Petitioners alleged police interference in a pending civil suit over plots, at the instance of unofficial respondents. The court directed police not to interfere in the civil dispute or summon the petitioners, protected lawful police action, and dismissed the writ petition as infructuous without costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
t32171
IN THE HIGH COURTFOR THE STATEOF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY,THE NINTH DAYOF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND ANDTWENTYFIVE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICEN.TUKARAMJI
WRIT PETITION NO: 3 92420F 2017
Between:
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article226 of lhe constitutionof lndiapraying that in the circumstances stated inthe affidavit filed therewith,the High court may be pleased to issue an appropriatewrit, order or Direction, more particularlyonein the nature of writ ofMandamus,to declare the action of the 3rd respondent in calling thepetitioners tothe police station at the behestof unofficial Respondent Nos. 4 to 7 and threateningto handoverthe plots allottedto them' whenthe suit o.S.No. 231 of2015is pending on the file of the Principal Juniorcivil Judge at Gadwal and therebycausing interference in the civil disputes,as beingillegal, arbitrary and uncon stitutionaland consequentlydirect the 2nd respondentherein
to take action against the 3'd respondent for causing his ir erference in the civil disputes
l.A. NO: I OF 2017(WPMP. N O: 48672 OF 20171
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the ircumstances stated in the affidavrt filed in support of the petition, the High Co- t may be pleased to direct the 3'd Respondent herein not to interfere in the C i il disputes including the personal life and liberty of the Petitioners, in any ma.nnr: pending disposal of the marn Writ Petition
Counsel for the Petitioners: SRI T. PARIPURNA CHARY
Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 1to3: AGP FOR HOME
Counsel for the Respondent Nos.4to7:--
The Court made the following: ORDER
THE HONOURABLESRI JUSTICE N.TUKARAMJI
I
WRIT PETITIO NNo.39 242 0F 2017
ORDER:
This Writ Petitionis hled underArticle 226 of Constitutton of tndia seekingthe following relief/s:-
appearing forrespondentNos.1 to 3
lrII
I I !
2
(). Having regard to the asscrtions made by thc ,etitioncrs and l<ccping in vie r,", l he lirnited scope ol police intervt:n ion in matters ol at civil nalurc. the respondent Policc authorit :s are hereby dirccted to refrain lrom in[erfering in the civil : sputes of the p('litioncrs. The -espondents shall not insist upor he pctiliuners to hand over an\ plot or slrmmon them to the rolice st:rtio n. Ho,,r,.cver, anr. aclion takcn bv the rcspondent Polit r authoritics in sLI'ir:t accorclattr:t' ivith lau' 2nd follo,.rring duc prpc t ;s shall stand protccted-
Miscellaneous Pctitions, pending if any, shal irartd closed
SD/. A.JAYASREE ..<ASI;STANT REGISTRAR
//TRUE COPY//
SECTION OFFICER
To,
1 One CC to SRl. L PARIPURNA CHARY, Advocate [OP JC] 2. fwo CCs to GP FOR HOME ,High Court for the State . Telangana at Hyderabad [OUT 3. Two CD Copies
BM PSK \cv
HIGH COURT
DATED:0911012025
ORDER
WP.No.39242 of 2017
i
I
s
€ )
* 0 3 ::B 71l?[
* *
DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS IIIFRUCTOUS WITHOUT COSTS
6ocqtt"'w. 6-(2!
1 issue framed by the court
Whether police could summon petitioners and threaten to take allotted plots at the behest of private respondents while a civil suit was pending?
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Maddileti
Sriram Vini @ Noori Joseph
Sh. Sakhavai Achari
The State of Telangana, rep by its Principal Secretary, Home Department
The Superintendent of Police, Jogulamba Gadwal District
The Station House Officer, Ieeja Police Station, Jogulamba Gadwal District
N. Tukaramji
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
