Writ petition seeking consideration of a representation to the Tahsildar and restraint on registration of sale deeds was pending since 2017; with no representation by the petitioner on two hearing dates, the High Court dismissed it for non-prosecution/default.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[3302 ]
HIGH COURTFORTHE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (SPecial OriginalJurisdiction)
TUESDAY, THEFIRST DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSANDANDTWENTY FIVE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLESRI JUSTICE K. SARATH
WRIT PETITION NO: 266 oF 2017
Between:
Neerudu Chandraiah,W/o: Late Atchaiha, qSe!. qqoyt50 years' Occ: Painter' iilttir^*rguiiownand tt4andal, Nalgonda District'
...PETITIONER
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petitlon underArticle 226 of the Constitution of lndiapraying that in the circumstancesstated in the affidavit filedtherewith'the High Court maybe pleased to issue anappropriateWrit, Order or direction' more particularlyone in the nature ofWrit of Mandamusto declare the action of the 2nd Respo ndent for notconsidertherepresentationfiledbythePetitioneron0l.ll.2016isillegal, arbitrary, Contraryto law, Un Constitutionaland consequentlydirect the2nd RespondenttoConsidertherepresentationfiledbythePetitioneron0l.ll.2016 and further directthe 3'd Respondent not to Register any sale deedsin Sy No 166,167,168,201Situatedat Huzqrnqgql Villageand Sy No 131 '132' 2O1situated BurugaddaVillage, Huzurnagar Mandal, Nalgonda Districtby the 4th Respondent until thefinalorderpassedby the 2nd Respondentin connection with the representationfiledby the Petitioner on 0'1 1 1'2016'
l.A. NO:10F 2017(WPM P. NO : 300 0F 20171
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fired in support of the writ petition, the High court may be preased to direct the 2nd Respondent to consider the representation fired by the petitioner on 01-11-2016 pending disposal of the main writ petition.
Counsel for the petitioner: SRI K. JOSEPH (NOT PRESENT) Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 to 3: Gp FOR REVENUE Counset for the Respondent No.4: SRI M. V. HANUMANTHA RAO The Court made the following: ORDER
THE HONOURABLESRI JUSTICE K'SARATH
WRTT PETITIONNo.266of 2017
ORDER:
This petitionis comingfor hearing since 2Ol7' On 17.06.2025when the matterwascalled,there was no representationon behalf of the petitioner' therefore' the matter wasdirectedto be listed under the caption"for Dismissal".Even today,when the matter is called' thereis no rcpresentation.Itseems that the petitioner is not interestedto prosecutethis case'
Writ Petitionshall also stand closed'
SDI L. VIJAYA LAXMI TANT REGISTRAR
//TRUE COPYII
ECTION OFFICER
To, 1 One CC to Sri K. Joseph, Advocate [OPUC] 2 Two CCs to GP for Revenue, High Court for the State of Telangana, at Hyderabad [OUT]
One CC to Sri M. V. Hanumantha Rao, Advocate [OPUC] 4 Two CD Copies TJ GJP t-I '/fr)//t/
HIGH COURT
DATED:01tO7t2O2S
ORDER
WP.No.266 of 201t
--.?=-:-::-'-
,: ..'- -'--.-,'. ' ilf. 5;.: -_ <br>z .-' (- <br>', ,.) <br>it, )
ll-: 25 stP mtr
!r9
.+
''.i Dr.^
.t/
DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION FOR NON. PROSECUTION/DEFAULT WIiiOUr COSTS
)11
e,,
i )r'
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition should be dismissed when the petitioner repeatedly fails to appear or prosecute the case?
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Neerudu Chandraiah
The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Revenue Department
The Mandal Tahsildar, Huzurnagar, Nalgonda District
Sub Registrar, Huzurnagar, Nalgonda District
Kamisetty Sheshagiri
K. Sarath
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
