Venkumahanthi Naresh Kumar v. Union of India
Case brief
What is this about?
Writ of mandamus; coercive and harassing recovery of loans by banks/NBFCs; recovery agents; RBI Circular dated 12.08.2022 (No. RBI/2022-23/108, DOR.ORG.REC.65/21.04.158/2022-23); due process; Articles 14, 19 and 21; Article 226; ICICI Bank Ltd. v. Prakash Kaur; ICICI Bank v. Shanti Devi Sharma; order in W.P.No.5200 of 2024 dated 25.04.2024 followed; disposed of with directions; no costs; Telangana High Court, 08-10-2025; borrower versus banks and financial institutions; respondents included Union of India, RBI, Kotak Mahindra Bank, HDFC Bank, Yes Bank, Bajaj Finance, Muthoot Finance, AU Small Finance Bank and others.
What did the court decide?
Writ petition disposed of directing the respondent authorities and their agents to scrupulously follow the RBI guidelines/instructions in the Circular dated 12.08.2022 and the Supreme Court judgments in ICICI Bank Ltd. v. Prakash Kaur and ICICI Bank v. Shanti Devi Sharma while recovering loan amounts from the petitioner; no costs; pending miscellaneous applications, if any, closed.