Disposed

Mohd. Jaffar Ali v. The State of Telangana

Telangana HC10 Feb 2025WP/3748/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Retired driver's writ petition seeking release of gratuity, commutation and leave encashment amounts pending since retirement. Government Pleader stated bills were processed but payment delayed due to paucity of funds. Court disposed of petition directing release within eight weeks.

What did the court decide?

Respondents directed to release and pay all retirement benefit amounts within eight weeks from receipt of a copy of the order.

Mohd. Jaffar Ali Vs The State of Telangana — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Telangana HC (2025)

¶1

[³³⁰⁴ ]

¶2

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Originat Jurisdiction)

¶3

MONDAY, THE TENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NAMAVARAPU RAJESHWAR RAO

¶6

WRIT PETITION NO: 3748 0F 2025

¶7

Between:

¶8

' Moh9.^{Jaffar Ari, s/o-. Shaik Ari, age.61} vears, Retd. Driver, chief Judicial vqgtfrlu^{cumprr. s.eniorcivir Judgesc.iurt,} rr,laniuuonasli. nv"l'n.rvi, r- S-1 191 1 I A, Simhagiri Colony, MahabJbnagar-50900.1

¶9

...PETIT|oNER AND

¶10

The State of Telanqana, rept. by its Spl. Chief Secretary, Finance and

¶11

^^{PlanningDepartme"nt,S;cretaii;t.'i.ltE;r;;;;-}

¶12

The Director of Treasuries and AccounG. lniurance Building, Abids, Hyderabad.

¶13

The District Treasury officer,, .rvahaboobnagar, Mahaboobnagar District. 4 The Sub-Treasury officer, [\4ahaboobnagar,"vinaboobnaoai"oirtrili^-'

¶14

c. rne Hnncrpar Drstrict and Session Judge, Mahaboobnagaf Mahaboobnagar Diskict.

¶15

(Respondent No.S in Formal party)

¶16

...RESPONDENTS

¶17

Petition under Articre 226 of the constitution of rndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fired therewith, the High court may be pleased to issue an order or direction or writ, more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus, decrare the impugned action of the respondents in not releasing and paying Gratuity (TS) amount of Rs.4,47,553/_ with TOKEN No.15699598, dt. 251612024 and Gratuity (cS) amount of Rs. 10,27,927t- with Token No.'15699582, dt.25i612024, commutation (TS) amount ot Rs.4,29,202rwith roken No.15699637, dt. 2\t6l2o24 and commutation (cs) amount of Rs. 9,85'7791- with roken No.15699615, dt. 28t6t2024, Finar Encashment of Leaves/HPL of Rs. 10,10,466/- with roken No. 2s14s36332, dt. 191612024, is illegal, arbitrary, unfair, unjust, discrimination, apart from vioration of aI the statutory Rules and constitutionar provisions and consequenfly direct the respondents to release and pay the Gratuity (TS) amount of Rs.4,47,553/-with TOKEN No.15699598, dt. 2sr6r2o24 and Gratuity (cS) amount or Rs. 10,27 ,927r-

¶18

with Token No.1 5699582, dt.251612}24, Commutation (TS) amount of Rs.4,29,2O21- with Token No.15699637, dL. 281612024 and Commutation (CS) amount of Rs. 9,85,779l- with Token No.15699615, dt. 281612024, Final Encashment of Leaves/HPL of Rs.'10,10,466/- with Token No. 2514536332, dt. 191612024, with interest @ 24 Percent per annum from date of retirement to till the date of actual payment is made.

¶19

lA NO: 1 OF 2025

¶20

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to release and pay the Gratuity (TS) amount of Rs.4,47,5531 with TOKEN No.15699598, dt.251612024 and Gratuity (CS) amount oI Rs.'1O,27,9271with Token No.15699582, dt.251612024, Commutation (TS) amount of Rs.4,29,2021-with Token No.15699637, dl. 281612024 and Commutation (CS) amount of Rs. 9,85,7791 with Token No.15699615, dt. 281612024, Final Encashment of Leaves/HPL of Rs. 10,10,466/- with Token No. 2514536332, dt. 191612024, to the petitioner forthwith pending disposal of main writ petition.

¶21

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI P.UGENDER REDDY Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 TO 4: GP FOR SERVICES-||| Counsel for the Respondent No.5: --

¶22

The Court made the following: ORDER

¶23

¶24

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE NAMAVARAPU RAJESHWAR RAO

¶25

WRIT PETITION No.3748 OF 2025

¶26

ORDER:

¶27

. With the consent of both the parties, this Writ Petition is taken up for disposal, at the admission stage.

¶28

Heard Mr. P. Ugender Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Government Pleader for Services-Ill for respendent Nos.1 to 4.

¶29

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner retired from service on 30.Q4.2024 and till now, his retirement benefits were not released by the respondents.

¶30

Learned Government Pleader submits that the bills pertaining to the retirement benefits of the petitioner are already processed. However, due to dearth of funds, the amounts could not be release c to the petitioner on time. Learned Government Pleader further submits that as per seriatim of the token numbers, amounts will be released to the beneficia ries.

¶31

Having regard to the above submissions, this Writ petition is disposed of directing the respondents to release and pay the Gratuity (TS) amount of Rs.4,47,553/- with Token No.15699598, dated 25.06.2024 and Gratuity (CS) amount of Rs.10,27,927/- with

¶32

Token No.15699582, dated 25.06.2024, Commutation (TS) amount of Rs.4,29,202/- with Token No.15699637, dated 28.06.2024 and Commutation (CS) amount of Rs.g,BS,77g/_ with Token No.15699615, dated 28.06.2024, Final Encashment of Leaves/Hpl of Rs.10,10,466l- with Token No.25t4536332, dated 19.06.2024, pertaining to the petitioner, as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of eight (B) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. There shall be no order as to costs.

¶33

Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed.

¶34

SD/.T. TIRUMALA DEVI AS S NT REGISTRAR

//TRUE COPYII

CTION OFFICER

The sol. chief Secretary, Finance and pranning Department, Secretariat, ^^{Hyderbbad, State of Teiangana.} 2. The Director of Treasuries-and Accounts, lnsurance Building, Abids, Hyderabad.

¶39

The District r'easurv officer,, .Mahaboobnag_ar, Mahaboobnagar District. 1 IIg :!lneas,ry^{cjfficer,M'ihrb";b;;s;;:iliinalooonasrrDisrrict.} c. tne H,ncrpat District and Session Judge, MahaboobnagaI Mahaboobnagar District.

¶40

Q 9ne^{CC to SRt P.UGENDER} REDDY, Advocate tOpUCl

¶41

Two ccs to GP FoR SERVTCES-il, High court rirr *reEtare of rerangana, at Hyderabad. [OUTj 8. Two CD Copies PSK. BS

HIGH COURT

RRN,J

DATED:1010212025

ORDER

WP.No.3748 of 2025

1 Hf: ST,a. ].t.
$ !^
q
ri
q
.l
2 o itB z$fi
\ ,,,
\t 1_.
erai 1''f
::;::="

¶49

DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS

¶50

(EryO W

Mohd. Jaffar Ali v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mohd. Jaffar Ali v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M. Naresh Vs The State of Telangana

M. Laxminarayana Vs The State of Telangana

P.Naresh Vs The Telangana State Road Transport Corporation

M.Jayasree Vs The State of Telangana

A.Narsaiah Vs The State of Telangana

G. Ganapathi Vs The State of Telangana