Dismissed

Sri. Sanem Krishna Goud v. State of Telangana

Telangana HC23 Jul 2025WP/21222/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Writ petition seeking a direction to police to register a crime on the petitioner's complaint was not pressed; counsel sought permission to withdraw and pursue alternative remedies. The writ petition was dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty granted and no order as to costs.

What did the court decide?

Liberty granted to withdraw and pursue alternative remedies; writ petition dismissed without costs.

Sri. Sanem Krishna Goud Vs State of Telangana — Quashing and FIR | Telangana HC (2025)

¶1

[^31GG J

¶2

tN THE HrcH couRT FoR THtr -era.rc a- -_. _ [^31GG (' r"# i:'}fl:i.P,i, JSlf l'"3^ NA Ar H yD E RA BAD

¶3

WEDNESDAY,. J u L Y *" i,i JUSffiTH Ifl FflrwvoJ

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

Between:

¶6

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.VINOD KUMAR ITPETIT roN NO: 21 OF 2025

¶7

E!:fl"$,i,#ll'ff^{",P",11;"?%Blp;I""J,i,ix,..#,i,3?sfl}

#,Jiil:"?:i,R?,r#

AND

...PETITIONER

1 3:1i:li,I?il;tr: oT3:', its^principa r Secreta ry- Ho me Depa rtment,

¶12

z 3:,Xltil:[r"J;?'r:ilifi,i[1*,.nda^porice commissionerate Vayupuri,

¶13

3 Iffitl",J"lr:l^{se off icer,A bdufl a pu rm et po tice} Statio n, Racha konda po tice

¶14

..,RESPONDENTS

¶15

Petition under Articre 226 0f the constitution of rndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fired ther,ewith, the High court may be pleased to pass an order or orders or direction more particurarry in the nature of writ of Mandamus, decraring the action of the Respondent no. 3 in fairing to register a crime' and initate steps in pursuance of the petitioner s complaint dated. 261O6t2O25, as i,egat, arbitrary, contrary to the procedure and provisions enshrined in the B ZOZ+ and contrary to the guidelines framed by the Supreme court in Larita Kumari versus state of uttar pradesh and others, 2014 (2) SCC 1, besides being voirative of the petitioner s rights guaranteed under the Article 14 of the constitution of rndia and to consequenfly direct tne Respondent no 3 to take action against the petitioner compraint dated.26ro6r2025, and pass such other order or orders may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case

¶16

lA NO:^{1 OF 2025}

¶17

Petition^{underSt'ction151 CPCprayingthatin the circumstances statedin} the affidavit^{filed in sup port of the petition,the Highcourt may be pleased direct} the^{RespondentNo.3herein to register a crimepursuantto the Petitioners} complaint^{daled 26to312025by adhering to the guidelinesf ramed by the} Honourable^{Supreme t'o'n'n t-atitaX'ma'i Vs State of Uttar Pradeshand others} in 2014^{(2) SCC1 pen ling disposat of the abovewrit petition and pass such other} order or^{orders may deem fit and proper in the circumstancesof the case'} pending disposal^{of thr: above writ petition'}

¶18

Counsel^{for the Petiti rner : SRI SRINIVAS PODICHETI}

¶19

Counsel^{forthe Respondents:GP FOR HOME}

¶20

The Court^{made the lollowing:ORDER}

¶21

THE I{OIV'BI,E SRI JUSTICE T. WIVOD KUT{AR TIoIv lllo.2 7222 o RD E R: of 2025

¶22

. After maJ<ing ini submissions' Iearned counser for the petitioner seeks otial ion of the Court to withdraw the Writ perition .i th I to pursue alternative remedies available to the petidor:"

¶23

Granting libertl dismissed as sought for, this Writ petition is ""^{*itt a..,} trn. No order as tc costs.

¶24

Consequently, miscellaneous petitions pending, if

¶25

any, shall stand closed.

¶26

SO/. AHMED ABDUL LAH KHAN //TRUE COPYII ASSISTANT R GI TRAR

¶27

To,

¶28

SEC OFFICER

¶29

One CC to SRt SR|N|VAS PODICHET|, Advocate. tOpUCJ I 2. Two CCs to Gp FOI I H.ME' High court for the State of re 3. Two cD copies. langana. [OUTJ BSK I. LS \Y.

¶30

HIGH^COURT

¶31

DATED:23t0712025

¶32

,4'n .,, //_rt: ii -.-.'::-.-\l'.1 r ,. -:)..,
.r' .L'
20 StP 20ffi
,')

¶33

ORDER

¶34

WP.No.212211.^{of 2025}

¶35

DISMISSINCi THE WRIT PETITION AS WITHDRAWN WITHOUT COSTS

¶36

2tlSb,r-

Sri. Sanem Krishna Goud v. State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sri. Sanem Krishna Goud v. State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Murali Krishna Kona Vs The State of Telangana

Krishna Nagar Plots Owners Welfare Society Vs The State of Telangana and 8 Others

Thota Ragini Vs The State of Telangana

Mr. Ghanshyam Das Karwa Vs The State of Telangana

Ramreddy Chicken Market Vs The State of Telangana and 3 others

Pasham Narsimlu Vs The State of Telangana