Vadthya Hamu Naik v. Union of India
Case brief
What is this about?
The petitioner challenged HPCL's inaction regarding alleged tender irregularities. The respondent produced a letter responding to the petitioner's representation, which the petitioner did not challenge. The Court held nothing survived for adjudication and closed the petition.
What the court decided
I
[3300 I
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY, THE TWENry EIGHTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENW FIVE
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE NAGESH BHEEMAPAKA
WRIT PETITION NO: 29471 oF 2025
Between:
Yl9tl,.V,Hamu Naik,.Slo Somla Vadthya, Aged about 48 years, Occ. ContractorR:/o Plot No. 571, Nandi Hills Road No.9 Meerpet, R.R.District.-
...PETITIONER
AND
- Union of lndia, Rep by its Secretary, Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas, Janpath Road, New Delhi.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the inaction of respondents in conducting an enquiry into alleged irregularities in a tender constitutes an actionable grievance after a response was issued?
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Y. Hamu Naik
- respondent
Union of India
- respondent
Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited
- respondent
The General Manager (Procurement), Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited
- respondent
The Deputy General Manager, Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Telangana HC
- Decided on
- · October
- Registered
- Case no.
- WP/29471/2025
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court