Writ petition concerning declaration of probation as Assistant Director and related increments and promotion was withdrawn by the petitioner seeking liberty to file a fresh writ petition. The High Court granted the liberty and dismissed the petition as withdrawn without costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[33001
HIGH COURTFORTHE STATEOF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (SPecial Original Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY,THETWELFTHDAYOF MARCH TWO THOUSANDAND TWENTYFIVE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLESRI JUSTICE NAGESH BHEEMAPAKA
WR]T PETITI ONNO:27920 OF 2019
Between:
G. Dhameetha, d/oG.Ram Das, Aged45 Lears(POP- 22110/1973)'.Asst' 6i;;#, T-s. F"ien.icsiienieLab5ratory,irea uilts, Hvderabad'R/o Alwal' Hyderabad.
...PETITIONER
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article226 oI lhe constitutionof lndia praying that in the circumstancesstated in the affidavitfiled therewith,the High Court -may be pleasedtoissueanappropriateWrit,orderorDirection,moreparticularlyonein i6"-n"trr" of aWrit oi tvlandamus declaring the action of the Respondentsin not O."frrlngpetitioners probation in the Assistant Director categoryon the ground -of ;;;J";;y;iwP.N.i2B33 of 2013 and therebv denving annual grade increments' LonsiOeration forpromotion for promotion to t-he post of Joint Director in the slot earmarkedfortheScheduledCastecandidatesandonthebasisofSenbrityaS ;;id;;Litr"t,iflegat a-nd viotativeof Artictes 14 and 16 of the constitutionof f"Oir unO consequJnttyholdthat the petitioneris entitled to have her probation declared withoutreferencelo the pendencyof W'P No'12833of 20'13 withall benefits includinginciements, arrearsof pay andpromotion to the "onr"qr"ntirl higher category ofJoint Director in the interestof justice
IAN O: 1 OF 2019
PetitionunderSectionl5lcPCprayingthatinthecircumstancesStatedin the affidavitfiled in support of the petition, ttre Hign Court maybe pleasedto.direct if," i"ipo"O"ntsto consider the case of the petiiioner for declarationof probation
3lqfor promotion lc the postof Joint Directorwithout referenc(,r lo pendency of W.P. No.12833 of 2013
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRl. V RAVICHANDRAN
Counsel for the Respondents: Gp FOR HOME
The Court made th: following: ORDER
IION'BLE SRI JUSTICE NAGESH BHEEMAPAXA
WRIT PETITION N0.27920 0F. 2019
ORAL ORDER:
Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to w'ithdraw the present Writ petition w.ith liberty to file a fresh Writ Petition. He had made the endorsement to the said effect on the bundle.
case, there shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any,
pending in the Writ Petition shall stand closed.
SD/- T. JAYASREE PUTY REGISTRAR
//TRUE COPY//
SECTION OFFICER
To,
cI
KKS -. GJPKt-
HIGH COURT
DATED:1 210:112025
ORDER
,,.{6'' .'tnl. i;L l; 4
,7>+
1r
o
13 ,tuN 2t6 z
Ot
i
o,-..
i::-- ....- ,--
WP.No.27920 of 2019
DISMISSING'THE WRIT PETITION AS WITHDF.AWN WITHOUT GOSTS
6,e&A
Vr
75
3o
1 provisions across 1 enactments
G. Dhameetha
The State of Telangana, Rep. by the Principal Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad
The Director General of Police, Telangana State, Saifabad, Hyderabad
The Director, T.S. Forensic Science Laboratory, Red Hills, Hyderabad
Nagesh Bheemapaka
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
