Writ petition sought mandamus directing police to act on FIR No.97 of 2019 of Yadagirigutta Police Station. Counsel for petitioner stated the cause did not survive and sought withdrawal; the High Court dismissed the writ petition as withdrawn with no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[32ee l
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY,THE ELEVENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE E.V. VENUGOPAL
WRIT PETITION NO: 220'l OF 2020
Between:
Siddagouni Naresh, S/o. Sailu, aged about 31 Years, Occ. Business,Rl/o. !-1.No. l-'l49, Lashkarguda, Anajpur, Ranga Reddy District.
...PETITIONER
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndiapraying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Courtmay be pleased to issue a writ in the nature of lvlandamus or any other appropriate writ,
order or direction, by declaring the action of therespondent; 2 and 3 in not taking action in pursuance of FIR No.97 of 2019, dt.03/05/201 ) on the file of the Yadagirigutta Police Siation, Nalgonda District, asillegal, rrbitrary, violative of Criminal Procedure Principles of naturaljustice and contrary to theprovisionsl Code and consequently directthe respondents2 & 3 to t;l e immediate further action in accordance withlaw in pursuanceof FIR No.97o1 r019, dr.03/05/2019 on the file of the YadagiriguttaPolice Station, Nalgonda Distr :t
lA NO: 1 OF 2020
Petition under Section151 CPC praying that in the ci'( umstances statedin the affidavit filed in supportof the petition, the High Cou.l maybe pleasedto direct responCents 2 & 3 lo takeimmediate furtheraction ir tccordance with law in pursuance of FIR No.97 ol2019, dt. 03/05/2019on the frl€ of the Yadagirigutta Police Station, Nalgonda District,pending finaldisposal of tl-t main W.P.
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRIS AJAYKUMAR
Counsel for the RespondentNos. 'l to 3: GP FORHOME
Counsel for the RespondentNos.4to 9: ---
The Court made the following:ORDER
I
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE E.V.VENUGOPAL
II/RIT PETITION No.22OL OF 2O2O
ORDER:
This Writ Petitior-r is liled seeking a Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of therespondents2 and 3 in not taking action in pursuance of FIRNo.97 l2019, dated03.05.2019 on the hle of Yadagirigutta Police Station,Nalgonda District, as illegal and arbitrary; and consequently, to directthe respondents 2 and 3 to tal(c action inaccordancewith lawin pursuance to FIR No.97 l2O19, clated03.O5.2019 on thefile of Yadagirigutta Police Station,NalgondaDistrict.
I'agc 2 o[3
There shall benoorder as to costs A; asequel, miscellaneouspetitions, ifarry, pendillg' : hallstand
dismissed
SD/. M. NAGAMANI AS{; $TANT REGISTRAR
I
---\
//TRUE COPY//
dECTION OFFICER
To,
TJNr
HlGH COURT
DATED:1 110912025
ORDER
WP.No.2201 ot 2020
--4':-'.::-
i€
i .irttr. sra-:.l:
/.-'
c
(J i3Jflil&s Z
,+
'1=:r:'-:'.2
DISMISS!NG THE WRIT PETITION
AS WITHDRAWN WITHOUT COSTS
6
,."V
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Siddagouni Naresh
The State of Telangana, rep. by its Principal Secretary, Home Dept.
The Inspector of Police / SHO, Yadagirigutta Police Station
The Sub-Inspector of Police, Yadagirigutta Police Station
Gattapally Yadagiri
Ghanapuram Satyanarayana
E.V. Venugopal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
