Writ petition challenging proceedings concerning regularization of plots in Sy.No.81 of Bowenpally Village. Neither the petitioners nor counsel appeared on two hearing dates; the writ petition was dismissed for non-prosecution with no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[32s5 ]
HIGH COURTFOR THE STATEOF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY,THE TENTHDAYOF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTYFIVE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLESRI JUSTICEN.V.SHRAVAN KUMAR
WRIT PETITION NO: 24880OF 2012
Between:
AND
...RESPONDENTS
PetitionUnderArticle226oftheConstitutionoflndiaprayingthatinthe circumstances stated in theaffidavitfiled therewith,the High Court may be pleased to issue writ or directionpreferablya writ of Mandamus, declaringthe proceedings issued by the Respondent No.3bearingNo.R2l1815/2010and R2I181612O1O, daledOGlO7l2O12 in respect of the plots Nos l9-A and 19-B respectively of the Petitioners in Sy.No. 81 of BowenpallyVillage,as illegal, arbitrary, without.iurisdiction,discriminatoryand violative of Article-300-Aof the constitution of lndia and theG.O.Ms.No.166dt.16- 2-2008 and consequently direct the RespondentsNos. 1 and 3 to regularizethe plots of the Petitionersin Sy.No.81 ofBowenPallYVillage
t.A. NO:1 oF2012(wPMP. NO:3 174.3 0F 20 12t
Petition under Section 151 CpC pra in the ying that in the circumstances stated affidavit filed in support of the wr please it petition, the High Court may be d to suspend the proceedings issu ed by the Respondent No.3 bearin No.R2I 1815t201O and R2/1816t201O, dated O6t07tZO12 .A. NO: 10F 2013 MP NO: 293 OF 2013
Between
AND
....PETITIONERYRESPONDENT NO.2
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under section 151 cDn ^.^..:-- ., ...RESPONDENTS rhe arridav*,,,"0," ",oo".l11 ;:"rffiil:,Hil^:ff ffiT:.r.",:* .i passed in wp No 31743 of 2012 in wpNo 24880 of ]#::::: ffJ:;;.""
Counsel for the petitioner: SRl. SAMUDRALA ANANTARAM(Not present) Counsel forthe Respondent Nos. 1,3&4: AGp FOR REVENUE Counsel for the Responden ot'"A GouD'sc FoR HMDA The court made the r.,,","t1,
.,-'i{ifraalnk{ .. -.)-.t ' u
I j
HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.V.SHRAVAN KUMAR
WRIT PETITION No.2 4E8O of 2012
ORDER
On O8.O4.2025, when the matter was taken up for hearing, none has appeared on beharf of the petitioner and the matter was listed to today under the caption .for dismissal,. Even toclay also, when the matter is taken up there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner either physically or in virtual mode. Flence, there is no other option to this Court exccpt to dismiss lhe Writ petition for non prosecution.
As sequcl to it, Miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall stand dismissed
SD/. L. VIJAYA LAXMI ASS TANT REGISTRAR SECTION OFFICER
//TRUE COPY//
To,
IVo"*"""0.r1",f,_i.FoR
4- Two CD CopiesTwo CD CopiesCD CopiesCopies
Bt/
I (
HIGH COURT
DATED:1010412025
ORDER
WP.No.24880 ot 2012
3 1HE SI4 16.
o(
o)e
O 2 B JUil zIE
/
* -t/
. a,/
9r-"., ^-. ' ' -//
DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION FOR NON.PROSECUTION WITHOUT COSTS
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Smt. Rafat Fatima
Smt. Zainab Sultana
The Government of Andhra Pradesh, represented by its Principal Secretary, Revenue Department
The Hyderabad Metropolitan Development Authority (HMDA), represented by its Commissioner/Chairman
The District Collector, Hyderabad
The Chief Commissioner of Land Administration, A.P.
N.V. Shravan Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
