Dismissed¶¶49

P. Harini v. The State of Telangana

Telangana HC15 Jul 2025WP/29441/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Telangana High Court, WP No. 29441 of 2022, decided 15-07-2025, Justice Surepalli Nanda (single Judge). Petitioner P. Harini (Deputy Registrar, cooperative society) challenged Charge Memo dated 11.05.2020 issued by Respondent No.2 (Commissioner for Cooperation & Registrar of Cooperative Societies); I.A. Nos. 1 & 2 of 2022 under Section 151 CPC sought suspension of the charge memo and action against Respondents 3 & 4 (including Smt. Vangala Sumithra). Petition DISMISSED AS WITHDRAWN WITHOUT COSTS in view of orders dated 15.07.2025 in W.P.No.25291 of 2023; miscellaneous petitions closed. Keywords: withdrawal, Article 226, cooperative society, charge memo, no costs.

What did the court decide?

None; the writ petition was dismissed as withdrawn without costs and the pending miscellaneous petitions were directed to stand closed. ¶¶49

P. Harini Vs The State of Telangana — Writ and Judicial Review | Telangana HC (2025)

¶1

t32521

¶2

IN THE HIGH^{COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA} AT HYDERABAD

¶3

(SPecial Original^{Jurisdiction)}

¶4

TUESDAY,THE^{FIFTEENTH DAY OF JULY} TWO THOUSAND^{AND TWENTY FIVE}

¶5

PRESENT

¶6

THE HONOURABLE^{MRS JUSTICE SUREPALLI NANDA}

¶7

WRIT PETITION^{NO:29M1 0F 2022}

¶8

Between:

¶9

P. Harini,^{W/o DasariHitesh'Aged.l?years' Occ' Deputy Registrar of} 1 M' Maheswari coooerative societiel'^{) od"o, "ocie,} N atg6 noa'^Fy-o- !1a1-Nb' ffi^{;ffii;;i.: il"iriii' nig'i- v u surg ud a' Hvd e ra bad-500045'}

¶10

...PETITIONER

¶11

AND

¶12

1 The State of^{Telangana, Rep by its Principal Secretary to Govemrnent'} Cooperation^{Department'Secretariat,Hyoeraoao'}

¶13

The Commissioner^{for Cooperationand Registrar.of CooperativeSoc'teties'} '' ri i:Fr"'"i, ci"[Jiurpi co*rilex' Nampallv' Hvderabad'

¶14

3.TheAdditionalRegistrar/StateCooperativeElectionAuthority,lll.Ftoor'" c;ti;k;ii;; Compi"x, Nampallv, Hvderabad'

¶15

Smt. Vangala^{Sumithra' Additional Registrar/ State CooperativeEle{tion}

¶16

Xijiii"'il,'rir-?lo;;, G'16;Llpi Compt6x' Nampallv' Hvderabad'

¶17

The District^{Cooperative Officer,Vikarabad District' Vikarabad'}

¶18

...RESPONDENTS

¶19

Petition under^{Article 226 of the Constitutionof lndia praylgthat in the} circumstances^{stated in i[.uniu"rit filed therewith,the High courtmay be} p"rtaining to the.impugned^Ch9r.9e Yt*-91'"d pleased to call for tn" '"*iO" 11 .O5.2O2O^{issued by tn" inO respondeniand set it aside by holding the sameas} bad, iltegal,^{irrational,one sided,' arbitrary' contraryto record ' contrary to logic'} hasty,biasedandpredetermineandunconstitutionalandconsequentlydirectthe to treat tne^{suspensionperiod as on duty and to take necessary} ;ft;;i; action against^{the 3rd ,"."p-o-riOlnt-l4ih- respondent foi demonstratingbias and} ilft#il sivingtarse^{i,irorrn"tionmutf information, leading to issuance of hastv} and unsupporteO^{impugneO lh"'g" *"rnoby issuance of Writ of Mandamus or} issue any^{Writ, Order or Direction}

¶20

lA NO: 1 OF 2022

¶21

Petition under section 151 cPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition, the High court may be pleased to direct the respondents No.1 and 2 to take necessary action against the 3rd respondenV 4th respondent, who has acted vindictively

¶22

lA NO: 2 OF 2022

¶23

Petition under Section 151 cPc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition, the High court may be pleased to suspend the impugned Charge Memo dated 11.O5.2O2O issued by the 2nd respondent

¶24

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRl. J SUDHEER

¶25

Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1,2&5: Gp FOR COOPERATION

¶26

Counsel for the Respondent Nos.3&4: SRI M PRATHEEK REDDY

¶27

The Court made the following: ORDER

¶28

HON'BLE MRS^{JUSTICESUREPALLI NANDA} WRIT I IO N -29441 F o2

¶29

ORDER:

¶30

Sri l.sudheer,^{learned counsel appearingon behalf of} the^{petitioner seekswithdrawalof the present writ petition} in view of the^{orders dated t5 'O7 '2025 passedin} W.P.No.25291^{of 2023.}

¶31

?:^{Takinginto consideration the said submission} made by the^{learned counsel appearing on behalfof} the^{petitionerand duly bringing the said submission} on record,^{the writpetitionisdismissedas} withdrawn.^{Jlowever, there shall be no order as to}

¶32

costs

¶33

As a sequel,^{the miscellaneouspetitions'ifany'}

¶34

pending in the Writ^{Petition shall also standclosed'}

¶35

S /. L. VIJAYA LAKSHMI TANT REGISTRAR

¶36

//TRUE COPYII

¶37

CTION OFFICER