Dismissed

Mohammed Fazil Khan and Co. v. The State of Telangana

Telangana HC7 Jan 2025WP/279/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner firm sought release of balance payment under an award of the Sports Authority of Andhra Pradesh. Counsel sought withdrawal with liberty to file a civil suit; the court allowed the prayer and dismissed the writ petition as withdrawn.

What did the court decide?

Liberty granted to file a civil suit; petition dismissed as withdrawn, no costs, interlocutory applications closed.

Mohammed Fazil Khan and Co. Vs The State… — Contract and Commercial Disputes | Telangana HC (2025)

¶1

[³⁴³⁰ I

¶2

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶3

TUESDAY,THE SEVENTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUJOY PAUL AND THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE G.RADHA RANI

¶6

WRIT PETITION NO: 279 OF 2025

¶7

Between:

¶8

Mohammed Fazil Khan and Co., Hirers and Decorators, 68, M.G.Road, Secunderabad, Rep. by its Partner, Mansoor Khan, S/o. Late Mohd.Fiaz^Khan

¶9

...PETITlONER

¶10

AND

¶11

The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Tourism and Sports, Secretariat, Hyderabad

¶12

The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep by its Principal Secretary,^{Youth Services,} Tourism and Sports, Secretariat, Amaravati.

¶13

The Vice Chairman and Managing Director, Sports Authority of^Andhra Pradesh, Vijayawada, Andhra Pradesh

¶14

The Vice Chairman and Managing Director, Sports Authority of Telangana. L.B Stadium, Hyderabad.

¶15

The Chairman, Sports Authority of Telangana. L.B Stadium, Hyderabad.

¶16

...RESPONDENTS

¶17

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia^praying that^{in the} circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the^{High Court may be} pleased to issue an appropriate Writ Order or direction more^particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, to declare the actions of the Official^Respondent No.3 to No.S in not releasing the balance^payment of Rs.80,29,726l-^(Rupees Eighty lakhs twenty-nine thousand seven hundred and twenty-six^{only) as per the} award of 2nd respondent dt- 11.10.2003 as illegal, arbitrary^{and consequently} direct the Respondent No.3 to No.5 to forthwith release^{the balance amount of} Rs.80,29,726l-(Rupees Eighty lakhs twenty-nine thousand^{sevenhundredand} twenty-six only) to the petitioner

¶18

lA NO: 1 OF 2025

¶19

Petition under Section 151 CPC^praying that in^{the circumstancesstated} in the affidavit filed in support of the^petition, the High^{Courtmaybe pleased to} direct the Respondent No 3 to No.5 to consider the^{representation of the} petitioner's firm dt- 2610912024, pending disposal of the main writ^petition

¶20

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRl. MOHAMMED NAWAZ HYDER^ALI

¶21

Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 1,4&5: AGP FOR SPORTS AND^TOURISM

¶22

Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 2&3: SRI A. RAGHURAM, AGP FOR SPORTS The Court made the following: ORDER

¶23

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUJOY PAUL

¶24

AND

¶25

THE HON'BLE Dr. JUSTICE G. RADHA RANI

¶26

WRIT PETITION No.279 of 2025

¶27

ORDER (per Hon'ble Sn SP,4

¶28

Sri MD. Nawaz Hyder Ali, learned counsel for the petitioner; Sri G. Praveen Kumar, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Telangana Sports and Tourism, for respondent Nos. l, 4 and 5 and Sri A. Raghuram, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Andhra Pradesh Sports and Tourism, for respondent Nos.2 and 3.

¶29

Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks to withdraw this petition with the liberty to file a civil suit for the present grievance.

¶30

3 Prayer allowed.

¶31

Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty prayed for. No costs.

¶32

lnterlocutory applications, if any pending, shall also stand

¶33

closed.

¶34

/-SD/- N.SRIHARI ASSI T REGISTRAR

,/TRUE^COPY//

ECTION OFF^ICER

To,

One CC to^{SRl. MOHAMMED NAWAZ HYD-ERALI'Advocate [OPUC]'} i. il; 6dri""cc^{Fon sFo[is,liigi Eourtror the State of Telansana at} Hyderabad [OUTI 3. Two CD^CoPies

BM PSK Yfi

HIGH COURT

DATED:0710112025

ORDER

,g-
$ E Sl
16 q
+
o
1t rra zrtn i
t
[) /:;;p41r*f,e a

¶45

WP.No.279 ot 2025

¶46

DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS WITHDRAWN WITHOUT COSTS ?+ t{-\u\ 6."i-)

Mohammed Fazil Khan and Co. v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mohammed Fazil Khan and Co. v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Kanumuru Rahul Raju Vs Assistant Commissioner (St)

M/s Raj Steels Vs Assistant Commssioner (St)

Sri P.Jaya Prakash Vs The State of Telangana

Dongfang Electric Corporation Ltd. Vs Commissioner of Income Tax

Kummari Praveena, Vs The State of Telangana

Dongfang Electric Corporation Ltd. Vs Commissioner of Income Tax