Smt. Boda Ramana Vs the State of Telangana

¶1

[^325s ]

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR^{THE STATEOF TELANGANA} AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶3

IV1ONDAY,THE TWENTY NINTH^{DAY OF DECEMBER} TWO THOUSAND AND^TWENTYFIVE

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HONOURABLE SRI^{JUSTICE N.V.SHRAVAN KUMAR}

¶6

WRIT PETITIO^{N NO: 39934OF 2025}

¶7

Between:

¶8

Smt. Boda Ramana.^{W/o.HariBabu,Aged about 58 yearsOcc' Agriculture} .^R/o i flo Zi-f f til. Near^{nnlan-ya Swam/Temple. Paivancha lvlandal.Bhadradri} Kothagudem District.^{TelanganaState.}

¶9

...PETITIONER

¶10

AND

¶11

1 THE STATE OF^{TELANGANA,Repby rts PrrncipalSecretary} l-loT" Dr.B R.Anrbedkar Telangana^{State Secretariat.KhairtabadHyderabad}

¶12

2 The Sub lnspector of^{Police, Palvancha Mandal Rural Police Station'} Bhad radri Kothagudem^District.

¶13

...RESPONDENTS

¶14

Petitron under Article^{226 of the Constitutionof lndiapraying that in the} circumstances stated^{in the affidavit filedtherewith, the High court maybe} pleased to issue a writ, order^{or direction moreparticularly one in the nature of} Writ of tr/andamus^{declaring action of the respondentNo.2 in not protectingmy} lile and propertyⁱ e^land ii^{Sy tlo. B17 tAl| to an extentof Ac 5 00 situated at} Palvancha .Revenue jurisdiction, Palvancha tt/andal, Bhadradri Kothagudem District from the trespassers^{as illegal,arbitrary and in violationof Principlesof} NaturalJUStiCeandinviolationofArticlesl4,l6,lg,2land300.4ofConstitution oi LnOi" Consequently^{directthe respondentNo 2 to protect the petitioner's life} and property from^{the-handsof trespassersby following procedureof law to lead} llfe without any^{interruptionandnot disturb the agricullure of the petitioner'sland} i,e.landinSy.No'SlTtAtltoanextentofAc.5.00SituatedatPaIvanchaRevenue jurisdiction, Palvancha tvlandal, Bhadradri^{KothagudemDistrict'}

¶15

l/\ NO: 1 OF 2025

¶16

Petition under Sectron^{151 CPC praying thatin the circumstancesstated in} tt're affrdavit^{filed in support of the p"iition, ine Uign Court maybe pleased.to} drrect the respondent^{No. 2 to protectthe life of the petitloner and propertyie'} landinSy.No,SlTlAtltoanextentofAc.5.00SituatedatPalvanchaRevenue

¶17

jurisdiction, Palvancha lt4andal, Bhadradri Kothagudem^{Distri : from the handsof} ir""pr.."r. by following^{procedure of law, pendingdispos z of the main writ} petitton.

¶18

Counsel for the Petitioner(s):SRl.^{VENKATA RAGHU MANN - )ALLI}

¶19

Counsel for the Respondent's^{No's 1 & 2 : GP FORHOME}

¶20

The Court made the^{following:ORDER}

¶21

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

¶22

AT HYDERABAD

¶23

HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.V.SHRAVAN KUMAR

¶24

WRIT PETITIO N No.39 934 of 2025

DATE:29.12.2O 25

Between:

Smt. Boda Rmana

.....Petitioner

AND

The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Home Dr. B.R. Ambedkar Telangana State Secretariate, Khairtabad, Hyderabad.

¶31

. . Respondents

¶32

ORDER

¶33

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Assistant

¶34

Government Pleader for Home appearing for respondent Nos.1 and 2. With their consent, this writ petition is being taken up for disposal at the admission stage itself.

¶35

2 This writ petition has been filed seeking the following prayer:-

¶36

"to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nafure of writ of Mandamus dectaring action of the respondent No.2 in not protecting my life and property i.e. land in Sy.No.877 / A/.1to an extent of Ac.5.00 situated at Palvancha Revenue Jurisdiction, palvancha Mandal, Bhadradri Kothagudem District from the trespassers as illegal, arbitrary and in violation of principles of Natural Justice and in violation of Articles L4, 16, 19 and 21 and 300-4 of Constitution of Inrlia, Consequently direct the respondent No.2 to protect the petitioners life and properw from the hands of trespassers by following procedure of iaw to lead life without any interruption ani not disturb the agriculture of the petitione/s land i.e. land h

¶37

2

¶38

Sy.No.817/A/1 to an extent of Ac.5.00 situated^{at Palvar} :ha Revenue .stIict." jurisdiction, Palvancha Mandal, Bhadradri Kothagudem i

¶39

The brief facts of the casc are that the petitioner is^c rltivating Meraka land bearing Sy.No.B17 / A/L, admeasurinB Ac.5.00, sitt^z :ed in Palvancha Revenue iurisdiction, Palvancha Mandal, Bhadradri^Kotha 1 tdem Dishict. She maintained Jamoil trees over the said land for^{the part rr} rre than 30 years. On an application by Smt Kalva Bayamma, the^Tahsildar, 'alvancha^Mandal conducted a detailed enquiry with the help of the^{Village ['r} venue Oflicer and submitted a report dated 15.M.2015 recorcling^{the namer} f Boda Haribabu, the petitioner's husband, in the revenuc records.^Subsequl Ltly, the petitioner and her husband continued posscssion and^enioymento1 the iand without interruption. Recentll,, 4 to 5 persons came^{to the pet} ioner's land and threatened her with dire consequences. On^{05.12.2025,the} 1 :titioner informed respondent No.2 and submitted a rcpresentation^bel< :c the Tahsiidar, PalvAncha Mandal, and requestiug -action against^thc trespassers. The petitioner submitted all relevant documents to^{responj:nt No.2, and he} received the same. However,^he clid not register^{anv crimI al caseagainst the} trespassers and did not take action as per law. RespoIrrl^{nt No.2 has been} repeatedly calling the petitioner and her husband^{ancle s <ingfor the same} documents which were already submitted, without^{regist' ring any FIR. The} petitioner states that respondent No.2 neglected^{his d lies and failedto} protect the rigtrts and dignity of the petitioner from the tt^{lds of tresPassers.} Aggrieved by the same, the petitioner filed the present wr t petition.

¶40

3

¶41

\Arhen the matter is taken up for hearing, learned courlsel for the petitioner vehemently submits that subsequent to the f ing of the writ petition, respondent No.2 has considered the complaint and has initiated action in the matter

¶42

Lcarned counsel for the respondent ciid not oppose the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner.

¶43

In view of the submissions made by learned counsel appearing on either side and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, this writ petition is disposed of directing respondent No.2 to follow the due procedure as contemplated undcr law for further course of action.

¶44

7 With thc above direction, this writ petition is disposed of. Miscellaneous applications, if any pending, shall stand closed. No

¶45

order as to costs

¶46

,TRUE COPY//

¶47

SD/-AHMED ABDULLAH KHAN ASSISTANT REGISTRAR G

¶48

SECTION OFFICER

¶49

To,