"16. It is trite that the law declared by the SupremeCourt is binding throughout the country underArticle 141 of the Constitution of India. It is noteworthythat by the time the judgment in Uma Devi's case (supra), was rendered,the p.ovisions of Act 2 of 1994 and G.O. Ms.No.212,dated 22.4.t994, were in existence. TheSupreme Court,while denouncing thepractice of regularizationand absorptionof f persons, who entered service through back doors bygiving a go-bye to the due procedureprescribedfor appointmentsto one-time public posts, consciously ordered for absorption/regula rization of those,who were working fora period of not less than 10years. Ithas given directions in this regard to all the State Governmentsand also Union of India' The Supreme Court ispresumed tobe consciousof variousState enactments such as Act 2 of 1994and executive orders such as G.O. Ms. No.212, dated 22.4.1994,while giving directions in Para No.53 of thejudgment in IJmaDevi's case (supra).But still, it has not made any exceptionin favour of the States where State enactments banningregu la rization/a bsorptionexist' r Act 1(,0 G.O. No.2 te 22.4. qq4- do not hittle .low n the widrh and t he ud n Man s do not h tr the r ctio UE t Su me Cou rt in Para 53 of its udoment tn Uma Devt s ra refor ot er i ble th resoondentsto kes he ter t r nder Act 2 of 199 4 and G. o. Ms. o.21,2. dated 22.4 -19 94 to de n re tl a ttzati nt o the etitaoners. vvho have ad mltted satisfied the criteria laid down inP ara No.53 of the iuoment in uma Devi's ca (suora).
