'toissue an appropriate writ,order, ordirection, more particularly one in the aature of writ of mandamus, in declaring the actioa of the respondents in issuing the G.O.Rt.No.259, dated L3.LL,2OL4 aad other consequeutial proceedings Rc.No.28lAdmn V-2|2OLL dated 15.11.2O14 aud also the ptoceedings of the commissioner of Collegiate Education, Telangaa.a State, Hyderabad through proceediugs Rc.No.28lAdmn Y -2 / 2Olt dated O7.O8.2O15, ard Memo No.7ia4lcEl A2l2Ol2 ilateil O7.O8.2O15 issued by the Government of Telangaaa, Higher Educatioa Department and in regularizing tb.e service of the petitiorer from the date of disposd of the UIP No.33585.of 2OLO dated 25.04.2012 "i illegal, arbitrary, and unconstitutional i.e., violatiou of Article 14 and 39ldl of Corstitution of India and consequeatly direct the respo[dents to notionally segularize the services of the petitioler retrospectively w.e.f. 01.11.1993 in the 46 respondeat college by counting the serrice of the petitlouer from the date of initial appoiatnent of petitioner as contiauit5r of serice, for pensionary benelits and monetary berefits from O1.O1.2O1O along with difference of arrears of pay tiJl 24.o,4.2012 to the petitioner by re-fixing the payscale of the petitioner in the light of the judgment reported in (2O15f Supreme Court Cases 265 i.e., Amarkant Rai v. State of Bihar aad others in Civil Appeal No.2835 of 2015 dated 13.O3.2O15."