Shaik Kareem v. Union of India
Case brief
What is this about?
Writ Petition No. 36206 of 2024; High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad; Justice Pulla Karthik; decided 09-01-2025; Article 226 Constitution of India; Section 151 CPC; APGVB circular APGVB/Per&HRD/SI/2024-25 dated 22.10.2024; Andhra Pradesh Grameena Vikas Bank (sponsored by State Bank of India); NABARD; Union of India Ministry of Finance; APGVB Messengers; omission of names and stoppage of further selection process; prayer for receipt of educational qualification certificates and regularisation of service pending disposal; similar order as W.P. No. 33929 of 2024 (order dated 09.12.2024); representation to respondent No.3 within two weeks; orders in accordance with law within four weeks; disposed of; miscellaneous applications closed; no costs.
What did the court decide?
Petitioners permitted to make representations to respondent No.3 (Andhra Pradesh Grameena Vikas Bank) for redressal of their grievance within two weeks of receipt of the order; respondent No.3 directed to consider the representations and pass appropriate orders strictly in accordance with law, preferably within four weeks, communicating copies to the petitioners; miscellaneous applications closed; no costs.