Disposed

Jhansi Laxmi v. The State of Telangana

Telangana HC23 Apr 2025WP/3471/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioners sought mandamus restraining authorities from dispossessing them from plots without due process. The Court found no proceedings had been drawn and no strong cause of action had arisen, and disposed of the writ petition, clarifying any eviction must follow law.

What did the court decide?

Writ petition disposed of; clarification that any dispossession must be strictly in accordance with law; no costs; miscellaneous petitions closed.

Jhansi Laxmi Vs The State of Telangana — Property and Title | Telangana HC (2025)

t34471

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD

¶5

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶6

WEDNESDAY,THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE

¶7

PRESENT

¶8

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P.SAM KOSHY ANO

¶9

THE HONOURABLE SRIJUSTICE NARSING RAO NANDIKONDA

¶10

WRIT PETITION NO:3471 OF 2025

¶11

Between:

¶12

Jhansi Laxmi. W/o. pVN Radha Krishna, Aged about 53 years. Occ. Housewife. R/o^ptotlto .16, Sy No 307/4, tr,fiitrlta ltagir, F;a6;thai!aq;, Near Hiil Top Tower, euthbuilapLr Mandar. Medchar-Marki;giri oisir-i.^-"-

¶13

Z 9lnt Bobbrligama Sowjanya, Wo. Bobbiligama Naveen Kumar, Aqed about JU years, Occ. Housewife. R/o.^ptot No. 13, Sy. No. 307/4, Mithjia Naqar, Plqgulnj Ngsqr,^{NearHiil Top Tower, euthbultapui} uahojt, rvteoifirMalkajgiri District.

¶14

3 pyr.a.S-wap1a,^W9, SqrlRaju, Aged ?bout 34 years, Occ. frousewife, R/o. Plot No. ?9, 9y No.307/4,-Mithita.rygggr, pragathi Nagar, Near Hiri rop I ower, Q uthbullapur Mandal, Medchal_Malkajgiri D-istrict.

¶15

V. Varalaxqli !V/o.Y pef Kumar, Aged abOut 3g yeprs, Occ. pvt, fmplgyge.^{R/o plot} !9,.8,^{Sy llq agzn",Mithiri r.ragirl piigrtni-r.rrgli,} Near Hill Top Tower, euthbuilapur Mandat, MeOcnat'-nlai(ajgirlOijtri;i.^---

¶16

5 G. Venkata Subbarao, S/o. Late Koteshwar Rao, Aged about 36 vears. Occ. Rllifi iii#i"'"l3lt?,,101,,^jJ;,T,";,ffi

¶17

"Yl'fj,f^{*i-rurlils;,*hias;;} Aged about 31 vears. vears. Occ.

¶18

6 T.hirupathi Mounika, Wp. Thirupathi Shankar, Aged about 31 vears. vears. Occ. Nasar,

¶19

[35i?,]ii'?"Xi";,,iJl'd,ln3,1,i"8I; il,?.331'fl;Hlljll]fi,11i;,'ffi*1i

¶20

7 Matoqr tylg.hgnd_er. S/o, Matol?r Aitaiah, Aged aOout 3O yqars,'Occ. Business, R/o. Plot No. 47, Sy. No. 307/4, Mithita Nisar, praqathi Naqir: N.a; Hiii i;; tower, Quthbuttapur Mandat, Medchal-Malkajgiri District.^{- l}

¶21

8 Pallepali .Laxmi Kanth. S/o. p. Krishna, Aged about 36 years, Occ. Self_ qmplgve{ R/o. Ptot No. 12, Sy. No. gozld uitrila Naqarl Fraqaiffi-t{ao;i Near Hill Top Tower, Quthbuilapur Man(al, Medchal-Malk'ajgiri Dis"trici.

¶22

Bandela Shravan Kumar, S/o. Bandela Bhaqyarao, Aqed about 37 vears. Occ. Setf-Emptoyed, R/o.^ptot No. tt, Sy. ruoIeOZ/A, Mithila Naoar. pr;;;th; Nagar, Near Hiil Top Tower, Quthbullapui Mandal, Medchat-Malk5jgiri Disirict.

¶23

'10 V, Shankar, S/o. V. Anjaiah, Aged about 36 Vears, Occ. Self_Emoloved. R/o Plot No 43, Sy. No 307iA, Mithita Naqar,'praqathi Naqar. N,iai'Hiti io; I ower, Quthbullapur Mandal, Medchal-Malkajgiri Djstrict.

¶24

1l Yakkala Raviteia. s/o. .Sam^b-asiva Rao, Aged about 30 years, occ. Business, R/o.^ptot No. 24. Sv No. 307/4, n,li*rA *llliFiagarhi Nagar, Near Hi, Top Tower, euthbuilapur Mandat, tr,r"oCti ji_lu jrr,"rftiri Drstnct

¶25

12.Katru llaga^pavan Kumar, _S/o. Katru Suresh Kumar, Aged about 30 vears. Occ. Bu.siness, R/o. ptot No ja, SV-rrr". bOijn,-ri,r,ti.,"irr=N;;;;,"pdl]ili Nagar, Near Hil rop Tower, euthburriirui Maria-ar, rtr"iiiilr-rr,rifty,igiri'rilyfJll'

¶26

't 3. Yakkala J\4ounika. Wo. yakkala Venu Kumar, Aged about 25 vears. Occ Housewife, R/o.^ptot Ng, .25., Sy l,to eozlA,-nriiniJ r.r;s;i'pr;*thi"ilJII Near Hil Top Tower, euthbutiapirr rrrri"Jit, rvibi"tiai Mrtk;JsiriDtfi;i: ^-r-"

¶27

1. Gaiula Kavitha. W/o Gajula Ralq Rg!rym, Aged about 31 years. Occ. llousgyqg,^{R/o ptot No} is sy-r,ro Joi7n.'rr,iii"ni ^i;;Hiriiil'r;*"I'oltno,ri,pl..^{M;d;i';,i;Uiiir}f,l?J;,,.6?.r#li,t,n",,}

¶28

l5.Chandrq Krran Ushakoela_S/o U Narsing Rao, Aged about 37 vears. Occ Busineqs, R1o.^ptot No. oo. Sv.-ruo-bii7in.'ttir,1 N;;; Hit iil toJi, o"rtnu,trrpur Mandat. ,"0r'i,,,ll?*nj!,.t6?rr,?,,jll^*rn.,

¶29

led^qbout Q?^years, Qcc.

¶30

l-louse1r1ife, Rlo^pror No 6 Sv iv" loin."rriitiii ifftiiii'iil r""ul"i'dl,,no,r,"pur Mandar, ,"o"nr',1,#i*%if,,,.f,ao",ti^*"9,'.,

¶31

lT.Yakkala Mounika, W/o. yakkala Venu Kumar, Aged ebout 2F years, ecc Businesp, Rip.^ptot No 49. Sv ruo. soin'-iijit'nii il6ri'fiiii"il'r#Ji, d"ur,u,rrafur Mandar, ,"o"iulr,llffif!;,.,P,asrthi^ttagr',

¶32

'18 YakkEla Venu Kumar, S/o .yakkala Sambasiva Rao Aged Fbout 35 yq.,.r, Qcc.^I'tpusewife, R/o.^ptot No oo, Si rrtJ-5oz),p Nil"J'il;-";t;[ii'i"r.,l"", olt-o..irr#,,'r,rl.;;i'il"HITl3n,l],?3il,lt14?fj|i

¶33

Mohammed Anwar pasha, S/o. Mohammed Abdul Nabi Aged abo; ;r;;;. Qcc^gqsineqe, Rio.^ptol ruo-. 50, sv"ru;,.5o;/d, Nfi . r |6# iiir illi' rt*", e uthbu uap u r Ma nda r, r, i"Il# i":fl,1?Jll^tJfln?j|i

¶34

.,.PETlTloNFRS

¶35

ANO

¶36

The Slale of Telanoana Rep by its principal Secretary Municipel Adminiqtration and'iJrban obr;dropreni^{-sEiiJlrih"fl"rr,vo};Jo.,nL'}

¶37

2 Greatgr Hyderabad Municioal Qgporation, Rep by its Cgmmissioner, Municipat Cgmptex, Tank Bund no"olifvjera"Eril '-- '

¶38

3 The,gssistant City Town ptann-e-r, Circle No. 25. Division No. .125, e utu[rr llzpu f Gajir ta ram a ra m, lir.]oir,aidr]r, iJ,-g;i'Dl!jii+^--"'

¶39

4 T[re Tpfrsildar, euthbuilapur Mandat, r"O"nr,-r,"*"]n,r, r,"U,a,.

¶40

...EESPONDENTS

¶41

Petition undgr Articre 226 0f the constitution of rndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit tireo itreiewitn, the Hrgn'c,ir.t irv '0" pleased to iqsue a writ of Mandamus, o,. ,ny^"otn", appropriate writ, order declaring the action of the respondents more paiicrtarty tirL ri.+pri."i ri". s and 4 ?re.t.y,!,g tq dispossess the petitioners^'trom ttreri respu"tivL-pLt r.ro."ro, admeasuring !!0 sq yards, ptot No 13, admeasuring 200 Sq 1lrrJs, Floi iv". io, lgTg3srllg^{120 Sq yards,p^tot No 56,7_89,and.t0,"admea.Lit"gjSoO} iq yrrd, ll"lll"^{55, admeasurins} 1gg^{qq yards, ptot No 47, admeasurin!} ibo Sq.i*dq, Plot No, 12, admeasuring 100 Sq yards, ptot No 1.1 , admeasurin"g Zb-Oaii;i;"

¶42

¶43

Plot No.43, admeasuring 200 Sq yards, Plot No.24, admeasuring 150 Sq yards Plot No.^'14, admeasuring 200 Sq yards Plot No. 25, admeasuring 128 Sq yards, Plot No.^'15, admeasuring 200 Sq yards, Plot No 66, admeasuring 200 Sq yards, Plot No.6, admeasuring 500 Sq yards, admeasuring 230 Sq yards, Plot No.50, admeasuring 100 Sq yards in Sy. No.307/A, situated at Mithila Nagar, Pragathi Nagar, Near Hill Top Tower, Quthbullapur Mandal, Medchal-Malkajgiri District without notice and oppo(unity, without following due procedure of law as is illegal, contrary to lavy, in violation of natur4l^justicp pnd in violation of articles 14,21 and 300-A Of the Qonstitution 9f lndia and eonsequently dirgct the Respondents not to dispossess the petitioner without following due prgcess of law, iq the inter€st of justice

¶44

IANO:1OF2 25

¶45

Fetition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in lhe affidgvit liledⁱⁿ Support of the^petition, the High Cou(^may be^pleased to direc! the Respondents ngt to disposgess the petitioners from their respective houses in Sy No 307iA situated at Mithila Nagar, Ptagathi Nqgsr, Near I'lill Top Tower, Quthbullapqr Mandal, tVledchal-Malkajgiri without following^prqcass o( law, pending disposal of the writ petition

¶46

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRl. NASEEM ARA

¶47

9ounsel^{for tbe Respondent No.1: GP FOR MCPLADMN URBAN DEV}

¶48

Counsgl for the Respondent NOs.2&3: SRI K. RAVI MAHENDER Sg FOR Greater HySerabad Municipai Corporation

¶49

Coqnsql for [[e Respondent No.4; GP FOR REVENUE

¶50

The Coqrt 62fle the follqwing: ORDER

¶51

I l

¶52

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P.SAM KOSHY AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NARSING RAO NANDIKONDA

¶53

W.P.No.347l OF 2025

¶54

ORDER,^(pcr Hon blt Sri Jtsrice P.Sam Ko.slry)

¶55

Heard Ms. Naseem Ara, leamed counsel leamed counsel for the petitioner and Mr. K. Ravi Mahendar, leamed Standing Counsel appearing for respondent Nos.2 and 3. Perused the record.

¶56

The instant writ petition has been filed seeking for issuance of Writ of Mandamus against respondent Nos.3 and 4 who are allegedly trying to illegally dispossess the petitioners lrom their respective properties, over which the petitioners have raised a temporary construction for residing.

¶57

Today, during the course of hearing, upon a query being put to the learned counsel for the petitioners as to in what manner, respondent Nos.3 and 4 are trying to interfere with their peaceful possession, she submits that there is a frequent visiting of respondent Nos. j and 4 to the residences of the petitioners alleging that they have illegally encroached upon the govemment land and seeking for vacating the prernises by the petitioners. Except for the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioners that respondent Nos.3 and 4 are orally visiting the petitioners' houses and asking them to vacate their respective premises,

¶58

i.,r

¶59

¶60

there does not seem to be any^proceedings drawn by^any of^the. respondents, much less respondent Nos.3^{and 4.}

¶61

¶62

In the afore given facts and circumstances ofthe^{case, we do not} find any strong cause of action having arisen in^{the case of the} petitioners to approach the writ Court.

¶63

The Writ Petition, accordingly, at this^{juncturestands disposed} of. However, it is made clear^{that in the eventif any of the respondents} intend to^get the^{petitioners vacated, it goes without saying that they} shall be initiating steps, strictly^{in accordance with the provisions of law} governing the held. There shall be^no order^{as to costs.}

¶64

Consequently, tnisccllaneous^{petitions pending, ifany,shall}

¶65

stand closed.

¶66

SD/-MOHD.^ISMAIL P UTY REGIST /,TRUE COPY// SECTION^OFFICER

¶67

To,

¶68

1 The Principal^{Secretary Municipal Administration and Urban Development} Secretariai,^Hyderabad.

¶69

2 The Commissioner,Greater^{Hyderabad Municipal Corporation' Municipal} Complex, Tank^{Bund Road. Hyderabad'}

¶70

rhe Assistant -city.rown^{t1,,;,",frd3[::#":,i3;nflfi!",1"t"iu'} QutubullaPur^{Gajularamarar}

¶71

4 TheTahsildar,QuthbullapurMandal,Medchal-MalakajgiriDistrict.

¶72

One CC to^{SRI NASEEM ARA Advocate[OPUC]}

¶73

¶74

6 One CC to SRI^{K. RAVI MAHENDER SC FORGreater Hyderqbad Municipal} Corporation [OPUC]

¶75

7 TwoCCsto GP^{FOR MCPLADMNURBANDEV ,High Court for the State of} Telangana. [OUT]

¶76

Two CCs to^{GPfor Revenue,High Court for the State of Telangana at} Hyderabad. [OUT]

¶77

o Two CD CoPies KKS q,4/ BS

HIGH COURT

DATED:2310412025

ORDER

1HE SrA ,€
(o l)a
q .S
aJ-:) )'
,J 0s tllAY il6 L
*

¶82

WP.No.3471 of 2025

¶83

DISPOSING THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS

¶84

Jhansi Laxmi v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Jhansi Laxmi v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, Hyd Vs M/S. Sushee Infra Pvt. Ltd, Hyd

Commissioner of Income Tax-Iii, Hyd Vs M/S. Sujana Metals Ltd, Hyd

Prl Commr of Income Tax [Tds] Hyderabad Vs M/S Hcc-Meil-Ncc-Wpil [Jv] Hyderabad

M/s Rvr Constructions Vs Income Tax Officer

The Primary Agriculture Co-Oparative Society Limited Bejjanki Vs Assessment Unit

Thikka Reddy Palakurthi Vs Dc/Acit Circle - 5(1)