The High Court of Telangana dismissed a writ petition challenging a rejection under the Vivadse Vishwas Scheme. The court acted upon the submission that the petitioner had settled the dispute with the department and voluntarily withdrew the petition. No costs were awarded.
Writ petition dismissed as withdrawn with no costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
13447 l
HIGH COURTFORTHE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (SPecial OriginalJurisdiction)
THURSDAY,THE THIRD DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSANDANDTWENTYFIVE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLESRIJUSTICE P.SAM KOSHY AND THE HONOURABLESRI JUSTICE NARSING RAO NANDIKONDA
WRIT PETITIONNO:29 4020F 2021
Between:
Mr. SushilKumar Agaruval,5-g-.3ot1124-25,F]at No. 103' Legend Apartments, iii.n'e"roagr',Hvdeiabad 500029' Telangana
...PETITIONER
AND
...RESPONDENTS
PetitionunderArticle226oflheConstitutionoflndiaprayingthatinthe circumstancesstatedintheaffidavitfiledtherewith,theHighCourtmaybe pleasedtotssueaWrit,Orderordirectionparticularlyoneinthenatureofa WRIToFIVIANDAMUS(i)todirecttheRespondentstoissueForm-3certificate tothePetitionerunderVivadSeVishwasSchemeastheappealfiledbythe petitioner is still pending beforethe Department(ii) to declare as illegal and set asidethe rejection under Vivadse Vishwas Schemeas being arbitrary, violative ofprinciplesofnaturaljustice,withoutauthorityoflawandviolativeofArticle f 9(f Xg)and Article 14 of the Constitutionof lndia'
lA NO: 1 OF 2o21
petition under section 151 cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fired in support of the petition, the High court may be preased to permit the petitioner to amend paragraph 1g and derete ground c of the writ petition affidavit and arso amend main prayer in w.p.No 24g02 0f 2021 in the interest ofjustice.
Counsel for thepetitioner: SRI KARAN TALWAR
Counsel forthe Respondent No.1 to 4: Ms. B.SAPNA REDDY, SC FOR lT Counsel for the Respondent No.5: SRI GADI PRAVEEN KUMAR, DEPUTY SOLICITOR ECruCN'iNr- OF INDIA
The Court made the following: ORDER
THE HONOURABLESRI JUSTTCEP'SAM KOSHY AND THE HONOURABLESRTJUSTICE NARSTNGRAO NANDIKONDA
WzuT PETITION No.29 4ll2 of 2021
RDER (per Hon'bleSri JusliceNarsingRuo \ttrulikonekr)
Today,when the matter is taken after hearing'the learned
counselfor the petitionersubmits that the petitioner has settled the
disputewith the depaftment under VivadSe Vishwas Scheme and
therelore.prays lor withdrawal ol the prcscnt s rit pctition'
withdrawn.No costs'
Consequently,miscellaneous petitiorrspending' il any' shall
stand closed.
SD/. T.JAYASREE DEPUWREGISTRAR
//TRUECOPY//
SECTIONOFFICER
To,
BS o TKS
HIGH COURT
DATED:03 t07t2025
ORDER
-"=''l.: !: llr
.i{ €
Y c,.
,.)
.)o
1r ruE 2025
*
^t- ,,,,
!),. .,.
WP.No.29402 of 2021
DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS WITHDRAWN,
WITHOUT COSTS
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a writ petition challenging a rejection under the Vivadse Vishwas Scheme shall be maintained after the petitioner settles the dispute.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Mr. Sushil Kumar Agaruval
Designated Authority, Principal Commissioner of Income Tax-IV
Commissioner of Income Tax Appeals-IV
Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), National Faceless Appeals Centre
Union of India
P. SAM KOSHY
NARSING RAO NANDIKONDA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
