Shaik Naser Vs The State of Telangana — Writ and Judicial Review | Telangana HC (2025)

Shaik Naser Vs The State of Telangana — Writ and Judicial Review | Telangana HC (2025)

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

Permission to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to avail appropriate remedy as available under law, including liberty sought to implead the concerned Sub-Registrar as party respondent in O.S.No.48M of 2024 (VII Junior Civil Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad); dismissed as withdrawn, miscellaneous petitions if any closed, no costs.

Issue for consideration

Whether the action of Respondent No.2 (Sub-Registrar, Golconda) in not considering the petitioner's complaint/representations dated 07-12-2024 and 22-01-2025 is illegal, irregular and irrational, warranting issuance of a writ of mandamus.

Ratio / Principle

Learned counsel for the petitioner, after arguing the matter at length, sought permission to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to implead the concerned Sub-Registrar as party respondent in O.S.No.48M of 2024; the Court accorded permission to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to avail appropriate remedy as available under law.

Key takeaways

The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn; miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in the writ petition shall stand closed; no costs.ratio¶28

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad (N.V. Shravan Kumar, J.), Writ Petition No. 3189 of 2025, decided 05-02-2025: The petitioner sought a writ of mandamus declaring the action of the Sub-Registrar, Golconda (Respondent No.2) in not considering his complaint/representations dated 07-12-2024 and 22-01-2025 as illegal, irregular and irrational, and had filed IA No.1 of 2025 under Section 151 CPC for an interim direction to consider those representations. After arguing the matter at length, counsel sought permission to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to implead the concerned Sub-Registrar as party respondent in O.S.No.48M of 2024 pending before the VII Junior Civil Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad. The Court accorded permission to withdraw with liberty to avail appropriate remedy as available under law, dismissed the writ petition as withdrawn, directed that miscellaneous petitions, if any, stand closed, and made no order as to costs. No ruling was rendered on the merits of the grievance against the Sub-Registrar.

[^32s5 I

HiGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)

WEDNESDAY,THE FIFTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENry FIVE

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.V.SHRAVAN KUMAR

WRIT PETITION NO: 3'189 OF 2025

Between:

Shaik Naser, S/o. Late Shaik Mahboob, Age about- 50 years, ooc- Private employee, Fyo. 9-8-95, Kumar Wadi, Golconda, Hyderabad, T5-500008

...PETITIONER

AND

The State of Telangana, Represented by its Principal Secretary Revenue Department, Hyderabad, T.S.

The Sub-Registrar, Golconda, Hyderabad (South), TS.

Shaik Rasheed, S/o. Late Shaik Mahboob, Age about- 65 years, Occ- Private eryployee, Fl/ o. 9-8-109/5/54, Saleh Nagar, Kancha, Chota Bazar, Golconda, Hyderabad, T5-500008.

Ayesha Begum,Wlo. Mirza lbrahim Baig, Age about- 60 years, Occ- House hold, F/o. 9-2-59, Langer House, Hyderabad, TS.

Sohail Bin Habeeb Chaush, S/o. Habeeb CHaush, Age about- 28 years, OccPrivate, Rl,/ o. CHota Bazar, Saleh Nagar, Kacha, Golconda, Hydeiabad, TS500008.

...RESPONDENTS

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may b pleased to issue a Writ or Order or Directron, particularly one in nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the Respondent no.2, in not coflsidering Petitioners complainUrepresentation dated 7-12-2024 and 22-1-2025 as iflegal, irregular, irrational

lA NO: 1 OF 2025

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 2 Respondent to consider the representation dated, Cray-12-2O24, 2210112025, pending disposal of the main Writ Petition

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRl. AASHIR^{MEHTAB KHAN}

Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1&2: GP^{FOR STAMPSAND REGISTRATION} Counsel for the Respondent nOs.3 to 5: --

The Court made the following: ORDER

HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.V.SHRAVAN KUMAR

WRITPETITIO N No.3189 of 2025

ORDER:

After arguing matter at length, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the writ petition with a liberty to implead the concemed Sub Registrar as party respondent in O.S.No.48M of 2024 pending on the file of VII Junior Civil Judge, Ciry Civil Cour! Hyderabad.

In view of the same, permission is accorded to withdraw the writ petition with a liberty to avail appropriate remedy as available under law

Accordingly, the writ petition is tlismissed as withdrawn. Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending irr this rvrit petition shall stand

closed. No costs

SD/.MOHD. ISMAIL ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY//

SECTION OFFICER

To,

One CC to SRl. AASHIR MEHTAB KHAN Ad te [OPUCI

2 Two CCs to GP FOR STAMPS AND REGISTRATION ,High Court for the State of Telangana. [OUT]

3 Two CD Copies KKS cJPrpt.-

HIGH COURT

DATED:0510212025

ORDER

i , \
()o ;l!
2 7 JUI{ 2U5
(

i:/rTCH EO

WP.No.3189 of 2025

DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS WITHDRAWN WITHOUT COSTS

6^ot(a x,*