Writ petition challenging a transfer memo in the Agriculture Department was dismissed as infructuous after counsel stated that due to efflux of time the cause no longer survived for adjudication.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
/.
[3301 ]
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY, THE TWELFTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE PULLA KARTHIK
WRIT PETITION NO: 35855 OF 2018
Between:
K.Ramakrishna, S/o K.Vasudevan, Aged about 51years, Assistant Directorof Agriculture, Kamareddy, Kamareddy District.
..,..PETITIONER
AND
.....RESPONDENTS
Petition Under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndiapraying thatin the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, theHigh Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction, more particularly a writ in the nature of Writ of MANDAMUS declaring the Memo of the1 strespondent i.e., The Commissioner and Director of Agriculture, Opp. L.B.Stadium,Hyderabadissued in No.Al(1 )1675t2018, dated 15-06-20'18, transferring the 3rdrespondentfrom ADA, STO, Rajendranagar to the office of the Commissionerand Directorof Agriculture, Hyderabad specifying the reason of hisretention being a member of Telangana Agri Doctors Association an unrecognizedbody and not considering the case of thepetitioner for transfer inplaceof the 3rd respondent,as bad, illegal, arbitrary, opposed to law.
"E=7
|.A.NO:1 OF 2018
Petition Under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to SUSPEND the memo of the 1st respondent i.e., The Commissioner and Director of Agriculture, Opp. L.B.Stadium, Hyderabad issued in No.A1('1 )/675/2018, dated 15-06-2018 transferring the 3rd respondent from ADA, STO, Rajendranagar to the office of the Commissioner and Director of Agriculture, Hyderabad, pending disposal of the main writ petitron.
Counsel forthe Petitioner : M/s SRI KANYA, ADVOCATE FOR SRI M.VIDYASAGAR
Counsel for the Respondent Nos.'l & 2 : GP FOR AGRICULTURE
Counsel for the Respondent No.3 : SRI A.GIRIDHAR RAO
The Court made the following ORDER
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE PULLA KARTHIK
WRIT PETITION No.3 5655 0F 2018
ORDER:
When the matter is taken up for hearing, Ms.Sri Kanya, learned counsel representing Sri M.Vidyasagar, learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that due to efflux of time the cause in the present Writ Petition does not survive for adjudication and the matter has become infructuous.
Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this Writ Petition, shall stand closed. There shall be no order as to
costs.
\ {
SD/- T. JAYASREE A ISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER
To
SA GJP
HIGH GOURT
DATED:1 210212025
ORDER
.,-. -- a-- -_ --::<br>';u'
z"^ "'' "%.<br>lUli
,3 2 b tlA<br>t
* a
Fs;pAtcll 19
WP.No.35855 of 2018
DISMISSING THE W.P
AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS.
?,o
1 provisions across 1 enactments
K.Ramakrishna
The Commissioner and Director of Agriculture, Hyderabad
State of Telangana, Agriculture and Cooperation (Agr.1) Department
Sri V.lradhu Mohan
Pulla Karthik
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
