Smt.S.Uma v. The State of Telangana
Case brief
What is this about?
A writ petition alleging issuance of a fake pattadar passbook based on a fake 1978 sale deed was withdrawn at the petitioner's request and dismissed without costs.
A writ petition alleging issuance of a fake pattadar passbook based on a fake 1978 sale deed was withdrawn at the petitioner's request and dismissed without costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[32ss l
IN THE HIGHCOURT FOR THE STATE OF TE.LANGANAAT HYDERABAD tSPeciafbiiginaIJurisdiction)
MONDAY,THE THIRD DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSANDAND TWENTY FIVE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLESRI JUSTICEE'V' VENUGOPAL
WRIT PETITIONNO:33141 0F2025
Between:
Housewife
ill8,Vr,,'.IJr.!?)iI#3"[:i[:"&AYxiiHJl',T,J3'?Boo
...PETITIONER
AND
"RESP.NDENTS
PetitionunderArticle226oftheConstitutionoflndiaprayingthatinthe circumstancesStatedintheaffidavitfiledttrerewith,theHighCourtmaybe pleased toissue an appropriateWrit' Orderor Direclion' more particularly one in the natureof writ of Mandamus,decraringthe ac{ion of the Respondents 2 to 6 rn failingtoconsrdertherepresentationofthepetitionerdl.24.og.2o2Sforinitiating actionagainstthe 7th respondent for obtaining fake pattapassbook No.
.......-.#
T05230250169and KhataNo 60284in Sy No 44l2tA lo an extent of Ac'1'08 guntas, in Sy.No. 44t2tEloanextentof Ac 1 04 guntasand in Sy No 44l2AAlo an extentof Ac.108 guntas total to an extent of Ac 3 20 guntas' situatedat situatedat GandigudaVillage' ShamshabadMandal' Ranga Reddy Districton fake Saledeed DocumentNo3075 of 1978 dt03081978 and issuing Pattadar passbookwithout issuingNotrce to the petitioner in ProceedingNo 8/2857/2019 dated13.06.2020 continuethe same in the DharaniPortal as illegal' arbitrary' unconstitutionaland violationof NaturalJustice and without jurisdiction and violationof Article14' 21 ,and 300-A of constitution of lndia and contrary to the provisions ofNew Revenue act RORAct 2025 (ActNo 1 ot 2025) consequently direct therespondents2 to 6 to conduct enquiry against the 7th respondentfor obtainingthe above statedfake pattadar pass book on fake Sale deed Document No.3075 of1g78dt.03.08.1g78by dury consideringthe representationof the petitioner dated:24.09 2025'
IA NO: 10F 2025
petition under Section 151cpc prayingthat in the circumstances stated in the affidavitfiled in supportof the petrtion, the High courtmay be pleasedto direct therespondent Nos 2 to 6 to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 24.09.2025pending disposalof the above wrrt petition'
Counselfor the Petitioner: SRI K' KIRAN KUMAR
Counsel fortheRespondents:GP FOR REVENUE
The Courtmade the following:ORDER
:..1: .,|
THE HOITOTIRABLE SRI WSTICE E.V.VEIiIUGOPAL
WRIT PETITION No.33 l4l of2O25
ORDER:
Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this writ petition.
Permission as sought for is accorded.
Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as
withdrawn. No costs.
Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand
dismissed.
SD/-AHMED ABDULLAH KHAN ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
//TRUE COPY//
SECTION OFFICER
To
MP
BS
HIGHCOURT
DATED:0311112025
o:<br>()c z.
5 t11 2026
xC)
t *
0
SPATC
ORDER
WP.No.33141ot 2025
DISMISSINGTHE WRIT PETITION AS WITHDRAWN WITHOUTCOSTS
\ao
A I
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Petitioner (housewife, name illegible in text)
The State of Telangana, Rep by its Principal Secretary Revenue Department
The Chief Commissioner, Land Administration, Govt of Telangana
The District Collector, Ranga Reddy District
The Revenue Divisional Officer, Rajendranagar Revenue Division, Ranga Reddy District
The Tahsildar, Shamshabad Mandal, Ranga Reddy District
E.V. Venugopal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court