Disposed

D. Bheem Shankar v. The State of Telangana

Telangana HC1 Sept 2025WP/24811/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner sought a mandamus directing authorities to hear and dispose of his pending eviction suit before the ITDA Project Officer, pending since 2021. The Government Pleader undertook expeditious disposal; without examining merits, the court directed disposal within eight weeks after hearing all parties.

What did the court decide?

Respondents directed to dispose of the pending suit LTR No. A4/CPC/1344 of 2021 within eight weeks after hearing all parties; miscellaneous applications closed.

D. Bheem Shankar Vs The State of Telangana — Property and Title | Telangana HC (2025)

¶1

¶2

[^{3300 ]}

¶3

HIGH COURT^{FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANAAT HYDERABAD} (SPecial Original^{Jurisdiction)}

¶4

MONDAY,^{THE FIRST DAY OF SEPTEMBER} TWO THOUSAND^{AND TWENTY FIVE}

¶5

PRESENT

¶6

THE HONOURABLE^{SRI JUSTICE NAGESH BHEEMAPAKA}

¶7

WRIT PET^{ITTONNO: 24811oF 2025}

¶8

Between:

¶9

D Bheem^{Shankar, S/o Late D Manohar Elg' ,lS9 72 vts ' Occ RetiredGovt} Employee.^{R/o Thandur} '"'utE^{tl'#i'ri""dlj'oLi roir.narum6heem Asifabad}

¶10

...PETITIONER

¶11

AND

¶12

1 The State of^{Telangana,Rep.by. its,PrincipalSecretary'Revenue} Department.^{Secretariat, HyderaDao}

¶13

2 The District^{Collector, District KomarambheemAsifabad'}

¶14

3 The Addl^{Agentto GovernmentCum ProjectOfficer'ITDA Adilabad HQRS'} Utnoor, District^Adilabacl'

¶15

4 lvlrs. lVleena 89 years, occ^{Jarn, Business, W/oLate Sunil fiH;;il;altietlampalti Subhakaran,Manikchand Choradia' fiIandalBellampalliAged}

¶16

t ..RESPONDENTS

¶17

Petition under Article^{226 of the Constitutionof lndiaprayingthat in the} circumstances^stated tn the affidavit^{f iled therewith} '^{theHigh CourtmaY be} of Mandamus^{declaringthe inactionof Respondent Nos'2} pleased to issue^{a Writ} ial and disposing^{of the Petitionerspending civil matter} and 3^{in conducting tr} vide no^{LTRNO'A4/CPCI 1344 OF 2021)as illegal'} (Eviction Suit of²⁰²¹ to th'e^{Telangana Agency Rules'1924' and in violation of} arbitrary,^{arid contrarY} the^judgment of this Honourable^{Court in CRP 1959 of 2024 andDirect} Respondent^N o.2or3,asthecasemaybe'toimmediatelytakeup'hear'and Petitioner's^{pending civil suit no LTR NO A4ICPC/1344 OF2021} dispose of^the within a^{fixed time frame from the date of receipt of this order}

¶18

---l

¶19

lA NO:'l oF 2025

¶20

Petition under section 151 cPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be preased to direct Respondent Nos 2 and 3 to fix an early date of hearing LTR NO A4lCpc/1344 0F 2021in and proceed with the matter in accordance with raw.

¶21

Counsel for the petitioner : SRt POLAMPELLI RAJU

¶22

Counsel for the Respondents No.1to3 : Gp FOR REVENUE

¶23

Counsel for the Respondents No.4 :

¶24

The Court made the following: ORDER

t (

THE^{HON,BLESRI JUSTICENAGESH BHEEMAPAXA} No.2^4811OF 2 o25 wRlT PETITI^ON

¶29

ORD^ER

¶30

'lhe challenge^{in the present Writ Petitionis to inactionof} t Nos.2^{& 3 in conductingtrial and disposing of the} responden s pending^{evictionsttit uide LTR No'A4/CPCIl34a of} petitioner' 202 i,^as being^{iliegaland to direct the respondentsto dispose of} lhe same by fixing^{a time frame'}

¶31

and 2. Hearcl^{learned counsel for the} petitloner for lcarnecl^{GovernmentPleaderforRevenueappearing} rcsponcients^{No' I to 3'}

¶32

trvidenlly,^{the subject suit preferredby the petitioner before} Lhe 3"1^{respondentis pending since'202 1 '}

¶33

Learned^{Government Pieader for Revenuesubmitsthat ihe} resporrdents^{will conduct/ concludetrial and disposL pi the subject} suit as expeditiously^{as possible'}

¶34

In view of the^{above submissions'without going into the} merits of the^{matter, the Writ Petition is disposed of directingthe} respor.clents to^{disposeof the subject suit preferred by the} petitioner within a period of eight^{(08) weeks from the date of} receipt of a copy of this order, after giving an opportunity^of hearing to all the parties concerned, in accordance with la<sup>r. No ordcr as to costs.

¶35

¶36

Consequently,

¶37

mrscellancou s application s, pending if any, shall stand closed.

¶38

)

¶39

D/-MOHD. ISMAIL UTY REGISTRAR //TRUE COPYII ECTION OFFICER U

¶40

To,

¶41

The Principar secretary, Revenue Department, secretariat, state of I elangana. Hyderabad'

¶42

The District Collector, District Komarambheem Asifabad.

¶43

The Addl Aqent to Govr Utnoor, Disfrict Adit"brirn."nt Cum^project Officer, ITDA Adilabad HeRS,

¶44

4 One CC to SRI POLAMPELLI RAJU, Advocate. IOPUC]

¶45

Two CCs to GP FOR REVENUE, High Court for the State of Telangana. lourl

¶46

Two CD Copies

BSK

\ ,l

HIGH COURT

DATED:01t0912025

.f,./;\-
i(,
li 1[ SEP eM
t)::o -t ,ll-! '

ORDER

WP.No.24811 of ZlZs

DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS

¶58

h<br>tolT let-

D. Bheem Shankar v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

D. Bheem Shankar v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M/s.Datum Vilcom Private Limited Vs The State of Telangana

M/ s. Sri Krishna Pharmaceuticals Vs The State of Telangana

M/s. Siri Farms Vs The State of Telangana

M/s.Kan Enterprises, Vs The Indian Oil Corporation Limited

B. Dasaiah Vs The State of Telangana

Smt Pola Sujatha Vs The State of Telangana