Writ petition seeking counselling and admission into PG medical courses under NRI/Institutional quota; disposed of by directing the University to decide the petitioner's pending representation within seven working days.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[3446 I
, I I ! I I l I l i l l
HrGH COURTFORTHE STATEOF TELAry.G-4N+AT HYDERABAD ' -' idpecial Original Jurisdiction)
FRIDAY,THE THIRTY FIRSTDAY OF JAN_UARY TWO THOUSANDAND TWENTYFIVE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLETHE ACTTNGCHIEF JUSTICE SUJOYPAUL AND THE HONOURABLESMT JUSTICE RENUKAYARA
WRIT PETITTONNO: 2869oF 2025
Between:
Dr. Gokul SaiCharan, C/o Gokul HariVardhan' Aoe 29 vears' Plot No 20 WP' Aoricultural Cotony,HasthinauramXarmanlnit''Saroornagar'K'V iiZngiieoovTelangina - 500 079
...PETITIONER
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petitionunder Article 226 of lhe Constitutionof lndia praying that in the circumstancesstated in the affidavit filed therewith' the High Court maybe pleased to issueany appropriatewrit' order or direction' one more particularly in the natureof writ of Mandamus,declaring the actionof the Respondents, particularly RespondentNo 2' in not considering the Petitioner for counseling and admissionsinto PG MedicalCourses under NRI/ lnstitutionalQuota for the academicyeat2024-25asillegal'arbitrary'unconstitutionalandconsequently direct theRespondents to consider and includethe nameof the Petitioner in the next round ofcounseling and admission into the PG lr/edical Courses under NRI/ lnstitutional Quotafor the academicyear 2024- 25'
r-z
l i I i I I I ] I rl
IANO: 1O F 2025
Petition under section '1 51 cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fired in support of the petition, the High court may be preased to issue interim direct ons directing the 2nd Respondent to consider the petitioner under NRI/ Institutio nal euota in the counseling and admission into the pG lvedical courses for the academ ic year 2024-25 for next round of counsering, pending disposal of the above writ petition.
Counsel for the petitioner: SRI SRINIVASA RAO PACHWA
Counsel for the Respondent No.1: Gp FOR MEDICAL HEALTH FW Counsel for the Respondent No.2: SRI T.SHARATH, SC FOR KNRUHS
The Court made the following: ORDER
i : I I
THE HON'BLETHE ACTINGCTIIEFJUSTICESUJOY PAUL
AND
THEHON'BLE SMT.JUSTICE RENUKA YARA
WRITPETITION No'2869of 20-25, oRDER: (per the llon-n'bb tn" edingchief Justice sujoyPaul)
t Il
Sri SrinivasaRao Pachwa'learned counsel for the petitioner and SriT.Sharath,Iearned StandingCounselfor Kaloj i Narayana Rao Universityof HealthSciences for respondentNo'2'
r
I I ) l
;
2
Interlocutory applications, if any pending, shall also
stand closed.
SD/- N. CHANDRA SEKHAR ASSI GISTRAR
//TRUE COPY//
SE OFFICER
To,
BSR
I I I I Ii I
CC TODAY
HIGH COURT
DATED: 3110112025
ORDER
WP.No.2869 of 2025
...e !i Trt i,:.
a( 7Zo
31 iiiN ,'.[?t
i l)F:li)^, t.i' .::
DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION, WITHOUT COSTS
1 issue framed by the court
Should respondent No.2 be directed to decide the petitioner's representation for inclusion in NRI/Institutional Quota PG medical counselling?
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Dr. Gokul Sai Charan
State of Telangana, rep by its Principal Secretary, Department of Health, Medical and Family Welfare
Kaloji Narayana Rao University of Health Sciences, Registrar, Warangal
Sujoy Paul
Renuka Yara
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
