Sunitha Singh v. The Union of India
Case brief
What is this about?
Recovery agent harassment; borrower harassment by banks and financial institutions; direction to follow RBI circular dated 12.08.2022 and Supreme Court judgments in ICICI Bank Ltd. v. Prakash Kaur and ICICI Bank v. Shanti Devi Sharma during loan recovery; writ of mandamus under Article 226; respondents included Union of India, RBI, Mas Financial Services, ICICI Bank, IndusInd Bank, Mahindra and Mahindra Finance, Clix Capital, Kisetsu Saison Finance, SBM Bank and Bajaj Finance; disposed in terms of earlier order in W.P.No.5200 of 2024 dated 25.04.2024; counsel for respondent Nos. 1, 4, 5, 6, 8 and 10 had no objection; no counsel recorded for respondent Nos. 3, 7 and 8; disposed without costs; interim application under Section 151 CPC closed; Telangana High Court, Justice Nagesh Bheemapaka, W.P. No. 24870 of 2025, decided 13.10.2025.
What did the court decide?
Writ petition disposed of directing the respondent authorities and their agents to scrupulously follow the RBI guidelines/instructions in its circular dated 12.08.2022 and the Supreme Court judgments in ICICI Bank Ltd. v. Prakash Kaur and ICICI Bank v. Shanti Devi Sharma while recovering the loan amounts from the petitioner; no costs; pending miscellaneous applications closed.