The petitioner challenged the respondents for not permitting admission to Computer Science and Engineering. The petitioner subsequently sought to withdraw the petition with the consent of the respondents.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[3166 ]
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY ,THE NINTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.VINOD KUMAR
WRIT PETITION NO:24792 OF 2024
Between:
Mudige Shruthi Dio.Srishailam, Aged about.17years, Resident ofH.No.2-15, Band-alemoor, Manchal, Ranga Reddy District, Represented by her fathbr and Natural Guardian, M.Srishailam, Son of Ramulu, aged about 46years, residentof Resident of H.No.2-15, Bandalemoor, Manchal, Ranga.Reddy District.
...PETITIONER
AND
\
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution oflndiaprayingthat in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, theHigh Courtmay be pteased to issue a Writ, order or direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of respondents in notpermitting the petitioner to pay the fees and admitting the petitioner to Computer Sciences and Engineering (CSC) Course in 3rd respondent college, as arbitrary,irregularand consequentially direct the respondents topermit thepetitioner to pay the fee as fixed by the 2nd respondent and further direct the 3rd respondent toadmit the petitioner in the course i.e., Computer Science and Engineering (CSC) asper Provisional Allotment Order issued by the 2nd respondent
lA NO: 1 OF 2024
Petition under Section 151 CPCpraying that in thecircumstances statedin the affidavit filed in support of thepetition,the HighCourt may be pleased to direct the 3rd respondent to accept the TuitionFee and admit her in Computer Science
and Engineering (CSC) Course as per Provisional Allotnrent Order issued by the 2nd respondent, pending disposal of the Writ Petition
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRl. B. NARSING
Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1&2: SRI C. VANi REDDy SC FOR TSCHE Counsel for the Respondent No.3: --
The Court made the following: ORDER
itr.'- '
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE T. VINOD KUMAR
IIIRIT PETITION No.24792 of 2024
ORDER:
After making initial submissions,learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission ofthe Court to withdraw this Writ Petition.
4 . Consequently, miscellaneouspetitions pending, if
any, shall stand closed.
I
SD/-V. KAVITHA ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
//TRUE COPY//
ECTION OFFICER
To,
f
i I
HIGH COURT
DATED:0910112025
/."; ,
f r
lr.- '1 t a.J1J
o
*
\l -.,,,,, . '.i,Q
ORDER
WP.No.24792 of 2024
DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS WITHDRAWN WITHOUT COSTS
1z2 {t,/tr
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner should be permitted to pay fees and admit to the course as per provisional allotment?
Mudige Shruthi
The Telangana State Council for Higher Education
The Convener, Telangana Engineering, Agriculture & Pharmacy Common Entrance Test, 2024
Sri Indu College of Engineering and Technology
T. VINOD KUMAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
