Aggrieved by the same, the petitioner filed the present writ petition.

¶43

Learned Government^pleader for Social Welfare submits that the writ petition could be disposed of directing the respondents to consider the grievance of the petitioner as put forth by the petitioner vide the said representations dated 09.01.2025 and 10.01.2025 in accordance to law, within a reasonable period.

¶44

SN,J w_4284²⁰²⁵

¶45

I

¶46

5. Taking into consideration;

¶47

a) The aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case,

¶48

b) The submissions made by the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader for Social Welfare appearing on behalf of the respondent Nos.1 and 2,

¶49

c) The contents of the representation of the petitioner dated O9.O1.2025 addressed to the respondent No.3 and the contents of the representation of the petitioner dated 10.O1.2025 addressed to the respondent No.1 and,

¶50

d) The fact that the said representations are pending for consideration by the respondent Nos.1 and 3 as on date,

¶51

The writ petition is disposed of directing the respondent No,3 to consider the petitioner's representation dated 09.O1,2025 and the respondent No.1 to consider the petitioner's representation dated 1O.O1.2025 seeking release of funds to the members of the petitioner society under Tetangana Dalit Bandhu

¶52

4

¶53

SN,J wp-4284 202s

¶54

Scheme in accordance to law within a period of two(2) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order and duly communicate the decision to the petitioner. However, there shall be no order as to costs.

¶55

As a sequel, the miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, in the Writ petition shall also stand ctosed.

¶56

SD/.S. MALLIKARJ UNA RAO ASSIS REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY//

¶57

To, S CTION OFFICER

¶58

' Iffi":r?:l^{tecretary,state of .Tetangana,Secretariat} Buirdinss, saifabad,

¶59

' 33:.5H:'i31,,ffi;".lgdl:5, fi"l5[tge",,^Departmenr of sociar werfare,

¶60

The Managing Dire

¶61

s:kffi *sr #!:r, i:f;'ffi .fbs1;:lHffEn ffi sffi,lrn

¶62

ol[",S1.,.y#"i:li&y:,1fd:lB:,;,:"H.&ffi

¶63

f{"d;ry;r"?eve,opmenrsociety

¶64

'il+;,:1iil,ffi ,i,dl$..#"Bn??t,if "&i;??,i,r#".,8,3f ,E:i,"Sl8Y

¶65

The District Collector, Survanpt T)ierri^t r^r^^__,

¶66

7 rhe D strct co ecror, ^ff:ff:l:J: l:il:;:::':

¶67

One CC to SRt SANNIDHTRAJA TUALLESWARA RAO, Advocate. tOpUCl 9 9f CC to SRt SRIN|VAS NA|K, SC for TetanoarSRIN|VAS NA|K, SC for TetanoarSC for Tetanoarfor TetanoarTetanoar

¶68