Dismissed

Kammari Ramulu v. The State of Telangana

Telangana HC7 Feb 2025WP/3605/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner sought a writ of mandamus directing survey and fixation of boundaries of his land in Sy. No. 951, Patancheru village. Counsel sought withdrawal with liberty to apply for sub-division survey; the Court dismissed the petition as withdrawn without costs.

What did the court decide?

Writ petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file an application seeking sub-division survey; no costs.

Kammari Ramulu Vs The State of Telangana — Land Acquisition | Telangana HC (2025)

¶1

I32e6l

¶2

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF^TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶3

FRIDAY ,THE SEVENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE^{C.V.BHASKARREDDY}

¶6

WRIT PETITION NO: 3605 OF 2025

¶7

Between:

¶8

Kammari Ramulu, S/o. Kammari^{NarayanaAged about. 79} years, Occ. Aqriculture H. No. 2-'109/1 , Near Grama^{Panchayat,Patancheru,} Sangareddy District - 502032 Telangana State

¶9

...PETITIONER

¶10

ANO

¶11

1 The State of Telangana, Rep. by its^{PnncipalSecretary} -(Revenue), Secretariat Building, Khairatabad,^{Hyderabad,Telangana- 5OO022.}

¶12

2 The District Collecior, Sanga Reddy^{District, lntegrated Collectorate Complex,} Sanga Reddy, Telangana^- 502001.

¶13

3 The-Revenu6 Divisional Officer, Sangareddy^{District' Telangana- 502001.} 4 The Tahshildar, Patancheru.^{Patancherumandal,SangareddyDistrict'} Telangana - 502319.

¶14

5 The^"Revenue lnspector, Patancheru,^{Patancherumandal'Sangareddy} District, Telangana^- 502319.

¶15

...RESPONDENTS

¶16

Petition under Article 226 of the^{Constitutionof lndia prayingthat in the} circumstances stated in the affidavit^{filed therewith, the High Court may be} pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order, or direction,^{more particularlyone in} the nature of Writ of Mandamus^{directingthe RespondentNo. 4 to carry out a} survey, localization/fixation of boundaries,^{and classificationof the land and} extent of Petitioners land in Sy. No.^{951 measuringAc.? - 35 Gts. situated at} Patancheru village and Mandal,^{Sangareddy District}

¶17

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRl.^{THAKUR POORNIMA}

¶18

Counsel forthe Respondents:^{GPFOR REVENUE}

¶19

The Court made the following:^ORDER

¶20

i-gi

¶21

HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. BHASKAR REDDY

¶22

WRIT PETITION No.36O5 of 2025

¶23

ORDER:

¶24

After arguing for some time, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdrar.r' the present writ petition with a liberty to file an application seeking sub-division survey in the subject property. He has made an endorsement to the said effect on the bundle.

¶25

Permission is accorded.

¶26

Granting liberty as sought, this Writ Petition is dismissed as

¶27

withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs.

¶28

As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in the Writ Petition shall stand closed.

¶29

SD/-V.KAVITHA ,/ ASS|STANT,$EG|STRAR^/ //TRUE COpy// fi'{ t' - To, SECTION OFFICER I ?,xs 33.%,:ff i8AlKER3Eillufl A1,f?snffii,,?i of re angana a,

¶30

cD colies^' , Iff GJP

HIGH COURT

DATED:0710212025

ORDER

WP.No.3605 of 2025

DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS WITHDRAWN WITHOUT COSTS

¶37

/ 4,4 ./t 1 ./ ra3r/q

Kammari Ramulu v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Kammari Ramulu v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

E.B. Ramulu, Vs The State of Telangana

Asra Sultana Vs The State of Telangana

Vadde Krishna Vs The State of Telangana

Smt.Rukhiya Begum and 17 others Vs Sri M.Thirupathaiah

Mohammed Ibrahim Vs The State of Telangana

Zainab Bee Vs The Joint Collector