Janaba Shahmeen Ghaziuddin Khan Vs The State of Telangana

Janaba Shahmeen Ghaziuddin Khan, Wo: Nawab Mohammed Ghaziuddin Khan, Age about. 82 years, Occ. Household, R/o. H.No.8-2-6861D19t1, Zarinazarr, Road No.12, Banjara Hills, Hyderabad, Telangana.

¶10

Janaba Shahmeen Khan, Wo: Nawab Mohammed Ghaziuddin Khan, Age about. 60 years, Occ. Household, Rio. H.No.B-2-6861D!911, Zarinazan, RoAd No.12, Banjara hills, Hyderab?{, Telangana

¶11

D/o: Nawab Mohammed Ghaziuddin Khan, Age about. 60 years, Occ, Household, R/q. H.No.8-2-686/D/9/1. Zarinazarr,- Road No. 12 Banjara hills, Hyderabad,^Telangana.

¶12

..,PETITIONERS

¶13

AND

¶14

1 The State of Telangana, Rept. by its Prl Sect., Revenue Department, Secretariat Buildin$, Hyderabad.

¶15

2 The District Collector, Shamshbabad Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, Telangana.

¶16

J T[e Joint Collector, Shamshbabad Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, Telangana 4 The Revenue Divisional Officer, Shamshbabad Mandal, Ranga Reddy DIstrict, Telangana.

¶17

5 The Tahsildar, Syedguda Village, Shamshbabad Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, Telangana.

¶18

...RESPONDENTS

¶19

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, more particularly one in the nature of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ declaring the action of the respondent No. 2 to 5 herein in not considering petitioners representation dated 05/09/2024 seeking to petitioners implementation of Revenue pahani entries online with respect to agricultural land

¶20

-1.i.i

¶21

in Sy. No. 1 to 26 , total extent of 750 Bigahs equivalent to Acers 503.00 Guntas situated at Syedguda Village, Shamshabad Mandal, Rangareddy District Telangana State as highly illegal, arbitrary, violative of Article 14 and 21 of The Constitution of lndian, in consequence direct the respondents to immediately mutate the name of petitioner against above mentioned lands and issue patta passbook and title deed.

¶22

lA NO:^'f OF 2025

¶23

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents No 2 to 5 herein reslraining them not to entrain or create any third party ieterest by implementing of flg.v-gnuq pahani entries online With respect to land in $y Nq. 1 !o 26, total extgnt 9f 750 Bigahs equivalent to Acers 503.00 Guntas situated at SyedgUda Village, Shamshabad Mandal, ftangareddy District Telangana Slate pelding adjudicatiqn the main Writ petitign.

¶24

Coqnsel for the Petitiongls:^gBl MOHD IFTEEAR ALI

¶25

Counsel for the Rqspondgnts: GP FOR REVENUE

¶26

The Court made the following: OBDER

¶27

/3

¶28

HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. BIIASKAR REDDY .

¶29

UIRIT PETITION No.2977 of 2o25

¶30

ORDER

¶31

This Writ Petition is hled praying this Court to declare the action of respondent Nos.2 to S in not considering the petitioners' representation, dated 05.O9 .2024 seeking to implement the entries of pahanies in the online in respect of the land to an extent of 75O Bigahs equivalent to Acs.503.OO guntas in Sy.Nos. I to 26, situated at Syedguda Village, Shamshabad Mandal, Rangareddy District, as illegal, arbitrary and violative of Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently prayed for other appropriate reliefs.

¶32

It is stated that the husband of the petitioner No. 1 by name Nawab Mohammed Ghaziuddin Khan has acquired the rights over the land to an extent of 750 Bigahs equivalent to Acs.503.0O guntas in Sy.Nos. 1 to 26, situated at Syedguda Village, Shamshabad Mandal, Rangareddy District by virtue of the Munsif Court Decree, dated 04.1 1.1954 in Case No.4 of 1949 and the order of Nizam Atiyat, dated 17.03.196O in File No. 11/56. It is further stated that the husband of petitioner No. 1 executed a Hibanama, dated 27.01.2022 in favour of the petitioners. Therefore, the petitioners have submitted a representation, dated 05.O9.2024 before the respondent

¶33

2

¶34

I .t'II rrl

¶35

CVBR, J \Yp_2977 2025

¶36

authorities seeking mutation and consequential issuance of e-pattadar passbooks in their favour. The grievance of the petitioners is that even after receiving the said representation, the respondent authorities are not considering the same.

¶37

Considered the submissions of the learned counsel for the rcspective parties and with their consent, this writ petition is being disposed of at the admission stage.

¶38

Sri L.Ravinder, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue appearing for the respondents has submitted that except stating that the husband of petitioner No. t has acquired the rights over the subject land through a^judgment and decree in Case No.4 17949, dated 04.11.1954 and the order of Nizam Atiyat in File No.11/56, dated 17.03.1960, the petitioners have not hled any documents in support of their claim.

¶39

A perusal of the contents of the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition would show that the petitioners, relying upon the^judgment and decree in Case No.4/1949, dated 04.11.1954 and the order of Nizam Atiyat in File No.11/56, dated 17 .03.1960, which equally amounts to a decree of the civil Court, are now seeking implementation of the same after a period of 65 years from the date of granting the decree. Since the husband of petitioner No. 1 or the petitioners have not taken

CVBR, J Wp 2971 2025

I I

)
/\y

any steps at the earliest point of time as per the^prrivisions of the Telangana Land Revenue Regulations or Telangana^Land Revcnue Act 1317 Fasli or Telangana Rrghts in Land and Pattadar Passbooks Act, 197 1 and the Rules made thereundcr or Telangana Rights in Land and Pattadar Passbooks AcL,2O2O, for recording their names in the revenue records and therefore, at this length of time the revenue authorities are not^conferred with the power either for mutation or for grant of succession and consequential issuance of pattadar passbooks under the provisions ol the aforesai.d enactments. Hencc, thc writ petilion is misconceived and liable to be dismissed rvith costs.

¶44

Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed wi[h costs of Rs.5,O00i - payable to the credit of Account No.62423627372 (Library) of the Telangana Higtr Court Advocates' Association, Hyderabad, within a period of two u,eeks from the date of receipl of a copy of this order and proof of payment thereof shall be Illed before the Registry.

¶45

As a sequel, the miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed.

MEMORANDUM OF COSTS

w.P.NO.2977 0F 2025

Rs. Ps

Costs Quantified by Hon'ble Court (That the Petitioners herein are directed to pay costs of Rs.5,000/- (Rupees Five Thousand

I1

\

!

,r

Only) to the Account No 62423627372(Library), of the Telangana Hrgh Court Advocates' Association, Hyderabad. High Court for the State of Telangana, Hyderabad.

10,000-00

TOTAL

10,000-00

SD/.L. LAKSHMI BABU ASSISTANT REGISTRAR <-r\ //TRUE COPY// r I . : J "SECTIoNoFFICER To, 'J

¶59