Writ petition challenging a GST DRC-07 order passed under the CGST/TGST Act was withdrawn by the petitioner and the High Court dismissed it as withdrawn with no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[3488 I
i i i I i
IN THE HIGHCOURTFOR THE STATEOF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
(SPecial Original Jurisdiction)
MONDAY,THE FOURTHDAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSANDANDTWENTYFIVE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLETHE CHIEF JUSTICEAPARESH KUMARSINGH AND THE HONOURABLESRIJUSTICE GOUSE MEERAMOHIUDDTN
WRIT PETITIONNO:2 12150F 2025
Between:
Terminus Kg VenturesPrivate Limited, Suit No 902, Level-9' SurveyNo 133' sIru'iJrr*ii-.t"ri,-CicrriOowti,-Hyderabad,Telangana-- 500 032 Represented ov itt-CfO Shri.Solipuram'Prabhaker Reddy,S/o. S LaxmiNarasimha R,ed;,;;"J6z v.i"E,ivo' Vilh No. 50, Ektha Prime Hishland Park' Contiibntir-noipdtaoao, puppiiguoa,Rajendra Nagar'K V Rangareddv District, Telangana- 500 089
...PETITIONER
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article226 of the constitution of lndia prayingthat in the circumstances statedin the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court maybe pleased to issue a writ, order,or directionor plea one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaringthat impugnedOrder in Form GSTDRC-07vide Ref No' 2D36O225O71897Ydated 24-02-2025 passedby the',l't Respondent underthe provisionsofCGsT/TGSTAct,20,tTaSbeingvoid'arbitrary,illegal,without jurisdiction, violative of theprinciplesof naturaljustice apart from beingviolative ofArticlesla'19(1Xg)and265oftheConstitutionoflndia,andtoConsequently set aside the same
I
TIIE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI K SINGH A]\ID
THE TION' BI,E SRI JUSTICE GOUSE MEERA MOIIII]DDIN
WRIT PETITION No.212l 5 of.2O25
ORDER:
Mr. Venkat Prasad, learned counsel for the petitioner. Mr. Swaroop Oorilla, learned Special Govemment Pleader for State Tax appearing for the respondents.
\
"For all the reasons stated in the accompanying afiidavit, it is prayed that this Hon,ble High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order, or direction or plea one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring that impugned Order in Form GST DRC_07 vide Ref No. 2D36O225O7 t89ry dated 24-02-2025 passed by the lsr Respondent under the provisions of CGST/TGST Act, 2Ol7 as being void, arbitrary, illegal, v/ithout jurisdiction, violative of the principles of natural justice apart from being violative of Articles 14, lg(f)G) and 265 o[ the Constitution of India, and to consequen y set aside the same and pass such further or other orderfs) as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumslances of the case.'
2
permission to withdrawthis writ petition'
Miscellaneous applicationspending, ifany' shall
stand closed.
SD/. M.OSMANALt BAIG A NT REGISTRAR
//TRUECOPY//
TION OFFICER
To,
l One CC toSRI P. VENKAT PRASAD' Advo9gte [OPUCI , rwo ccs to SPECIAL GdiiEiNiltiftplenoen'High-court for the state - oii"irngrna, at Hyderabad [OUTI
BM
I TKS
\I
1 I I l I i 1 I i i iI I , I I I II t I I ! '
HIGH COURT
DATED:0410812025
l:.
.: .:.:..
ie: IP 20fr
( i
\i...,'r; r^
ORDER
WP.No.21215 of 2025
DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS WITHDRAWN WITHOUT COSTS
u
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Terminus Kg Ventures Private Limited
The Deputy Commissioner of State Tax, STU-2, Punjagutta Division
The Joint Commissioner of State Tax
State of Telangana, through Principal Secretary to Government, Revenue Department (Commercial Tax)
Aparesh Kumar Singh
Gouse Meera Mohiuddin
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
