Writ petition challenging suspension of a KGBV Special Officer and an associated contempt case over non-compliance with interim court orders. Government Pleader confirmed compliance with the interim orders; the writ petition was closed with no costs, and the contempt case was also closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[33041
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
MONDAY, THE TWENTY NINTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NAMAVARAPU RAJESHWAR RAO
WRIT PETITON NO: 3345 OF 2017 AND CONTEMPT CASE NO: 980 OF 2017
CONTEMPT CASE NO:980 OF 2017 :
Contempt Case filed Under Sections 1O to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 to punish the respondent for his wilful and deliberate violating the Orders of the High Court dated 01-02-201 7 passed in WPMP No.3977 of 2017 in WP No.3345 ot 2017.
Between :
P.Divya, D/o.Rajendra Kumar, Aged about 28 years, Special Officer, Kasturiba Gandhi Balika Vidyalaya, Tandur Village and Mandal, Mancherial District (formerly Adilabad Dist.) Rl/o.Tandur Village and Mandal, Mancherial District.
...Petitioner
AND
Mancherial District, Telangana State.
...Respondents
WRIT PETITION No: 3345OF 2017
Between:
P.Diwa. D/o.Raiendra Kumar, Agedabout 28 years, Special Officer,Kasturiba Gandhi Ba ika'Vidyalaya, TandurVillage and Mandal,Mancherial .District tiormeiyni itaOad Dist.)'R/o. TandurVillag-eand Mandal, Mancherial District
...Petitioner
AND
...Respondents
Petition under Article226 olthe constitution of lndia prayingthat in the circumstances stated in theaffidavit filed therewith, the High court may be pleased to issrle an appropriate writ, order ordirection more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamusdeclaringthe action of the respondents in not allowing thepetitioner lo dischargeduties as Special officer,KGBV School,Tandur (Village and Mandal) lvlancherialDistrictin the guise of impugned proceedings isstledby the 2nd respondent inProc.Rc.No.1018/SSA/T9/KGBV/2016dated 5-10-20'16 directing thepetitioner beplaced under suspension and the consequential proceed-ings c,fl the 3rd/4th respondent dated 6-10-20'16as being arbitrary,illegal, unjust, without authority oflaw motivatedand in violation of Article 14 of the Constitution of lndia and tohold that the petitioneris entitledto discharge duties as special officer, KGBVSchool, Tandur Villageand Mandal, Mancherial District with all const>quential benefitsincluding salarydue to petitionerfromOctober, 2016.
l.A. NO: 1 OF 2017(WVMP.NO: ?379 OF 20171
Between :
AND
...Petitioners in WP 3345 ot 2017 on the file of High Court
....Respondents No.2 & 3 is Formal Party
Petition under Section 151 of CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may bepleased Vacate the interim order dated, 01.02-2017.W.P.M.P No. 397712017,W. P. No. 334512017 in the interest ofjustice.
1A NO: 1 OF 2023
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court maype pleased to stay all further proceddingspusuant to the revised Show Cause Notice in Rc No.101B/T9/SSA/KGBY/2016 dated 2510512017 issued by the 2nd respondent herein pending disposal of the above writ petition.
Counsel for the Petitioner in WP & CC : Sri D.Linga Rao
Counsel for the Respondents in WP & CC : GP FOR SERVICES I
: COMMON ORDER The Court made the following
IN THEHIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
AT HYDERABAD
THE HON'BLESRI JUSTICE NAMAVARAPU RAJESHWARRAO
w P
3 2 7
AND CONTEMPTCASE No.98O OF 2017
DATE OF ORDER:29.12'2025
Between:
P.Divya
...Petitioner
AND
The Stateof I'elangana rep'bY its PrincipleSecretaryto Government, SchoolEducal:ionDePartment, Secretariat,TS, Hyderabad and others'
...Respondents
coMMONORDER
-t
This VvritPetition is filed seeking to declare the action of the respondentsin not allowingthe petitioner to dischargeduties as Special Officer,KGB',/School,Tandur (Villageand Mandal)'Mancherial District'in theguise ofthe impugnedproceedingsissued by the 2nd respondentin Proc.Rc.No.lO1B/SSA/T9IKGBv/2Ot6,dated 05'10'2016' placing the petitioner undersuspension, and the consequential proceedings issued by the3'd4thrt:spondentsdated06'10'2016,asillegalandarbitrary'
4- In view of the above submissions, the Writ petition is closed. There shall be no order as to costs.
In view of the closure of W.P.No.3345 of 20!7, no further orders are required to be passed in this contempt case, and accordingly, the Contempt Case is closed.
Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shail stand closed.
SD/. N. SRIHARI DEPUW REGISTRAR
//TRUE COPYII
SECTION OFFTCER
To, 1. One CC to SRI D.Linga Rao, Advocate [OpUC]
I
SVS/PSL %
t ls! .|',..;-M
I I I I
Ii
HIGH COI.JRT
DATED i2$ll12l2025
ir\
COMMON ORDER WRIT PET'ITON N o : 3345 OF 2017, AND CONTEMPT CASE NO: 980 OF2017
1
:t S
06 ttB 426 n
()
'-
*
CLOSING THE CONTEMPT CASE & WRIT PETITION
o
6
2 issues framed by the court
Was the suspension of the petitioner as Special Officer, KGBV Tandur arbitrary and illegal?
Had respondents complied with the interim orders dated 01.02.2017, requiring further orders in the writ or contempt case?
2 provisions across 2 enactments
P.Divya
The State of Telangana, rep. by its Principle Secretary to Government, School Education Department
The Commissioner of School Education and State Project Director, Sarva Shiksha Abhiyan, Telangana
The Project Officer, Telengana Sarva Shiksha Abhiyan, Adilabad District
The Project Officer, Telengana Sarva Shiksha Abhiyan, Mancherial District
Namavarapu Rajeshwar Rao
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
