Mr. Mirza Feroz Shamim Baig Vs The State of Telangana and 11 others

Sri Kovela Ranganayaka^{SwamyTemple, Tirupallig-adda,Salarjung Colony,} Nalanagar, GudTdimdlkapur,^{Asifhagar, Hyderabad Rep by its Executive} Officer.

¶18

The Principal Secretary,^{Registration Department,Telangana, Hyderabad}

¶19

The Commissioner,^{and lnspectorGeneral, Registrationand Stamps} Department. Telangana^{State, Hyderabad.}

¶20

The District Registrar,^{Ranga Reddy District.}

¶21

The Sub- Registrar,^{Hyderabad (South).}

¶22

11.The Chairman, of the^{Committee and The Chief Commissionerof Land} Administration (CCLA) Survey,^{Settlementand Land Record (SS and Lf} )' Government of'Telaniana,^{Hyderabad.Abids, Hyderabad,Telangana State'}

¶23

The District Collector, Hyderabad^{District, Hyderabad}

¶24

...Respondents

¶25

petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances^{stated in the affidavitfiled therewith, the HighCourt} may be oleased^{to issue a Writ, Order or Direction, more particularlyone in} the nature of Writ of^{Mandamus,to declare the impugnedEviction Not,cedated 0111112021} (received by the^{petitioneron 0211112021)issued} by the tlespondent No.6 as illeoal,^{arbitrary and against the provisionsof Telanganarlharitable} and Hindu Reiigious^{lnstrtutionsand EndowmentsAct, 1987 and againstall settled principles} of law^{and set-asrde the same and consequentlyto direct the respondents} to remove^{the subject property H.No.9-4-86/81/7, NanalNagarSalarajung} Colony, Hvderabad^{from the list of prohibitory properties as it dc,es} not correlate io Sv.No.ZAS^{and 286 Guddimalkapur,Asifnagar,Hyderabadbut falls} within the purviewof Sy.No.141,142and^{143 of ShaikpetVillage,} Hyderabad.

¶26

IAN^{O:1OF 2021}

¶27

petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit^{filed in supportof the petition, the High Couri may} be^pleased to suspend^{the rmpugned} .Eviction^{Noticedated 01111t2O2',(received} by the petiiioner on^{O211112021) issued by the Respondent} No.€i in respect of the property^{bearing H.. No: 9-4-86/81/7, Salarjung} Colony, Kakatiya Nagar, ilyderabad.^{pending disposalof the main writ petition.}

¶28

Counsel^{for the Petitioners : SRl. CHANDRASEN LAWOFFICES}

¶29

Counsel^{for the Respondents:GP FOR ENDOWMENTS}

¶30

The Court^{made the following: ORDER}

¶31

1

¶32

wp 29454.2021 NBK,I

¶33

TH H L l c B PA w RIT^P N 9 454 2

¶34

oRDE

¶35

This writ^{petition is filed seeking the following relief :} "to issue a^{Writ, Order or Direction'more} irn,f"ir,,^{one in tn" nature of writ of} mandamus,^{to dectare the impugned Evicti.on} ';;;;;; ;;lr"i- ot/tt/zozt (received bY '.1" '"li,i,.r", on 02'11'2021) issued bv !!" E:;:;;';;rt"io'a^{as ittesat' arbitrarv and as'a.inst} ';;;;;;;;t;"rs of rebn{anta charitabte and Hindu Retiqious^{Institutions and Endowments Act' 1987} ;;;';;;,;;:;;it 'ixr"d principtes^{or taw} .and.set' "r;;id;";;; t"me and consequenttv to direct^the respondents^{to removethe subjectproperty} 'i'iJ.ii-aarutz, Nanat Nagar' sata.raiuns ';;;;;;, niii'ioua rrom the tist or prohibitory properties^{as it does not correlate to Sy'No'285&} 286^{Guddimalkapur, Asifnagar'Hyderabadbut} falls within^{the purview ot Sy'No'l4l'142 & 143} ';;'s;;;ip:e; viitase, Hvderabad and pass such Z,tnl"r-or-ird"rs^{as this'Hon'bleCourt mav deSm} i'"ri rii",^{in the circumstancesof the case"}

¶36

The^{petitioneris the owner.andpossessor of house} bearing^{No.9-4-86/81/7in Survey Nos'141' L42' and 143' to an} extent of^{22O squareyards, situatedat Salarjung colony' Nanal} Nagar,^{Hyderabad,havingpurchasedthe same from one Sri K'} Lakshmi^{Narayana Bhat under a registered sale deed vide} Document^{No.3087 of 2011' dated 31'10'2011' While so' based} on a representation^{dated 29'02'2019made by the Chairmanof} the Trust^{Board -respondentNo'6 temple -respondent No'5'}

¶37

F!

¶38

2

¶39

wP_2s4s4-2021 ( NB(, J \

¶40

the Assistant Commi ssioner of the Endowments DepartmentNB(, submitted a report in R.C.No.B/30 ts/2016 dated 20.03 .2}tg. Respondent No.2 the Commissioner of the Endowments numbers Departmentco , requested the prohibition of 6.1 municipal do or rrelated to Sy.Nos.2g5 and 2g6 of Gudimalka Village, Asif Nagar Mandal pur Hyderabad. The petitioner submits that out of th e said 63 door numbers door nurnbers from 50 to 63 do not fall under Sy.Nos.2g5 and 286 but rather belong to Sy.Nos.141 742 and 743 of Shaikpet Village and Mandal Hyderabad. It rs stated that the subject propert), owned by the petiti oner was wrongly listed at S.No.63 and despite this, it does not belong to Sy.Nos.2g5 and 2g6. In spite of the petitioner making several representations to the respondent authorities requesting removal of the subject property from the prohibited list of 63 door numbers while enclosrng encumbrance certificates clearly showing that the propertY falls under Sy.w os.141 742 and 143 , no action has been t;rken by the {B?P^ondents. Instead the petitioner was issued the impugned q notice dated 01.71.2021 (received on 0.2.77.202t respondent No.6 ), directing the petitioner to vacate prernises within 1 5 days and to pay occupation and

3

wp-29454²⁰²¹ NBK'^I

I t

I I

damage^{charges of Rs'25'000/- per month from the date of the} alleged^{encroachment'Challengingthe same' the petitioner has} filed^the Present^{writ Petition'}

¶46

Heard Smt'^{B'NamrathReddy'learned counsel for} as well^{as learned Standing Counselfor} the Petitioner, Perused^{the record'} resPondent^No'6-temPle'

¶47

4 Copies^{of O.A.No'148 of 2022 filed by the petitioner} and^{O.A.No .54 of 2022 ftled by the temple with regard to} subject ProPerty^{are filed before this Court'}

¶48

5.^{While orderingnotice before admission' this Court'} directed^{tomaintainstatus quo with regardtoPhYsical} order^dated possessloⁿ obtaining^{as on that date vide} 23.tt.202t.

¶49

and 6^filed counter-affidavit 6. ResPondent^Nos'5 It is stated^{that basing on the} denying^{the writ averments'} directions^{of the DistrictCollector' Hyderabad' the Tahsildar'} conducted^{an enquiryand submittedreport dated 07'05'2021} stating^{that the subject property correlated Sy'Nos'285 and 286} and^{is a templelnam land and at no point of time neitherthe} petitioner^{nor his predecessorswere ownersof the subjectland}

t

A^-'-..r

wp-29454 2021 NA(,l

and the petitioner is trying to knock away the ternple land and assures that due process of law will be followed while evicting the petitioner from subject land and hence sought for dismissal of the writ petition.

¶54

Reply affidavit is also filed by the petitioner.

¶55

A perusal of the record discloses that the dispute relating to the subject property filed by the petitioner as well as the temple are pending before the Endowments tribunal.

¶56

9, In view of the above, without going into the merits of the case, this writ petition is disposed of clirecting the tribunal to adjudicate both the OA,s i.e., O.A.No. 14g of 2OZ2 and 54 of 2022, basing on its merits and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law, within a period of 6 months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Interim order passed by this Court, shall continue till then. No costs.

¶57

Miscellaneous petitions pending if a ny, shall stand closed.

¶58

I

¶59

SDAV.KAVITHA DEPUry REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY' . l-.-: .--,/ SECTION OFFICER

¶60

To,

¶61