Dismissed¶45

Smt. Vijaya v. The State of Telangana

Telangana HC24 Apr 2025WP/36669/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Dismissal as withdrawn; withdrawal of writ petition; writ of mandamus; FIR not registered; registration of FIR; arrest of accused; Article 226; Section 151 CPC; I.A. No.1 of 2024; P.S. Jawahar Nagar; Rachakonda Commissionerate; Medchal-Malkajgiri District; State of Telangana / Home Department; Commissioner of Police Rachakonda; Beeravolu Vijayendra Reddy; Smt. Vijaya; J.K. Ranjit Kumar; GP for Home; High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad; T. Vinod Kumar J.; 24-04-2025; no costs; miscellaneous petitions closed; no merits adjudication - low citability.

What did the court decide?

Permission to withdraw; writ petition dismissed as withdrawn without costs; pending miscellaneous petitions closed. No substantive relief (FIR registration, arrest, investigation) granted. ¶45

Smt. Vijaya Vs The State of Telangana — Writ and Judicial Review | Telangana HC (2025)

¶1

[³¹⁶⁶ ]

¶2

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶3

THURSDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.VINOD KUMAR

¶6

WRIT PETITION NO: 36669 OF 2024

¶7

Between:

¶8

Smt. Vijaya, Wo. Late. R. Pentaaiah, Aged about 58_years,^{Occ. Housewife.} Fl/o. Jawihar Nagar, Thumkunta. Medchbl Malkajgiri District.

¶9

...PETITIONER

¶10

AND

¶11

1 The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Principal Secretary,^{Home Department.} Secretariat Building Hyderabad.

¶12

2 The Commissioner of Police, Rachakonda Commissionerate,^Neredmet, Secunderabad.

¶13

3 The Station House Officer, P.S. Jawahar Nagar, Rachakonda Co mm issio ne rate, Medchal-Malkajgiri District.

¶14

4 Sri. Beeravolu Vijayendra Reddy, S/o.^{RamChandra Reddy, Aged about 70} years, Occ. Business, Rl/o. H. no. 2-17^-81B, 44 SR Heights, Uppal,^Medchal- Malkajgiri District, Hyderabad, Telangana

¶15

...RESPONDENTS

¶16

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia^{praying that in the} circumstances stated in the affidavit^{filed therewith,the High Court maybe} pleased to issue a Writ or direction more^particularly one in the nature of^Writof Mandamus, declaring the action of the Respondent^{No.3in not registering the FIR} in pursuant to the complaint of the^petitioner dated^{2211012024and1711112024} against the accused though the cognizable^{offence committedas ilhgal,arbitrary'} unconstitutional, violative of^Principles of^{naturaljustice and contraryto the} judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court and consequefltly direct the Respondents to register the FIR duly effecting the^arrest of^{the accusedandconduct} investigation by following due^{procedure of law.}

¶17

lA NO: 1 OF 2024

¶18

¶19

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the Writ petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents forthwith to register the FIR against the accused mentioned in the complaint of the Petitioner d1.2211O12O24 and dt.1711112024, pending disposal of the main Writ Petition.

¶20

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI J. K. RANJIT KUMAR

¶21

Counsel for the Respondent nos.1 to 3: GP FOR HOME

¶22

Counsel for the Respondent No.4:--

¶23

The Court made the following: ORDER

¶24

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE T. VINOD KUMAR

¶25

WRIT PETITION 0.36669 oJ 2024