Simala Srivani Vs The State of Telangana

Simala Srivani, Wo. D.Surendranath^{Reddy' Aged 35 years,O-cc Pvt'} Service, R/o.H.No. 7-80t1133, Plot^{No 33, Street No.4, SalTirumala Enclave,} Dammaiguda, Medchal Malkajgiri District,^{State of Telangana}

¶10

...PETITIONER

¶11

AND

¶12

'1 . The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Principal Secretary,. Panchayat Raj And Rural Developmen[ Department, Secretariat,^Hyderabad.

¶13

The Gram Panchayat rep by^{its Secretary, Dammaiguda, Keesara Mandat,} lvledchal Malkajgiri District.

¶14

The Chief Engineer, Office^{of the Superintending Engineer, TSSPDECL' Opp'} Survey of lndia, P and T Colony,^{Uppal. Hyderabad.}

¶15

The Assistant Engineer, ISSPDCL,^{Jai Jawan Colony, S O.' Secunderabad-} 500 103

¶16

C.T. of R2 is amended as^per court^{order dated1310312019in l'A212019'}

¶17

...RESPONDENTS

¶18

Petition under Article 226 of the^{constitutionof lndia praying that in the} circumstances stated in the affrdavit^{filed therewith, the High court may be} pleased to issue a writ, order or direction^{more particularlyone in the nature. of} Writ of Mandamus declaring the action^{of the respondentsNo. 2 to 4 in not acting} upon the^petitioners representation^{dated08-01-2019for sanction of streetlight at} the dead end of street^No 4 on^{the east side of drainage and the south sideof} Plot No.33, H.No. 7-80/1/33, Street^{No.4,Sai TirumalaEnclave, Dammaiguda'} Mtedchal Malkajgiri District is^{illegal,arbitraryand consequently direct the} respondents to consider the representation^{dated 08-01-201I of the petitioner.}

¶19

'I4^.

¶20

lA NO: 1 OF 2019

¶21

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to consider the representation dated 08.01.2019 for sanction of street lighi at the dead end of Street No.4. on the east side of drainage and the south side of PIot No.33, H.No 7- 80/1/33, Street No.4, Sai Tirumala/ Enclave, Danrmaiguda l,4edchal Malkajgiri District forthwith pending the disposal of the above writ petition

¶22

lA NO: 2 OF 2019

¶23

Petitron under Sectiorr 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated rn the affrdavit frled rn support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to permrt me to amend the cause trtle of the writ petition i.e., Respondent No.2 from The Secretary, Grampanchayat Dammaiguda, Keesara Mandal, MedchalMalkajgiri Drstrict to 1'he Grampanchayat, Rep. by its Secretary, Dammaiguda, Keesara Mandal, [t4edchal-l\ilalkalgiri District pending the disposal of the above writ petition

¶24

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI M. VENKATESWARI

¶25

Counsel for the Respondent No.1: GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ & RURAL DEVELOPMENT

¶26

Counsel for the Respondent No.2: SRI G. NARENDER REDDY

¶27

Counsel for the Respondent No.3 & 4: SRI R. VINOD REDDY, SC FOR TSSPDCL

¶28

The Court made the following: ORDER

¶29

THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE T. MADHAVI DEVI WRIT PETITION No.4051 of 2019

¶30

ORDER:

¶31

This Writ Petition is tlled seeking a declaration that the action ol- respondents No.2 to 4 in not acting upon his representation^dated 08.01.2019 seeking to sanction street light at the dead end of Street No.4, on thc east side of drainage and the south side of PIot No.33, H.No.7-80/l/33, Street No.4. Sai Tirurnala Enclave,^Dammaiguda, Medchal-Malkajgiri District, is itlcgal and arbitrary and^consequently to direct the respondents to consider thc representation of^the petitioner dated 08.0 I .201 9 and to pass such other order^{or orders.}

¶32

ln spite of service crf notice on the^{petitioner,therels no} appearance on behalf of the pctitioner-

¶33

It is noticed that the petitioner's requesl^{was only} to^sanction street light at the dead end of Street No.4, on^{the east side of drainage} and the south side of Plot No.33, H.No.7-8011133,^{StreetNo.4, Sai} Tirumala Enclave, Dammaiguda, Medchal-Malkajgiri^District,and that the representation was made^{in the year 2019. Therefore, this} Court is of the opinion that the^{prayerin this Writ Petition itself would}

¶34

have become infructuous.

I!

s

TMD,J wP 405 I 2019

2

Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed as^infiuctuous.

¶40

However, liberry is^granted to the^{petitionet'toseek recall of this order} if causc iLr the Writ Petition sut'r'ives.^{There shall be no ordcras to}

¶41

CoStS

¶42

Misccllaneous applications. if any,^{pendingin this Writ Petition,}

¶43

shall stand c losed

¶44

SD/-K. MADHAVI A SI TANT REGISTRAR

¶45

,TRUE COPY'

¶46

ECTION OFFICER

¶47

To, 1 One CC to SRI NI VENKATESWARI, Advocate [OPUC] - 2 o;; cC io Snt^{G. NARENDERREDDY,AdvocatetOl-U-Cl} ^- 3 o;; aa i; SCi^{R vlNoDREDDY, sc ror rssPDClloigql-.} ; i;; cc.iJcp^{FoRPANCHAYATRAJ& RURAL DEVELoPMENT'Hish} Court for the State^{of Telangana.} [OUT]

¶48