Dismissed¶40

Mushini Srinivas, v. Maintenance Tribunal and R.D.O.

Telangana HC23 Jul 2025WP/24042/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Writ petition dismissed for non-prosecution/default; no representation by petitioners on 16.04.2025, 02.07.2025 and on hearing date; listed under caption 'for Dismissal'; Article 226 writ of Certiorari against order dt. 25-03-2017 of Maintenance Tribunal & R.D.O., Mancherial in Case No. G/144/2017; Section 151 CPC suspension application I.A. No. 1 of 2017 (W.P.M.P. No. 29744 of 2017); no order as to costs; pending miscellaneous applications closed; Telangana High Court; Justice K. Sarath; 23 July 2025.

What did the court decide?

The Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution/default as the petitioners showed no interest in prosecuting the case, with no order as to costs. ¶29

Mushini Srinivas, Vs Maintenance Tribunal and… — Writ and Judicial Review | Telangana HC (2025)

¶1

t I

¶2

[³³⁰² ]

¶3

IN THE HIGH^{COURTFORTHE STATE OF TELANGANA} AT HYDERABAD (SPecial Original Jurisdiction)

¶4

WEDNESDAY,^{THE TWENTYTHIRD DAY OF JULY} TWO THOUSAND^{AND TWENTY FIVE}

¶5

PRESENT

¶6

THE HONOURABLE^{SRI JUSTICEK. SARATH}

¶7

WRIT PETI^{TIONNO: 2 40420F 2017}

¶8

Between:

¶9

Mushini Srinivas,^{S/o: M.Sudhaka(aged aqout54-years'Fl/o H'No'23-43/1'} ' S;ij;'i!"s;i-Suhnamunatti Area, Pos-t and District Mancherial

¶10

2.M.VenkataRamana,S/o:M.Sudhakar,ag_edabout45years,Rl/oMD-913' - Ei;;"k46; Poit ina cotonv, Godavarikhani' Peddapalli Diskict'

¶11

,..PETITIONERS

¶12

AND

¶13

¶14

Maintenance^{Tribunal & R.D.O., Post and District Nlancherial'}

¶15

Mushini Sudhakar,^{S/o: Sattaiah,aged major,Retd ' Employee of Singareni} 6Jrrlli'ii!.-cii.i,l",iv ii.ii"a,^{R/oH llo 20-341, Ra ma krishnapuram'} Mandamani Mandal,^{Mancherial District'}

¶16

3 RYr?lf,YJ,,HL:iffi##:i1,X313!^5il"#li#3ii3t*''

¶17

..RESPONDENTS

¶18

Petition under^{Article 226 of the Constitutronof lndia praying that in the} circumstances^{stated in the affidavitfiled therewith'the High Court may be} pleased to issue a writ^{or orderor direction'especiallyone in the nature of Writ of} Certiorari-i)callforrecordspertainstoCaSeNo.Gll44t2olTonthefileofthe MaintenanceTribunalandRevenueDivisionalOfficer'tVlancherial'andquashthe same duly^{setting aside the order dl'25-03-2}17passed therein iii) and pass}

¶19

I I t I t I

¶20

l.A. NO: 1 0F 2017(WPM P. NO: 29744 OF 2017

¶21

Petition under section 151 cpc praying that in the circurnstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court rray be pleased to suspend the operation of the order dt.2s-o3-2o17 passed in cas;e No.G/144120.r7, dt.25-o3-2017 by the 1st respondent, pending disposal of the abr>ve writ petition,

¶22

Counsel for the Petitioners: SRI K. VASUDEVA REDDY

¶23

Counsel for the Respondent No.1: Gp FOR REVENUE

¶24

The Court made the following: ORDER

¶25

THE HONOURABLE^{SRI JUSTICEK'SARATH}

¶26

WRIT^{PETITION No.24042 of 20L7}

¶27

ORD^ER:

¶28

This^{petition is coming for hearing since 2017' On} 16.04.2025^{and 02'07'2025when the matter was called'} there^{was no representationon behalf of the petitioners'} therefore,^{the matter was directed to be listed' under the} caption^{"for Dismissal'' Even today' when the matteris} called,^{there is no representation'Itseems that the} petitioners^{are not interested to prosecute this case'}

¶29

Accordingly,^{the Writ Petition isdismissedfor} non-prosecution/default'^{No order as to costs'}

¶30

Pending^{miscellaneousapplications' il any' in this} Writ Petition^{shall also stand closed'}

¶31

SD/.A.V.S.PRASAD D PUTY REGISTRAR

¶32

/ffRUE COPY//

¶33

ECTION OFFICER

¶34

To, 1 2^. .^One Two CCs^{CC to} to^Sri GP^K. for^Vasudeva Revenue,^{Reddy, High Court for the State of Advocate [OPUC]Telangana, at} Hyderabad [OUT] 3. Two CD Copies TJ GJP fr

HIGH COURT

DATED:23101\ZOZS

ORDER

WP.No.24042 of 2017

-1 r t r. -1-i. - .. \s- .
" (,,..',".
,i.'-t).''-
<br>2 o sEP 'nrq
'ir.

¶40

DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION FOR NONPROSECUTION/DEFAULT