Disposed

Md Azgar Pasha v. The State of Telangana

Telangana HC1 Dec 2025WP/36042/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

A Junior Lab Technician filed a writ petition challenging the award of 14 service weightage marks against his entitlement of 20 marks. The High Court disposed of the writ at the admission stage without going into merits, directing the respondent to consider the petitioner's pending representation and pass orders within four weeks.

What did the court decide?

Direction to Respondent No. 2 to consider the pending representation and pass appropriate orders within four weeks.

Md Azgar Pasha Vs The State of Telangana — Service and Employment | Telangana HC (2025)

¶1

[³³⁰¹ ]

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD

¶3

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶4

MONDAY. THE FIRST DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE

¶5

PRESENT

¶6

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE PULLA KARTHIK

¶7

WRIT PETITION NO: 36042 OF 2025

¶8

Between:

¶9

[/d Azgar Pasha, S/o. [V1d. Mohamood, Age. 35 years, Occ. Lab Technician, R/o, H. No. 6-4-183, Gangampet village, Korutla Mandal, Jagtial District, Telangana505326.

¶10

...PETITIONER

¶11

AND

¶12

1 The State of Telangana, Rep, by its Principal Secretary, Health lVledical and Family Welfare (B) Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad.

¶13

2 The Medical Health Service Recruitment Board (MHSRB), Government of Telangana, Rep by its Secretary, Koti, Hyderabad.

¶14

...RESPONDENTS

¶15

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ or order or direction more particularly in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of respondent No.2 in awarding weightage of '14 marks instead of 20 marks to the petitioner in pursuant to recruitment notification vide No. 0312024 dated 1 1 .09.2024 for the post of Lab TechnicianGrade ll issued by Medical Health Services Recruitment Board, Government of Telangana despite receipt of petitioner's written representation dated 25.01 .2025, 20.05.2025 and 21 .11.2025 as being illegal and arbitrary, consequently direct the respondent No. 2 to grant weightage of 20 marks to the petitioner for his service in Government Hospital, Karimnagar in pursuant to recruitment notification vide No. 0312024 dated 11.09.2024 for the post of Lab Technician-Grade ll issued by IVledical Health Services Recruitment Board, Government of Telangana.

¶16

lA NO: 1 OF 2025

¶17

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the⁽⁾ oumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court nr, y be pleased to direct the respondent No. 2 to award weightage of 20 marks to th( petitioner in pursuant to recruitment notificatron vide No. 0312024 dated^'l 1.09.2,) 1,4 for the post of Lab Technician- Grade ll rssued by lvledical Health Servicr: Recruitment Board. Government of Telangana by duly considering service certi i ,ate daled 28.O3.2024 issued by Medical Superintendent District Hospital, Karinrn r;ar pending disposal of this Writ petition.

¶18

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI ALLURI DIVAKAR REDDY

¶19

Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR SERVICES-I

¶20

The Court made the following: ORDER

¶21

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD

¶22

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE PULLA KARTHIK

¶23

WRIT PETITION No.36O42 of 2o25

¶24

Dated lst December, 2O25.

Between:

Md. Azgar Pasha

Petitioner

AND

The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Health, Medical and Family Wellarc (B) Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad, and another.

¶30

Respondents

¶31

ORDER:

¶32

Aggrieved by the action ol rcspondent No.2 in awarding (14) weightage marks to the petitioner, instead of (20) u,eightage marks, as per his entitlement, in pursuance of the Recruitment Notihca[ion No.O3/2024 dated 1 1.O9.2024, for the post of Lab I'echnician Grade-ll, the present writ petition is hled.

¶33

Heard Sri Alluri Divakar Reddy, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, and learned Government Pleader for Services-l, appearing on behalf of the respondents. With their consent, thc q'rit petition is taken up for disposal at admission stage.

¶34

¶35

PK, .I w.P.No.36O42 oJ 2O2J

¶36

Learned coultsel for the petitioner submits thir in pursuance of Recruitment Notification No.O3l2024 dated 11.09.:10 t.t, the petirioner applied for the post of Lab Technician Grade-Il, appear I I arrrl succcssfull-r, clearcd the written examination. l-lowever, while hr: i er]titlecl for (20) service weightagc mzrrks for his (8) ycars' contractll rl scrvicc as Lab Technician in District Hospital, Karimnagar, respondenr lJr>.t2 has zlvarded onl-v (14) service rveightage marks, in spite of the petit ( r,cr t)rodllcing his Service Certilicatc datecl 28.03.2024. Therefore, thc pr rtioncr subrnittcd his representation to respondent No.2 on 2I.71.2025. sci:king au,ard ol (20) service weightage marks. However, no action has _'r:n taken thereon so far.^'l'hereforc, learned counscl seel(s indulgcnce ot i r Ls Court to clirccr rcspondenI No.2 to consider thc said rcprescntation o1' I r: pr:titioner dated 21.11.2025 and to pass recessary orders within a tinrr ianrc as may be stipulated by this Court.

¶37

Learned Government Pleader appearing on behalf , { thc rcspondents submits that on consideration of the objections raisec [:r-y' tl-rc petitioner. ( 14) service weightage marks werc arvarded for his c r n tralctual service. llowever, it is fairly submittecl that since the rcr). srcntation of the pelitioner datcd 21. 11.2025 is pending consideration, ;-t r pon <lcnt No.2 rvill consider the samc and pass appropriatc orders in accorrl irrcc u,iLh larv.

¶38

PK, J W.P.No.36042 of 2025

¶39

¶40

Having regard to the submissions made by learned counsel for the respective parties, without going into merits of the casc, the writ petition is disposed of directing respondent No.2 to pass appropriate orders on the representation of the petitioner dated 21.11.2o2s, stricLly in accordance r.vith Iaw, as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of lour (04) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, and communicate a copy thereof to the petitioner.

¶41

Miscellaneous applications, if any, pending in this ivrit peticion, shail

¶42

stand closed. No costs

¶43

sD/- s. ALLIKARJUNA RAO S TANT REGISTRAR

//TRUE COPY//

SECTION OFFICER

To,

1'ThePrincipalsecretary,HealthtvledicalandFamilyWelfare(B)Department' State of T6langana,^{Secretariat, Hyderabad'}

¶48

The Secretary,^{Medical Health ServiceRecruitment Board(IVHSRB)'} Government 6f^{Telangana, Koti, Hyderabad'}

¶49

One CC to^{SRl. ALLURI DIVAKARREDDY, Advocate [OPUC]}

¶50

4.TwoCCstoGPFoRSERVICES.I,HighCourtfortheStateofTelanganaat Hyderabad . [OUT]

¶51

Two CD CoPies

DAN

GJP

HIGH COURT

DATED:0111212025

ORDER

WP.No.36042 of 2025

'l t: ft
0 B
o
1r ?l'rr( z
tl
t
* Op
\ t.,

¶59

DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION

¶60

WITHOUT COSTS

¶61

ah
b
\

Md Azgar Pasha v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Md Azgar Pasha v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

N S Balachandran Vs The State of Telangana

N.Thukdidas Vs The State of Telangana

Jasti Venkateswarlu Vs The State Of Telangana

G Jessie Vanaja Vs The State of Telangana

V. Jayapal Reddy Vs The State of Telangana

Charkala Linganna Vs The State of Telangana