Dismissed¶29

Ali Azgar v. The State of Telangana

Telangana HC16 Apr 2025WP/32382/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Telangana HC (T. Vinod Kumar J., 16-04-2025) dismisses as infructuous W.P. 32382/2024, which sought mandamus against SHO Amberpet PS for non-registration of FIR on complaint dated 10-09-2024 and directions to arrest accused and investigate; dismissed on petitioner's own submission that cause no longer survives; no costs; pending miscellaneous petitions (I.A. 1/2024 under S.151 CPC) closed.

What did the court decide?

Upon learned counsel for the petitioner submitting that the cause in the writ petition did not survive for consideration and that the petition had become infructuous, the Court recorded that submission and dismissed the writ petition as infructuous, with no order as to costs. ¶29

Ali Azgar Vs The State of Telangana — Writ and Judicial Review | Telangana HC (2025)

¶1

[³¹⁶⁶ I

¶2

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶3

WEDNESDAY, THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.VINOD KUMAR

¶6

WRIT PETITION'NO: 323820F 2024

¶7

Between:

¶8

\li-Azggr. -S/o:^{Anwar Mahammod,Aged about44 yearc,} Occ: Business, Office at 2-3-361118, Road No.6, Amberfet, Hyderabad.-

¶9

...PETITIONER

¶10

AND

¶11

1 The State.of Telangana, Home Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad, Rep. by its Principle Secretary.

¶12

2 The Commissioner Of Police, Hyderabad Commissionerate, Basheerbagh, Hyderabad.

¶13

The Station House Officer, Amberpet police Station, Hyderabad.

¶14

...RESPONDENTS

¶15

Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High court may be pleased to issue a writ or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the respondent No.3 in not registering the FIR in pursuant to the complaint of the petitioner dated 10-09-2024 against the accused though the cognizable offence committed as illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional, violative of Principles of natural justice and contrary to the judgment of the llon'ble Supreme court and consequenfly direct the Respondents to register the FIR duly effecting the arrest of the accused and conduct investigation by following due procedure of law.

¶16

¶17

lA NO: 1 OF 2024

¶18

petition unlsl lir clion 151 CPC^praying that^{in the circums;tarcesst6iedin} the affidavit filed in^su P ,ort of the petition, the High Court may br-' cleased^{to direct} the respondents^forth',tri h to register the FIR against^{the accusedne ntioned in the} complaint of the Pr:1it Petition.

¶19

Counsel for the^{Petitio rer: SRI NIMMALA SHESHIDHAR}

¶20

Counsel for the^{ResFroldents: GP FOR HOME}

¶21

The Court made the^{lrorlowing:ORDER}

¶22

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE T. VINOD KUMAR

¶23

WRIT P ON No.3238 ot 2024

¶24

ORDER: