Dismissed

Smt.K.Udayasree, Chennai and 2 Others v. Secy, Rev Dept, Telangana State, Hyd and 3 Others

Telangana HC23 Apr 2025WP/34369/2014

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Telangana High Court dismissed Writ Petition No. 34369 of 2014 filed by Smt. K.Udayasree others seeking quashing of a gazette notification. The petition was dismissed for non-prosecution as no representative appeared on behalf of the petitioners on the hearing date.

What did the court decide?

The writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. No order as to costs.

Smt.K.Udayasree, Chennai and 2 Others Vs Secy, Rev Dept… — Land Acquisition | Telangana HC (2025)

¶1

[^32s5 ]

¶2

HIGH COURT^{FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANAAT HYDERABAD} (SPecial Original Jurisdiction)

¶3

WEDNESDAY, THE^{TWENTY THIRDDAY OF APRIL} TWO THOUSAND^{AND TWENTY FIVE}

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HONOURABLE^{SRI JUSTICEN.V.SHRhVAN KUMAR}

¶6

WRIT PETITIO NNO^{: 34369 OF 2014}

¶7

Between:

¶8

Smt. K.Udayasree,^{W/o.K.Nagendra Babu, aoed 46 vears' Occup House} Wife, No.^1, oeu^{nprrtr"enid,xii'rtJr'"t" Roao' iniruvarimuyurChennai'}

¶9

Smt.S.V.Sangeetha^{w/o S.V tr/urali Manohar' aged 49 years' OccupHouse} - wiid, ny" H.t{o.15/1 ,28th Besanth NagerChennai' 3. Sri. P.Saibaba^{Sio late P Rangaiah'agsq.49 years OccupBusiness'} " il. r.ro. zi-ai, riail',ro r,S"upiuut'lat-io*e|.s,^"R r' Na gar' Saf ilguda' Hyderabad47.

¶10

(ThePetitionersNo.l&2arerepresentedbytheirGPAthePetitionerNo-3 herein)

¶11

...PETITIONERS

¶12

AND

¶13

1 The State of^{Telangana,rePt.,} by its Secretary,^{RevenueDepartment,} Secretariat,^HYderabad.

¶14

A.P. State^{Wakf Board,reP} by its Chief Executive^{Officer, Haz House,} NamPallY, HYderabad.

¶15

The District^{Collector, Ranga Reddy District, Lakdikapool' at Hyderabad}

¶16

The Tahasildar,^{N4alkajgiri N/andal, RRDistrict'}

¶17

,..RESPONDENTS

¶18

PetitionunderArticle226oftheConstitutionoflndiaprayingthatinthe circumstances^{statedin the affidavit filed therewith' the HiEh Court maybe} pleased to issue an^{appropriate Writ, Orderor Direction more particularlyonein} thenatureofwritofCERTloRARlandcallforrecordspertainingtotheGazette notification^{publishedin S1.No.2893in Supplementto Part-llNo 6A dated} 09.02.19B9inrespectofthelandsinSy.No.546to549;551and573situatedat lr/alkajgiri village^{and Mandal, Ranga Reddy district'and quash the same as} illegal and arbitrary^{and violativeof the principles of natural iustice'}

¶19

¶20

Counsel for the petitioner: SRI J.SURESH BABU (Nor pREsENr) Counsel for the Respondent No.1, 3 & 4: Gp FOR REVENUE

¶21

Counsel for the Respondent No.2: SRI FARHAN AZAM KHAN, SC FOR WAQF BOARD

¶22

The Court made the following: ORDER

¶23

l I I

¶24

: t

¶25

THE IION'BLE SRI^{.IUSTICE N.V.SHRAVANKUMAR}

¶26

lVrit Petition No. 34369 of^2OL4

¶27

ORDER:

¶28

On 19.O9.2014, this Court observed^thatthe petitioners have not produced^{the authenticatedcopy of} tlre gazelte notification and^{grantedtime' Today when the} matter was taken up for^{hearing, none has appeared on} behalf of petitioners either^{physicallyor by virtual mode'} Hence, this Court^{is left with no other option except to} dismiss the writ^{petition for non-prosecution.}

¶29

Accordingly, this writ^{petition is dismissedfor non} prosecution. There shall^{be no order as to costs}

¶30

Asa sequel, miscellaneous applications,^ifany

¶31

pending, sha-Il stand^closed.

¶32

¶33

D/. B. REKHA^RANI ANT REGISTRA //TRUE COPY// CTION OFFICER

¶34

To,

¶35

One CC to^{SRIJ.SURESHBABUAdvocate[OPUC]}

¶36

One CC^{to SRI FARHAN AZAtvlKHAN, SC FORWAQF BOARD [OPUC]}

¶37

3.TwoCCstoGPFoRREVENUE,HighCourtfortheStateofTelanganaat Hyder-abad [OUT]

¶38

Two CD CoPies BSR G GJP

,,, .-- .-*-&-€

; I

i I I i ;

HIGH COURT

DATED:2310412025

ORDER

:;.r:,S:-
C
'i .. c,,:
i<br>)L) 04 [tT 2975 :.i
.t- .,'

¶47

WP.No.34369 of 2014

¶48

DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION

¶49

FOR NON.PROSECUTION,

¶50

WITHOUT COSTS

Smt.K.Udayasree, Chennai and 2 Others v. Secy, Rev Dept, Telangana State, Hyd and 3 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Smt.K.Udayasree, Chennai and 2 Others v. Secy, Rev Dept, Telangana State, Hyd and 3 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

The Korlagudem P.A.C.S Vs The Chief Executive Officer

Jawaji Kamalamma , Babamma Vs Government of Telangana

Ambareesh Jonnavittula Vs The Union of India

Radha Krishna Narne Vs Union of India

Jasti Anasuya, Vs State of A.P.

Nermati Ravinder Reddy Vs Union of India