Paravathi Anitha, v. The State of Telangana

What is this about?

Single-judge bench: N.V. Shravan Kumar J. Parties: Paravathi Anitha (petitioner) v. (1) State of Telangana, Dept of Revenue-Land Acquisition; (2) District Collector, Yadadri-Bhongir District; (3) Additional Collector and Competent Authority cum LAO for Regional Ring Road (RRR), Yadadri-Bhuvanagiri Division; (4) Revenue Divisional Officer, Bhuvanagiri Mandal; (5) Tahsildar, Thurkapally; (6) Madha Balnarsaiah; (7) Madha Kiran. Advocates: M/S OM LAW FIRM (petitioner); GP FOR LAND ACQUISITION (respondents 1-5); Sri Pavan Kumar Y.V. (respondent 6); none listed for respondent 7. Subject matter: Regional Ring Road (RRR) land acquisition — notifications dated 18.04.2023 (approx. 1.4467310 hectares in Sy.No.168 and approx. 0.8649900 hectares in Sy.No.169) and 06.05.2024 (approx. 0.177061 hectares in Sy.No.169) at Ibrahimpur Village, Thurkapally Mandal, Yadadri-Bhuvanagiri District; petitioner alleged illegal mutation by respondents 6 and 7 of agricultural lands belonging equally to her and respondent 6 as shares of the deceased parents, and sought mandamus to consider her representations, halt compensation disbursement pending enquiry, and a declaration of arbitrariness under Articles 14, 21 and 300-A. Outcome: withdrawal permitted at petitioner's request; writ petition dismissed as withdrawn without costs; miscellaneous petitions closed. Statutes referenced: Article 226, Articles 14, 21 and 300-A (Constitution of India); Section 151 CPC. No precedent cases cited; no merits adjudicated — cite only for the procedural fact of voluntary withdrawal, not for any substantive proposition. Note: several dates and strings are OCR-garbled in the source (including the representation dates and the withdrawal-letter date) and are deliberately not asserted.