T Kausalya Devi Vs The District Registrar

Meher Sunder Smita, D/o. T. Kausalya Devi, Aged about 32 years. Occ Housewife, Both are R:/o. H. No.2_9l hSiqol, n etSck O,"L, f"-rr"il, Wiit" Filed, Kondapur, Hyderabad _ 500 032.

¶11

Mahaveer Jain, S/o. Mahender Kumar Jain, Aged about 36 years. occ Business, R/o. ptot No.39. Laxmi ltiq;r^{-C;ony, -A-b'"d'"'cXil,} Picket,Secunderabad - 500 026

¶12

...PETtTtONER(S)

¶13

AND

¶14

The Diskict Registrar, Hyderabad District, Hyderabad

¶15

The Sub Registrar, Cantonment, Bowenpally, Secunderabad

¶16

J- The Joint Sub Registrar, Bowenpally, Secunderabad

¶17

The District Collector, Hyderabad District, Hyderabad.

¶18

The State of Telangana, Eqp, Oy its principal Secretary, Revenue uepartment, Secretariat Building, Hyderabad.

¶19

b The Tahsildar, MaredpallyMandal, Secunderabad.

¶20

...RESPONDENTS

¶21

Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High colrt ina"y be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction, one more particurarly in the nature of a wrii ot Mandamus declaring the action of Respondenis in not receiving and registerint the sale deed in respect of^prot No.42 in sy. No.74l6, admeasuririg aea.aE sq. %ros situated at Balamrai co-op Housing society Limited, Maiindra Hiils, East Marredpally, Secunderabad, Telangani State, is being arbitrarcnO iif.grf ;O consequently direct the Respondents to register and rJlease the same aier due registration

¶22

lA NO: 1 OF 2020

¶23

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondents lo receive and register the sale deed in respect of the petitioner property in Plot No.42 in Sy. No.74l6, admeasuring 48B.BB Sq. Yards situated at Balamrai Co-op Housing Society Limited, Mahindra Hitls, East Marredpally, Secunderabad, Telangana State, pending the disposal of the writ petition

¶24

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRl. P SRI HARSHA REDDY

¶25

Counsel for the Respondents: Ms.S. SRAVATHI AGP FOR STAMPS AND REGISTRATION

¶26

The Court made the following: ORDER

¶27

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.SARATH

¶28

WRIT PETITION No.23 229 of 2O2O

¶29

ORDER:

¶30

Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and Ms.S.Sravathi, learned Assistant Government pleader for Stamps and Registration appearing for the respondents and perused the material on record.

¶31

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that at the time of admission, this Court granted interim order on 23.12.2020 directing the Registering Authorities to receive and register the document presented by the petitioners, if it is otherwise lound to be in compliance with the requirements of the Registration Act, 1908 and the Indian Stamp Act, 1899.

¶32

Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that in pursuance to the interim ordei: passed by this Court on 23.I2.2O2O, the Registering Authorities have registered the subject document.

¶33

ii

¶34

sr(, J W.P.No.23229 OF 2O2O

¶35

Learned Counsei for both sides submits that the connected matter in W.P.No.19106 of 2O1,O filed bv the State Government against the order in LGC.No. 167 ol 1997 passed by the Special Court under the A.P. Land Grabbing (Prohibition) Act, 1982, Hyderabad, was dismissed by the Division Bench of this Court on 28.O5.2025

¶36

In view of the submissions made by both sides and in view of the dismissal of W.P.No.19106 of 2OlO on 28.05.2025, the interim order passed by this Court in LA.No.1 of 2O2O in W.P.No.23229 of 2O2O. dated 23.72.2020 is made absolute. Accordinglv, the writ petition is disposed of.

¶37

It is made clear that mere registration of the document does not confer title on the subject property and it is also made clear that this order would not have any bearing on a,ll those matters where title/rights of the parties are pending before the authorities either in rEvision/appeals for adjudication and in any other case tAis orde. also does not preclude the parties in asserting

¶38

I

¶39

SI(, J W.P.No.23229 OF 2O2O

¶40

their rights before a competent Court of law. There shall

¶41

be no order as to costs.

¶42